[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 4:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: gratuitous ARP with em interface.
>
>
> Thanks all
Thanks all for you replies.
> I haven't tried this, but I think the problem would go away if you
> changed WAIT_FOR_AUTO_NEG_DEFAULT to 0 in "if_em.h".
Changed this. Did not work.
> If u can do kernel debugging put break point at the
> "arp_ifinit" and verify if this was getting called or
> n
PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: gratuitous ARP with em interface.
>
>
> em_ioctl() has a call to ether_ioctl() which in turn calls
> arp_ifinit().
>
> Sreekanth
>
> > -Original Message-
&
#x27;;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: gratuitous ARP with em interface.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> hi,
> I had checked the kernel code of the freeBsd. In case of fxp
> port " fxp_ether_ioctl" fucntional will be
lenius'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'Ruslan Ermilov'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: gratuitous ARP with em interface.
Could be attributed to the spanning tree in the switch.I h
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Petri Helenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't looked that deep into why, but em is quite slow on coming
> up compared to fxp for example. Probably something to do with
> hardware re-initialization.
I haven't tried this, but I think the problem would go away
Helenius
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 4:39 AM
> To: Ruslan Ermilov
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: gratuitous ARP with em interface.
>
>
>
> I haven't looked that deep into why, but em is quite slow on
>
I haven't looked that deep into why, but em is quite slow on coming up
compared to
fxp for example. Probably something to do with hardware re-initialization.
Pete
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 07:57:07PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a known issue with al
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 07:57:07PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a known issue with alias IPs on em interfaces not sending out
> gratuitous arps ?
>
> The situation is as follows:
> I am running a custom redundancy daemon that migrates the IP address of a
> server from
