Hi,
[added -current@ to the CC list, as the issue is still present in 9.0-BETA2]
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> We have been trying to track down a bad mbuf management for about two
>> week
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:40 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> You should probably commit that.
I've been meaning to post it to -current to see if somebody could come
up with a better approach to solving the problem, but if you're happy
with it, I'll submit it to re@.
> I wonder if it should be a KASSER
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:40 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> You should probably commit that.
I've been meaning to post it to -current to see if somebody could come
up with a better approach to solving the problem, but if you're happy
with it, I'll submit it to re@.
> I wonder if it should be a KASSER
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 9:15:38 am Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 14 September 2011 19:40, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > You should probably commit that. I wonder if it should be a KASSERT() also
> > so
> > that it outright panics on a kernel with INVARIANTS enabled so developers
> > will
> > g
On 14 September 2011 19:40, John Baldwin wrote:
> You should probably commit that. I wonder if it should be a KASSERT() also so
> that it outright panics on a kernel with INVARIANTS enabled so developers will
> go fix their code as it seems to me to likely be a bug to enqueue a task that
> many
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 6:29:05 pm Ryan Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> > It did not crash, yet. The only downside is that after 3h30 and ~4h,
> > igb(4) queues' handler started spinning infinitely, breaking network
> > connectivity.
>
> I saw a simi
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> It did not crash, yet. The only downside is that after 3h30 and ~4h,
> igb(4) queues' handler started spinning infinitely, breaking network
> connectivity.
I saw a similar issue on HEAD last week. The attached patch fix the
problem for me.
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>> I have seen this, but I don't have any hot ideas right off the top of my
>> head yet :(
>>
> I've been running for 19h now the following patches:
> - backport of kmacy@'s bu
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> [...]
> In addition to some txeof() handling patches ... Jack can see if this is
> still relevant in the freebsd7 universe. Note that Yahoo is "special"
> and we pluck and chuck code/drivers/whatever at will so I don't know how
> this code w
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 16:19 -0700, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > We have been trying to track down a bad mbuf management for about two
>> > weeks on a custo
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 16:19 -0700, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > We have been trying to track down a bad mbuf management for about two
> > weeks on a customized 7.1 base. I have finally been able to reproduce
> > it wit
I have seen this, but I don't have any hot ideas right off the top of my
head yet :(
Jack
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > We have been trying to track down a bad mbuf management for abo
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> We have been trying to track down a bad mbuf management for about two
> weeks on a customized 7.1 base. I have finally been able to reproduce
> it with a stock FreeBSD 7-STABLE (kernel from r225276, userland from
> 7.4).
>
Hi folks,
We have been trying to track down a bad mbuf management for about two
weeks on a customized 7.1 base. I have finally been able to reproduce
it with a stock FreeBSD 7-STABLE (kernel from r225276, userland from
7.4).
With the help of the attached patches, I have just been able to
trigger
14 matches
Mail list logo
