On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:40 AM, John Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote: > You should probably commit that.
I've been meaning to post it to -current to see if somebody could come up with a better approach to solving the problem, but if you're happy with it, I'll submit it to re@. > I wonder if it should be a KASSERT() also so > that it outright panics on a kernel with INVARIANTS enabled so developers will > go fix their code as it seems to me to likely be a bug to enqueue a task that > many times. I can quite trivially reproduce this right now, so that would be something to consider after 9.0 branches off of HEAD. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
