On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:40 AM, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> You should probably commit that.

I've been meaning to post it to -current to see if somebody could come
up with a better approach to solving the problem, but if you're happy
with it, I'll submit it to re@.

> I wonder if it should be a KASSERT() also so
> that it outright panics on a kernel with INVARIANTS enabled so developers will
> go fix their code as it seems to me to likely be a bug to enqueue a task that
> many times.

I can quite trivially reproduce this right now, so that would be
something to consider after 9.0 branches off of HEAD.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to