On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 02:16:20PM +0200, Christian Brueffer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 01:59:47PM +0200, mer mite wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'm looking for a way to provide ethernet interface bonding in FreeBSD
> > similar to ipmp in Solaris or just ethern
On Monday 03 September 2007 15:16:20 Christian Brueffer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 01:59:47PM +0200, mer mite wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'm looking for a way to provide ethernet interface bonding in FreeBSD
> > similar to ipmp in Solaris or just ethernet bond
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 01:59:47PM +0200, mer mite wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm looking for a way to provide ethernet interface bonding in FreeBSD
> similar to ipmp in Solaris or just ethernet bonding in Linux. Don't want to
> do anything fancy. Just want a second inter
Hi All,
I'm looking for a way to provide ethernet interface bonding in FreeBSD
similar to ipmp in Solaris or just ethernet bonding in Linux. Don't want to
do anything fancy. Just want a second interface to take over for one which
has failed. Preferable would be a solution that doesn
rs in a active-standby failover
AK> mode, with a single IP flipping between the two.
AK> Under Solaris I can do this with nafo or more recently
AK> ipmp. Under Linux I can use the Ethernet bonding
AK> driver in mode=1 to get this behavior. I did not find
AK> any ready made solutions fo
this with nafo or more recently
ipmp. Under Linux I can use the Ethernet bonding
driver in mode=1 to get this behavior. I did not find
any ready made solutions for FreeBSD so i coded my own
perl script to look at ifconfig and do a failover
based on "status" ... it can also ping a couple o
Hello,
> Could someone please explain to me how to setup a channel-bond between
> two ethernet cards?
http://people.freebsd.org/~paul/FEC/
>From there, you can fetch the needed source. You have to copy it into your
source tree, compile and install.
After you have the ng_fec module in /modules, se
At 02:48 19-2-2002 -0600, Nick Rogness wrote:
>On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Zviratko wrote:
>
> >
>[SNIP]
> >
> > I will try that, but I guess default route has precedence over ipfw.
>
> Not in the case of ipfw fwd. The routing decision seems to be
> made before ipfw fwd changes the packe
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 01:44:05PM -0800, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > The only real "cisco only" protocol is the PAgP (Port Aggregation
> > Protocol) which is essentially just a FEC auto-negiotation protocol they
> > made up. AFAIK noone other then Cisco actually implements this though.
>
> Don'
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Zviratko wrote:
>
[SNIP]
>
> I will try that, but I guess default route has precedence over ipfw.
Not in the case of ipfw fwd. The routing decision seems to be
made before ipfw fwd changes the packet.
Nick Rogness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Don't mind me...I
>> The only real "cisco only" protocol is the PAgP (Port Aggregation
>> Protocol) which is essentially just a FEC auto-negiotation protocol they
>> made up. AFAIK noone other then Cisco actually implements this though.
> Don't forget to add EIGRP and CDP to the list. -sc
actually, the one with
> The only real "cisco only" protocol is the PAgP (Port Aggregation
> Protocol) which is essentially just a FEC auto-negiotation protocol they
> made up. AFAIK noone other then Cisco actually implements this though.
Don't forget to add EIGRP and CDP to the list. -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
To Un
> > ng_fec needs a cisco at the other end (or possibly another freebsd
> > machine with ng_fec but I don't know that).
Fast EtherChannel doesn't actually require a Cisco device on the other
side, it is really just a "non-standardized standard" for the hashing
that decides which physical interfa
I just got it to work by using ng_one2many:
ifconfig ed1 up lladdr 00:88:e8:83:63:c0
ifconfig ed2 up lladdr 00:88:e8:83:63:c0
kldload /modules/ng_ether.ko
ngctl mkpeer ed1: one2many upper one
ngctl connect ed1: ed1:upper lower many0
ngctl connect ed2: ed1:upper lower many1
ngctl msg ed2: setpromi
>
> > Hi,
> > is there a preferred way to do ethernet load balancing? My situation
is - 2
> > cable modems connected to two ethernet cards on with a machine
functioning
> > as a NAT gateway for LAN. I tried netgraph (ng_ether with round robin
and
> > ng_fec). With ng_ether, I achieved packets bei
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Zviratko wrote:
> Hi,
> is there a preferred way to do ethernet load balancing? My situation is - 2
> cable modems connected to two ethernet cards on with a machine functioning
> as a NAT gateway for LAN. I tried netgraph (ng_ether with round robin and
> ng_fec). With ng_et
Hi,
is there a preferred way to do ethernet load balancing? My situation is - 2
cable modems connected to two ethernet cards on with a machine functioning
as a NAT gateway for LAN. I tried netgraph (ng_ether with round robin and
ng_fec). With ng_ether, I achieved packets being sent via one interfa
17 matches
Mail list logo
