On Saturday 31 May 2003 02:43 am, Erwane Breton wrote:
> > Repeat after me: "Collisions are normal on ethernet. 0.03% is
> > nothing to be upset about."
>
> "Collisions are normal on ethrnet. 0.03% is nothing to be upset
> about."
Very good. ;^) Another freebsd-net success story.
--
>Changing both sides to full-duplex removes to collisions.
>However: Changing only one side _always_ results in packet-loss!
It´s only when both sides transmit at once. Which is not always.
It happens almost always though.
Pete
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] m
> Repeat after me: "Collisions are normal on ethernet. 0.03% is
> nothing to be upset about."
>
> --
> "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
>
> Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Collisions are normal on ethrnet. 0.03% is nothi
On Friday 30 May 2003 09:26, Erwane Breton wrote:
> > > Well, I don't see the problem.
> > >
> > > My math says that that's .03% collision rate, which is so deep in
> > > the noise as to be practically zero. What do you _think_ it
> > > should be?
> >
> > Even Mr. Inventor of the ethernet himself
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 06:26:56PM +0200 I heard the voice of
Erwane Breton, and lo! it spake thus:
> > >
> > > Well, I don't see the problem.
> > >
> > > My math says that that's .03% collision rate, which is so deep in the
> > > noise as to be practically zero. What do you _think_ it should be
> > >
> > > Well, I don't see the problem.
> > >
> > > My math says that that's .03% collision rate, which is so
> deep in the
> > > noise as to be practically zero. What do you _think_ it
> should be?
> > >
> > Even Mr. Inventor of the ethernet himself regrets calling
> them collisions beca
Of Erwane Breton
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 9:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Collision on NIC
>
>
> > >
> > > Well, I don't see the problem.
> > >
> > > My math says that that's .03% collision rate, which is so deep in
> >
> > Well, I don't see the problem.
> >
> > My math says that that's .03% collision rate, which is so deep in the
> > noise as to be practically zero. What do you _think_ it should be?
> >
> Even Mr. Inventor of the ethernet himself regrets calling them collisions because
> that term has a b
>
> Well, I don't see the problem.
>
> My math says that that's .03% collision rate, which is so deep in the
> noise as to be practically zero. What do you _think_ it should be?
>
Even Mr. Inventor of the ethernet himself regrets calling them collisions because
that term has a bad ring people u
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 03:51:43PM +0200 I heard the voice of
Erwane Breton, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> On my FreeBSD box
> Network interface status:
> Ipkts Ierrs IbytesOpkts Oerrs Obytes Coll
> 21852457 0 280187344 28530965 7 3906410421 8584
> Lot of collisio
Hi,
Few weeks ago, i discovered i have collision on my NIC for my Adsl ethernet modem
(ed0). After research i found the other FreeBSD box i used, have same problem.
Take a look.
On my FreeBSD box
Network interface status:
NameMtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Ibytes
11 matches
Mail list logo
