On Friday 30 May 2003 09:26, Erwane Breton wrote:
> > > Well, I don't see the problem.
> > >
> > > My math says that that's .03% collision rate, which is so deep in
> > > the noise as to be practically zero. What do you _think_ it
> > > should be?
> >
> > Even Mr. Inventor of the ethernet himself regrets calling them
> > collisions because that term has a bad ring people unfamiliar with
> > the technological detail.
> >
> > Pete
>
> So there are no answers or solutions ?
If it were a problem there might be a solution, but collisions
are not a problem, they're normal on an ethernet. When you
read "collision" you think "error." You must retrain your mind,
collisions are normal operating procedure on ethernet. Really.
If the collisions were above 10%, it would be cause for concern;
at 0.03% I can only conclude that you have a switched ethernet
and have occasional broadcast traffic. 0.03% is way too low for
any half-duplex (i.e. built with hubs) network.
Repeat after me: "Collisions are normal on ethernet. 0.03% is
nothing to be upset about."
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
