On Fri Oct 23 09:05:53 2015, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Is 2a00:5884::1/64 configured on em1? An address within
> 2a00:5884:8200::/40 is required on em1 in this case.
em1 is configured with 2a00:5884::1/36 (which does not contain
2a00:5884:8200::/40), but physically this two networks are at the same
Alarig Le lay wrote
in <20151022230838.ga22...@drscott.swordarmor.fr>:
al> Do you have any idea about this issue? Did I make a mistake or is it a
al> bug?
Is 2a00:5884::1/64 configured on em1? An address within
2a00:5884:8200::/40 is required on em1 in this case.
-- Hiroki
pgplf0mxAUESy.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Alarig Le lay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I try to add an IPv6 route on a 10.1 FreeBSD router by using the option
> -interface. It works with IPv4 but not with IPv6.
>
> In IPv4:
> alarig@nominoe:~ % ping 192.168.1.1
> PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
> 76 bytes
Hi,
I try to add an IPv6 route on a 10.1 FreeBSD router by using the option
-interface. It works with IPv4 but not with IPv6.
In IPv4:
alarig@nominoe:~ % ping 192.168.1.1
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
76 bytes from te0-0-2-2.rcr11.uro01.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.1.242):
Destinat