On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Alarig Le lay <ala...@swordarmor.fr> wrote:
> Hi, > > I try to add an IPv6 route on a 10.1 FreeBSD router by using the option > -interface. It works with IPv4 but not with IPv6. > > In IPv4: > alarig@nominoe:~ % ping 192.168.1.1 > PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes > 76 bytes from te0-0-2-2.rcr11.uro01.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.1.242): > Destination Net Unreachable > Vr HL TOS Len ID Flg off TTL Pro cks Src Dst > 4 5 68 0054 0bea 0 0000 3e 01 d145 149.6.72.98 192.168.1.1 > alarig@nominoe:~ % sudo route add 192.168.1.0/24 -interface em1 > add net 192.168.1.0: gateway em1 > alarig@nominoe:~ % ping 192.168.1.1 > PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=75 ttl=64 time=0.831 ms > > In IPv6: > alarig@nominoe:~ % ping6 2a00:5884:8200::100 > PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:978:2:4e::5:2 --> 2a00:5884:8200::100 > ^C > --- 2a00:5884:8200::100 ping6 statistics --- > 3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss > > alarig@nominoe:~ % sudo route add -6 2a00:5884:8200::/40 -interface em1 > add net 2a00:5884:8200::/40: gateway em1 > alarig@nominoe:~ % ping6 2a00:5884:8200::100 > PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2a00:5884::1 --> 2a00:5884:8200::100 > ping6: sendmsg: Operation not permitted > ping6: wrote 2a00:5884:8200::100 16 chars, ret=-1 > > This operation works on linux: > alarig@judicael:~$ ping6 2a00:5884:8200::100 > PING 2a00:5884:8200::100(2a00:5884:8200::100) 56 data bytes > From 2a00:5884::1 icmp_seq=1 Destination unreachable: Address > unreachable > From 2a00:5884::1 icmp_seq=2 Destination unreachable: Address > unreachable > ^C > --- 2a00:5884:8200::100 ping statistics --- > 2 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100% packet loss, time > 1007ms > alarig@judicael:~$ sudo ip -6 route add 2a00:5884:8200::/40 dev eth0 > alarig@judicael:~$ ping6 2a00:5884:8200::100 > PING 2a00:5884:8200::100(2a00:5884:8200::100) 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 2a00:5884:8200::100: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=1.41 ms > 64 bytes from 2a00:5884:8200::100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=0.588 ms > 64 bytes from 2a00:5884:8200::100: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=0.459 ms > ^C > --- 2a00:5884:8200::100 ping statistics --- > 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2000ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.459/0.819/1.410/0.421 ms > > It also works if I add an intermediate router: > alarig@nominoe:~ % sudo route add -6 2a00:5884:8200::/40 2a00:5884::3 > add net 2a00:5884:8200::/40: gateway 2a00:5884::3 > alarig@nominoe:~ % ping6 2a00:5884:8200::100 > PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2a00:5884::1 --> 2a00:5884:8200::100 > 16 bytes from 2a00:5884:8200::100, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=0.590 ms > 16 bytes from 2a00:5884:8200::100, icmp_seq=1 hlim=64 time=0.699 ms > 16 bytes from 2a00:5884:8200::100, icmp_seq=2 hlim=64 time=0.764 ms > 16 bytes from 2a00:5884:8200::100, icmp_seq=3 hlim=64 time=0.806 ms > ^C > --- 2a00:5884:8200::100 ping6 statistics --- > 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 0.590/0.715/0.806/0.081 ms > > > This router is theoretically useless as it is on the same network than the > FreeBSD one. > > Do you have any idea about this issue? Did I make a mistake or is it a > bug? > > Thanks, > -- > Alarig Le Lay > Take a look at route(8). There are significant syntax differences. E.g. On FreeBSD route(8) has no "-6" option. It uses "-inet6". That may not be the only issue, but I need to get out the door to get to a hockey match. the rest is at least close. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
