> I've got a 12.2/amd64 desktop pc with the following on the motherboard:
> > re0: port
> > 0xe000-0xe0ff mem 0xf7404000-0xf7404fff,0xf740-0xf7403fff irq 33 at
> > device 0.0 on pci4
X-CMAE-Envelope:
MS4xfI3JetPKe+rXxs5wSzrdeBuaH0KZ79U/puwYX+seY/Buje1azNZvOEG3Z0BVGiFjZltB7DNnh/U0zPILHHa2NXU
from Kevin Bowling:
> I have been looking into client networking issues in FreeBSD lately.
> To summarize the situation, common NICs like Intel gigabit (e1000 aka
> lem(4)/em(4)/igb(4)), Realtek (re(4)), Aquantia, and Tehuti Networks
> are unmaintained or not present on FreeBSD. The purpose of
Is is possible to have two or more /etc/exports files, using different names of
course?
One possible scenario is having one exports file for NFS 4 and one for NFS3,
for clients that don't support NFS 4?
NetBSD, for instance, does not support NFS 4, though they are slowly working on
it.
Tom
How do you umount a file system that has been mounted with mount_nfs when the
connection is lost?
Server can crash, cable modem could quit and not hold power, or a change in
cable modem or router could change 192.168.0.1 to 192.168.1.1 .
Running umount hangs the terminal session. Is there a wa
from Dave Cottlehuber:
> > On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, at 04:33, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > Is it possible to build and install FreeBSD so as to be bootable and access
> > the internet with an Ethernet card that doesn't work in FreeBSD?
> > Could Ethernet sup
from Nick Wolff:
> Yes this is no issue just need to make sure you don't have an default route
> on your Ethernet interface(May need to set a static) and that the hotspot
> network and intranet network doesn't overlap.
To use the ethernet, I believe I need
route add default 192.168.0.1
if I don
from Mel Pilgrim and my last post:
> On 2019-06-22 18:24, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > I would like to know if it is possible to have both Ethernet and
> > wi-fi running concurrently?
>
> > Purpose would be, if the cable service is down, meaning no internet
> > access b
I would like to know if it is possible to have both Ethernet and wi-fi running
concurrently?
Purpose would be, if the cable service is down, meaning no internet access but
intranet OK, to continue to have intranet access while using wi-fi with a
mobile phone as hotspot to aceess the internet.
from Ronald F. Guilmette:
> "Thomas Mueller" wrote:
> >Is it possible to build and install FreeBSD so as to be bootable and access
> >the internet with an Ethernet card that doesn't work in FreeBSD?
> You're question doesn't make a lot
Is it possible to build and install FreeBSD so as to be bootable and access the
internet with an Ethernet card that doesn't work in FreeBSD?
Could Ethernet support be obtained through UEFI?
Or could FreeBSD be installed on another computer or on a NAS NFS share? NAS
would probably not have TFT
).
We also have related technology users like: Google Sheets, Nagios,
PeopleSoft, Fonts.com, Wufoo, Marketo and many more.
Please let me know and share your thoughts, if you are interested so that I
will get back to you with the counts, sample and pricing in detail.
Regards,
Helen Thomas
the right person in
your organization.
Best Regards,
David Thomas
To opt out,please response Exit.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
en queue overflow"
messages can be almost impossible to find if the process/socket is
short-lived.
Thank you in advance for any input!
Best regards,
Thomas Steen Rasmussen
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On 12/12/2017 08:56 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On 12.12.2017 09:31, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
>
>> After upgrading to r326782 I get the following error when trying to
>> delete the lo0 entry (I have an rc.d script to do it):
>>
>> $ sudo route delete 185.
ng to routing socket: Address already in use
delete host 185.96.180.10 fib 0: gateway uses the same route
$
What gives? What do I do now? :)
Thanks!
Best regards
Thomas Steen Rasmussen
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.
On 12.07.2017 15:22, Kajetan Staszkiewicz wrote:
> And again, with the latest patch number:
> 11.0-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p1 #0 r306420
Eugene Grosbein:
> Please try 11.1 Release Candidate 2 where this problem should be fixed:
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/11.
--- Comment #1 from Mark Linimon ---
Is this problem also in FreeBSD 10?
This problem was in FreeBSD 10 but was fixed somewhere around the time of 10.2.
As for possible relapse, I can't say, because I no longer have 10.x-STABLE on
hard drive: updated to 11.0-STABLE.
Tom
__
> > NetBSD-current is on dhcpcd 7.0, ahead of FreeBSD ports version.
> 7.0.0 isn't released yet, it is in rc1:
> https://roy.marples.name/projects/dhcpcd
> FreeBSD is at the latest released version.
> Yuri
I saw after I sent that last message that dhcpcd 7.0 was at rc1, but didn't
check on wh
> I came across the WiFi router through which dhclient fails to obtain the IP
> address. It sets 0.0.0.0 and it stays this way,
> On the other hand, dhcpcd obtains the IP address almost instantly.
> Other routers mostly don't have such problem.
> Is dhclient not as robus
Who is the maintainer, if any, for re(4) Ethernet driver that is again giving
me trouble on Intel Ivy Bridge computer with MSI Z77 MPOWER motherboard?
I remember Kevin Lo, but have checked the web archives for freebsd-current and
freebsd-net, and find Kevin Lo's last posts were during October 20
I remember having problems with Realtek 8111E Ethernet on this Intel Ivy Bridge
computer a couple years ago, and now the problem has resurfaced.
I am fresh from updating FreeBSD to 11-STABLE and HEAD on two partitions, and
in both cases can not connect with onboard Ethernet.
>From NetBSD 7.99.1
, 20 minutes. a down/up cycle fixes it for a while. No
messages in dmesg or /var/log/messages.
Is this a known issue? Any suggestions I can try? Any other details needed?
Thanks!
/Thomas
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.
> I need to make couple of non-functional but rather large changes
> to the if_ndis driver and will appreciate if anyone signs up to
> test my changes. Please contact me if you can provide help.
> Totus tuus, Glebius.
I have two possible candidates for testing:
Hiro H50191 USB wi-fi adapter
ective though I really don't want traffic between jails
to be unfirewalled.
Can anyone shine a light on this? Thanks a bunch in advance :)
Best regards
Thomas Steen Rasmussen
ps. For what it's worth OpenBSD adds an lo0 route for IP aliases on
real interfaces to
> As part of the "opaque ifnet project" [1], we are doing some code shake
> with all IEEE802.11 (read WiFi) drivers. The drivers, that provide a parent
> interface for the wlan(4) interface.
> The core idea is that parent device loses its ifnet(9) structure. The
> code is already complete for
On 16-01-2015 09:03, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 14.01.2015 16:49, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> Can we please get a timeout option for ping6?
>>
>> There is a PR open for this:
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18378
take the patch or something similar
and commit it :)
Thanks!
/Thomas Steen Rasmussen
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:38:29 -0700, Russell L. Carter wrote:
> On the second suggestion:
>
> root@feyerabend> sysctl -a | grep dev.em | grep enable_
> root@feyerabend>
tmu:~$ sysctl -a | grep msix
hw.em.enable_msix: 1
hw.igb.enable_msix: 1
hw.ix.enable_msix: 1
[...]
Synopsis: [inet] [patch] in_pcbbind: redundant test
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: thomas
State-Changed-When: Thu May 1 09:26:05 UTC 2014
State-Changed-Why:
Fixed by np in rev. r245914 on 2013-01-25
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=149
Hello,
I've been trying to sort out an issue with relayd, and I'm just not having
any luck. I am setting up a new load-balancer using net/relayd
(5.4.20131122_2) on 10.0-RELEASE. My configuration is pretty simple; a pair
of web servers , sitting behind the relayd host. I have a httpd
instance runn
* Jimmy Olgeni, 2013-12-03 :
> I cannot imagine any obvious reason for packets getting "lost" after enc0,
> so any hint would be much appreciated :)
Chances are "netstat -s -p udp" will show you an increasing count of
packets with bad checksum. See PRs kern/14573
on here to separate the roles of firewalling and
routing? I have an extra set of hosts that could become firewalls,
making these hosts strictly routers. Would OpenBSD fare any better in
this scenario (thinking specifically of the pfsync "defer"
functionality)?
Thanks!
--
Thomas Johnson
Cla
On Aug 9, 2013, at 1:44 PM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:34:25PM +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
>> Steven,
>>
>> Steven Bellovin wrote:
>>> There's a one-word summary: *assurance*. With the current design,
>>> it's easy to *know* what can happen. With a Turi
t supported.
>
> That's what I wanted.
>
> Rainer.
Care to share ? :)
/Thomas
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
anyone have any suggestions on what I should look for, when this
happens again? Could this be related to reported CARP issues in 9.1, as
discussed on this list recently?
Thanks!
--
Thomas Johnson
--
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are
intended solely for the use
__func__));
tp->snd_cwnd = tp->snd_ssthresh +
tp->t_maxseg *
(tp->t_dupacks - tp->snd_limited);
<<<<<<&
Hi,
This is regarding a lock order reversal which is already reported in
http://ipv4.sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor/134.html.
Pasting the witness backtrace here:
lock order reversal
1st 0xc1787144 inp (raw6inp) @ sys/netinet6/icmp6.c:1895
2nd 0xc1788090 inp (rawinp) @ sys/netinet6/icmp6.c:1895
Le 9 nov. 2012 à 19:55, Alexander V. Chernikov a écrit :
> On 09.11.2012 20:51, Fabien Thomas wrote:
>>
>> Le 9 nov. 2012 à 17:43, Ingo Flaschberger a écrit :
>>
>>> Am 09.11.2012 15:03, schrieb Fabien Thomas:
>>>> In in_arpinput only exclusi
Le 9 nov. 2012 à 17:43, Ingo Flaschberger a écrit :
> Am 09.11.2012 15:03, schrieb Fabien Thomas:
>> In in_arpinput only exclusive access to the entry is taken during the update
>> no IF_AFDATA_LOCK that's why i was surprised.
>
> what about this:
I'm not aga
Le 9 nov. 2012 à 12:18, Alexander V. Chernikov a écrit :
> On 09.11.2012 13:59, Fabien Thomas wrote:
>>
>> Le 9 nov. 2012 à 10:05, Alexander V. Chernikov a écrit :
>>
>>> On 09.11.2012 12:51, Fabien Thomas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
Le 9 nov. 2012 à 10:05, Alexander V. Chernikov a écrit :
> On 09.11.2012 12:51, Fabien Thomas wrote:
>>
>> Le 8 nov. 2012 à 11:25, Alexander V. Chernikov a écrit :
>>
>>> On 08.11.2012 14:24, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>>>> On 08.11.2012 00:24, Alex
Le 8 nov. 2012 à 11:25, Alexander V. Chernikov a écrit :
> On 08.11.2012 14:24, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>> On 08.11.2012 00:24, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>>> Hello list!
>>>
>>> Currently we need to acquire 2 read locks to perform simple 6-byte
>>> copying from arp record to packet
>>> ethern
Le 18 oct. 2012 à 20:09, Jack Vogel a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
>> On 13.10.2012 20:22, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:49:21PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>>>
Hello list!
Packets receiving code for b
>>
>
> I have a patch that has been sitting around for a long time due to
> review cycle latency that caches a pointer to the rtentry (and
> llentry) in the the inpcb. Before each use the rtentry is checked
> against a generation number in the routing tree that is incremented on
> every routing t
Hello
Is there a 6RD patch for FreeBSD9? The only patch I see is for Freebsd8:
http://bougaidenpa.org/masakazu/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/freebsd8-6rd-20100130.patch.gz
Regards,
Thomas
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Le 22 févr. 2012 à 22:51, Jack Vogel a écrit :
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:09:46PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 21:52 +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>> ...
I have hit this problem recently, too.
Maybe the is
Hi,
I dont see the freebsd ip stack processing ICMP_UNREACH_NEEDFRAG where
protocol is ESP/AH. ( The ipsec4_common_ctlinput is not implemented). If
this is right, how is the PMTU discovery done for ipsec traffic or is it
that freebsd is not doing that?.
Thanks
Reji
_
ver found a solution. I use it as home firewall, so I
practically never reboot it, so I learned to live with it :)
Good luck with getting your problem solved!
Best regards
Thomas Steen Rasmussen
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
st things first, I need to buy a USB card with 802.11n support,
but is there any specific model or controller that needs testing,
or do I just get any atheros based 802.11n-card ? Any
recommendations ?
Thanks!
/Thomas Steen Rasmussen
___
freebsd-
Hi,
The key_do_allocsa_policy searches and deletes the non preferred sas if
there are multiple sas that match the search parameters . I see that if
there are multiple sas of same parameters established between end points,
this end up in deletion of all "outbound sa" but the preferred sa. Since
the
eeBSD 8.2-STABLE #1: Mon May 2 10:08:30 UTC 2011
rc.conf:
ipv6_enable="YES"
ipv6_defaultrouter="2001:1680:2:100::1"
ipv6_ifconfig_em0="2001:1680:2:100:2:120:a:b prefixlen 64"
ipv6_firewall_enable="YES"
ipv6_firewall_type="OPEN"
sysctl ist s
The following reply was made to PR kern/156408; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Thomas Johnson
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, t...@claimlynx.com
Cc:
Subject: re: kern/156408: [vlan] Routing failure when using VLANs vs. Physical
ethernet interfaces.
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:21:27 -0500
Sorry for the noise, i've missed the dest...
> Hi Kip,
>
> Feels good to see you again!
>
> Fabien
>
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-uns
Hi Kip,
Feels good to see you again!
Fabien
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Just an update to point to another old patch that enable flowtable on the
forwarding path to increase performance (reduce contention) to be on par with
Linux:
http://people.freebsd.org/~fabient/FreeBSDvsLinux10GB.png (forwarding 256B
packets, % to line rate on 2x10Gb 82599 interface with 1xXeon
On Feb 24, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Ryan Stone wrote:
> Ah, you've anticipated me. This is just the kind of thing that I had
> in mind. I have some comments:
Thanks for your feedback.
You pushed me from my laziness to explain the patchset on the ml. :)
>
> - Why allocate the poll_if_t in ether_poll
/work/pollng_mq_stable_8
Extracted patchset here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~fabient/patch-poll_mq-20110202-stable_8
http://people.freebsd.org/~fabient/kern_poll.c-20110202 -> put to
kern/kern_poll.c
--
Fabien Thomas
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-01-2011 14:21, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Thomas Steen Rasmussen writes:
>
>> Using lagg to bundle two uplinks to two different providers will
>> not work as you intend. You need to look into using pf or
>> something si
balance layer 3 traffic across two uplinks. I have had this running at
home for years with pf, and it works great.
Best regards
Thomas Steen Rasmussen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk0q
On Dec 22, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On 21.12.2010 21:57, Fabien Thomas wrote:
>
>>> irq262: igb0:que 0 157354922 7927
>>> irq263: igb0:que 1577369 29
>>> irq264: igb0:que 2280207
On Dec 21, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On 21.12.2010 20:41, Fabien Thomas wrote:
>
>>>>> 1. Is it a bug or design problem?
>>>>
>>>> How many queues have you with igb? If it's one it will explain why the
>>>> flow
On Dec 21, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On 21.12.2010 19:11, Fabien Thomas wrote:
>
>>>> I had this problem with igb driver, and I found, that lagg selects
>>>> outgoing interface based on packet header flowid field if M_FLOWID field
>>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I've loaded router using two lagg interfaces in LACP mode.
>>> lagg0 has IP address and two ports (em0 and em1) and carry untagged frames.
>>> lagg1 has no IP address and has two ports (igb0 and igb1) and carry
>>> about 1000 dot-q vlans with lots of hosts in each vlan.
>>>
>>> Fo
On Dec 18, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've loaded router using two lagg interfaces in LACP mode.
> lagg0 has IP address and two ports (em0 and em1) and carry untagged frames.
> lagg1 has no IP address and has two ports (igb0 and igb1) and carry
> about 1000 dot-q vlans
Hi
is there a limit of entries in IPv6 kernel routing table?
Regards,
Thomas
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
That fix on ixgbe would also be great to commit on ixgbe before release.
This fix a crash on high packet load with bpf (mbuf freed behind bpf analysis).
Fabien
patch-ixgbe-bpfcrash
Description: Binary data
>
> On 17.11.2010 23:39, Jack Vogel wrote:
>> Yes, everyone, I plan on updating all the
Le 21 oct. 10 à 19:04, Julian Elischer a écrit :
On 10/21/10 8:26 AM, Thomas Sevestre wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using freebsd 8 as a router. Say I have a sis0 interface. The
interface is up and negociated, Ethernet LEDs are fine.
Some
o you have any idea of what the problem could be?
May be a link-layer driver bug?
Thanks,
Thomas
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 14 sept. 2010, at 17:41, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 14.09.2010 11:18, Fabien Thomas wrote:
>> Great,
>>
>> This will maybe kill the long time debate about "my loopback is slow vs
>> linux"
>> To have the best of both world what about a socket opt
Great,
This will maybe kill the long time debate about "my loopback is slow vs linux"
To have the best of both world what about a socket option to enable/disable
fusing:
can be useful when you need to see some connection "packetized".
Fabien
On 13 sept. 2010, at 13:33, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
Hi all,
While doing some 10Gb benchmark i've found that m_getjcl does not benefit from
the packet zone.
There is a ~ 80% increase in FPS when applying the following patch.
256B frame driver to driver / stable_8:
- 3 765 066 FPS
- 6 868 153 FPS with the patch applied.
Is there a good rea
Hi,
I have a few servers on a vlan which have all happily auto configured
via RA, both FreeBSD and CentOS boxes. However, I freshly installed a
FreeBSD 7 box, brought it to stable, and it wont auto configure.
I'm kind of at a loss at what could be the issue. Anyone have ideas on
where to sta
ot wheel512 Mar 11 10:55 binding
-rw--- 1 root wheel 73770 Mar 11 11:45 master.passwd
-rw--- 1 root wheel 69260 Mar 11 11:45 passwd
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel233 Mar 11 10:53 securenets
drwx-- 2 root wheel512 Mar 11 11:45 myusers
-rw--
need any of my configs! By the way, my v6 uplink on
said firewalls is 6to4, not naitive v6 like you seem to have access
to (lucky you!) :)
Best regards,
Thomas Rasmussen
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/
ho i can figure out whats running on port 1000 with ipv6? Only
the loopback interface has an ipv6 address.
System:
FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p4 amd64
Regards,
Thomas
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
=
This happens on Freebsd 6-7-8 on all machines I have access to.
The error message is confusing and suggests there is a problem writing
to the routing table which is not what I am doing at all.
Is this a bug, or can somebody offer an explanation
Thanks very useful!
Do you have an "official" page to look for update.
What do you think of putting it on the FreeBSD Wiki?
Fabien
Le 20 août 09 à 18:17, Julian Elischer a écrit :
there were some people looking at adding vnet support to pf.
Since we discussed it last, the rules of the game hav
I have done at work modification to the polling
code to do SMP polling (previously posted to this ml).
SMP polling (dynamic group of interface binded to
CPU) does not significantly improve the throughput (lock
contention seems to be the cause here).
The main advantage of polling with modern
Le 28 avr. 09 à 11:04, Paolo Pisati a écrit :
Fabien Thomas wrote:
To share my results:
I have done at work modification to the polling code to do SMP
polling (previously posted to this ml).
SMP polling (dynamic group of interface binded to CPU) does not
significantly improve the
To share my results:
I have done at work modification to the polling code to do SMP polling
(previously posted to this ml).
SMP polling (dynamic group of interface binded to CPU) does not
significantly improve the throughput (lock contention seems to be the
cause here).
The main advantag
)
Can anyone provide any feedback or procedural guidance on how I can
(for
example):
- ensure that lo1, lo2-lo14 are created at boot
- ensure that disc0 is created at boot, with an assigned IPv4 and IPv6
address
cloned_interfaces="lo1 lo2 lo3"
Hi Kip,
I am currently using NATM on FreeBSD/sparc64 with FORE PCA-200E
boards. It is a little buggy but it works and I am hoping to continue
along with it as long as I can. :)
-Sean
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
Sorry for the noise...
I've made a mistake with my local patch vs cvsweb vs commit info that
seems to fix the same problem but with another code.
If i've to rewrite my initial mail:
The fxp deadlock (fixed on head by this commit
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c.diff?r1=1.217.2.15;r2=1.217.2.16;f=h
This fix is really necessary (dealock of the interface in case of
cluster shortage) and not commited in 6.x (but commited in RELENG_5
RELENG_7 and HEAD)
Regards,
Fabien
Hello
Am 15.07.2008 um 22:59 schrieb JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉:
At Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:54:11 +0200,
Thomas Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since i updated my FreeBSD 6.3 dns server with the latest bind
version
in the ports (dns/bind94) my system is flooding my log with "too
many
Hello
Am 15.07.2008 um 20:12 schrieb JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉:
At Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:13:11 +0200,
Thomas Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since i updated my FreeBSD 6.3 dns server with the latest bind
version
in the ports (dns/bind94) my system is flooding my log with "too man
requests for sfbufs delayed
0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile
105 calls to protocol drain routines
Regards,
Thomas
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
For your information we have mesured 730Kpps using pollng and
fastforwarding
with 64bits frame without loss (<0.001% packet loss) on a Spirent
Smarbits (Pentium D 2.8GHZ + 8xGig em)
You can find the code / and some performance report at :
http://www.netasq.com/opensource/pollng-rev1-freebsd.
but what a behemoth. I
> can't imagine that thing running reliably.
The only stability problems I've experience have been the occasional
lockup using PowerNow since migrating from dual single core to dual dual
core.
--
Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst
http://hur.st/
_
19 Mar 2008 23:41:47 +0100
Benjamin Close skrev:
> Hi Thomas,
>Are you able to attach a recent patch rather than inling it - I'll
> see what I can do to test/get it merged.
Hi Benjamin!
I tried to attach the updated patch the last time but it seems that
something got
The following reply was made to PR kern/118975; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_Nystr=F6m?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/118975: [bge] [patch] Broadcom 5906 not handled by FreeBSD
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 20:35:04 +0100
equalizer issue but it seems that Rx error recovery and link state
> change handling needs to be rewritten.
I can send you one if it would be helpful? There's 2 in this machine
and I'm pretty sure I have a third somewhere..
--
Thomas
The following reply was made to PR kern/64556; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Thomas Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/64556: [sis] if_sis short cable fix problems with NetGear
FA311's
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 20
The following reply was made to PR kern/64556; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Thomas Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/64556: [sis] if_sis short cable fix problems with NetGear
FA311's
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 20
Result of pcap benchmark requested by Vlad Galu:
Using polling is better.
Test setup:
---
netblast -- em|fxp -- pcap_bmark
under FreeBSD 6.2
Small product (fxp interface):
---
pollng:
Captured 30322.00 pps (total of 333542) and dropped 144
Cap
Hello Fabien,
Hello :)
1- I have noticed you are not using GENERIC config file, can you
provide us more information on how your KERNCONF differs from
GENERIC ?
I am pretty sure you have removed all the debug OPTIONs from the
kernel, isn't it ?
It's a GENERIC kernel conf with polling an
Haven't tested RELENG_4 performance in a controlled environment and
thus can't answer the question directly. However using fastforward
on 6 and 7 is key to good performance. Without it you're stuck at
some 150-200kpps, perhaps 300kpps. With it you get to 500-800kpps.
To show that pps is mai
Le 8 sept. 07 à 01:05, Andre Oppermann a écrit :
Mike Tancsa wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 15:12:06 +0200, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
wrote:
After many years of good services we will stop using FreeBSD 4.x :)
During my performance regression tests under FreeBSD 6.2 i've
found that polling
Hi,
This is really interesting work! Reading the pdf file, it
seems forwarding performance on 6 and 7 is still much lower than
RELENG_4 ? is that correct ?
---Mike
Thanks,
Yes it is still slower but as you can see in the graph (programming
cost) just adding a mutex
drop th
Hi,
After many years of good services we will stop using FreeBSD 4.x :)
During my performance regression tests under FreeBSD 6.2 i've found
that polling has lower performance than interrupt.
To solve that issue i've rewritten the core of polling to be more SMP
ready.
You can find a
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
