> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: sth...@nethelp.no [mailto:sth...@nethelp.no]
> Skickat: den 13 oktober 2010 11:32
> Till: Jon Otterholm
> Kopia: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Ämne: Re: VPLS implementation
>
> > > Are there any plans or ongoing work to
Are there any plans or ongoing work to implement VPLS in the network
stack?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Private_LAN_Service
//JO
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscrib
Den 2010-03-23 19.36, skrev "Jon Otterholm"
:
>
>
>
> Den 2010-03-23 14.12, skrev "Ivan Voras" :
>
>> On 03/18/10 01:32, Andrew Snow wrote:
>>>
>>> Jon Otterholm wrote:
>>>> This machine is going to act as access-ro
Den 2010-03-23 14.12, skrev "Ivan Voras" :
> On 03/18/10 01:32, Andrew Snow wrote:
>>
>> Jon Otterholm wrote:
>>> This machine is going to act as access-router serving ~500
>>> FTTH-customers.
>>> About 500Mbit/s and 200kpps. The big i
_
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
This machine is going to act as access-router serving ~500 FTTH-customers.
A
IPFW and Dummynet for traffic-shaping. Along with
that, standard services like dhcpd.
Any thoughts appreciated.
BG
//Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On 2009-12-11 20.23, "Mike Tancsa" wrote:
> At 11:33 AM 12/11/2009, David DeSimone wrote:
>> Jon Otterholm wrote:
>>>
>>> If I restart racoon or wait approximately 30 min the connection is
>>> re-established.
>>
>> Since this is
On 2009-12-11 20.23, "Mike Tancsa" wrote:
> At 11:33 AM 12/11/2009, David DeSimone wrote:
>> Jon Otterholm wrote:
>>>
>>> If I restart racoon or wait approximately 30 min the connection is
>>> re-established.
>>
>> Since this is
11 dec 2009 kl. 17.34 skrev "David DeSimone" :
Jon Otterholm wrote:
If I restart racoon or wait approximately 30 min the connection is
re-established.
Since this is approximately ½of the phase 2 lifetime, you are proba
bly
running into lifetime negotiation issues, or
n what to
tweak appreciated.
//Jon
Info:
Keying: IKE PSK
Phase1:
encryption: DES
Authentication: MD5
SA Lifetime: 28800 seconds
Phase2:
Encryption: DES
Authentication: MD5
SA Lifetime: 3600 seconds
racoon.conf:
pathpre_shared_key "/usr/local/etc/racoon/ps
Doing some test of gred in dummynet. My ruleset consists of a number of
queues connected to the same pipe. Queues have different weight and I
want to make use of gred instead of taildrop.
Should i define gred on the queues or on the pipe? To me it seems
reasonable to set it on the pipe and let
On 2009-04-19 11.14, "Robert Watson" wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Apr 2009, Jon Otterholm wrote:
>
>> I have a router running 6.4R that does not forward packets if I disable
>> PROMISC on the interface. Hardware is a Dell PE with two Intel 82541EI
>> chipsets (if_e
Hi.
I have a router running 6.4R that does not forward packets if I disable
PROMISC on the interface.
Hardware is a Dell PE with two Intel 82541EI chipsets (if_em). I have a
number (~100) of vlan-interfaces on em0. Everything works as aexpected if I
turn on PROMISC on em0 but forwarding stops if I
On 2008-11-06 11.47, "Peter Jeremy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-Nov-06 10:06:21 +0100, Jon Otterholm
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is it possible to tweak CARP to use the virtual MAC in L2 header instead of
>> the physical interface MAC
it possible to tweak CARP to use the virtual MAC in L2 header instead of
the physical interface MAC? Could this be implemented as a feature
controlled by a sysctl?
//Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
Hi.
Are there any plans to implement option carpdev to carp in FreeBSD?
//Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi.
Has anyone got a solution to the rdr-problem when using PF together with
Dummynet/IPFW?
I found this thread from 2006 which describes the problem in detail:
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/net/2006-07/msg00048.html
//Jon
2008/3/23, Jon Theil Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi list!
>
> I have speculated a lot about implementation of (Open)LDAP on my
> sever. By I haven't yet found the right (and logical) way to do it.
> I'm running FreeBSD 7.0-Release with some different ser
different implimentions.
Excuse my total lack of understanding, but is it possible to have a
structure with a superior unit such as OU= which
could contain several virtual domains and the actual doamin for my
PDC?
--
Jon Theil Nielsen
___
freebsd-net@f
ething I can use to
authenticate outside users to my (VPN) server.
Regards,
Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
e done by installing a Radius server to communicate with
> > Mpd,
> > but that seems to be unnessesarily complicated.
> > Does anyone know the "best" solution to achieve the goal?
>
You migth be right about trying (again) with ppp. I just
Radius server to communicate with Mpd,
but that seems to be unnessesarily complicated.
Does anyone know the "best" solution to achieve the goal?
Regards,
Jon Theil Nielsen
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
Hi.
I was wondering about the possibility of adding support for QinQ
("Double tagged frames" / "Nested vlans"). Attached is a patch against
-STABLE to add this support. I have not tested this but was told it
should work.
Would it be possible to get this into CURRENT?
//Jo
drawbacks be if I create ~1500 if_bridge and attached
each vlan-sub-if from each physical interface to their own bridge? Would
this work?
//Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe
usy":
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/user]# ifconfig vlan100 destroy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/user]# ifconfig vlan100 create
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/user]# ifconfig vlan100 vlan 100 vlandev em1
ifconfig: SIOCSETVLAN: Device busy
Motherboard is Supermicro PDSMi-LN4+ with four em-
Hi.
It seems that filtering on member interfaces are a bit buggy at the moment.
For testing I tried to use the following 3 rules to block traffic using PF:
The following works and blocks traffic:
block log quick on bridge0 from xx.xx.xx.xx to any
The following does not work:
block log quick on
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Aug 13, 2007, at 7:34 AM, Jon Otterholm wrote:
I have a problem with proxy-arp entries.
If I add an arp-entry:
arp -s $hostip $routermac permanent pub only
the router sends an arp and replies to it's own arp like:
15:40:02.074419 arp who-has $hostip tell $hostip
ction? IMHO the router
should only answer to arp for $hostip to other clients than the one that
actually have the ip-address.
//Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any ma
ip.forwarding=1
In detail the problem is related to dhcpd working an if_bridge.
I know that if_bridge handles arp/revarp in a different manner than
other traffic to ethernet broadcast, could this be a bug?
//Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org ma
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2007-Mar-21 22:08:06 +0100, Jon Otterholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I did not mention earlier that all if's are vlan-based sub-intefaces. It
seems that if I move admin-if's on my routers to a different physical if
than the one with the default route
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Mar 20, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Jon Otterholm wrote:
When setting net.inet.ip.redirect=0 on my routers, the icmp-redirects
disappear, but instead I get a large amount of ICMP-time-exceed
from my
routers.
The information you've provided strongly suggests either pro
92.168.1.68 > 192.168.1.54: ICMP time exceeded
in-transit, length 36
for about 3300 lines. This is my routers answering.
192.168.41.54 is a HP420 WLAN-AP. I get the same behavior from other
equipment on my admin-lan including FreeBSD-machines.
If someone could give me a hint to where to sta
Jack Vogel wrote:
On 1/16/07, Jon Otterholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 1/16/07, Jon Otterholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I have trouble with high latency on my new X60 with em-interface.
Anyone
>> else with th
Jack Vogel wrote:
On 1/16/07, Jon Otterholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi.
I have trouble with high latency on my new X60 with em-interface. Anyone
else with the same problem? I´m running 6.2-RELEASE.
Would you please give a bit more detail.
Jack
Here comes some info:
uname -a
F
Hi.
I have trouble with high latency on my new X60 with em-interface. Anyone
else with the same problem? I´m running 6.2-RELEASE.
//Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 12:15:13PM +0200, Jon Otterholm wrote:
Hi.
I have a bridge setup with a number of vlan IF's as members. After a
while traffic destined for one member IF are sent to all member IF's.
From man if_bridge:
A bridge works
# uname -a
FreeBSD hostname.domain.com 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #2:
Fri Sep 15 13:26:01 CEST 2006 user@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
/Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To u
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 04:23:07PM +0200, Jon Otterholm wrote:
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:30:21AM +0200, Jon Otterholm wrote:
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 08:19:41PM +0200, Jon Otterholm wrote
:04:23:bd:23:42
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX )
status: active
vlan: 10 parent interface: em0
ARP-broadcast can still travel between member IFs in bridge0.
Have I missed something here? Do I have to use bridge instead of if_bridge?
/Jon
-broadcast between memeber-ifs?
/Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi.
I am searching for a BSD-based CNR replacement. CNR (Cisco Network
Registrar) is basicly a DHCP server that puts IF-routes on a router when
a client has leased an IP-address. When the lease expires the IF-route
is removed from the router.
This functionality together with IP-less VLAN-IF'
Hi.
I am designing a new network and one way to go is to configure a router
based on FreeBSD with one IF/customer. This would mean around 1000
VLAN-IF's/router - would this work? Do you see any problems with this?
/Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebs
Hi.
Has anyone information about the sysctl "net.link.ether.inet.proxyall" ?
Is this a global ARP-Proxy? Does it apply on a bridge or if_bridge?
/Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
you could use some kind of RADIUS
authentication (MAC/user/computer/??).
Dlink 3526/3550 have these functions. In addition you could lock down
the switch so that "user-ports" only could talk to the uplink port and
never with each ot
ful use of anchors
and some scripting (or ifstated which might be in ports) can move
traffic off failed links or respond to changing loads.
I've done a lot with both ipfw and PF now, and I'm finding PF to be
more flexible for my uses.
--
Jon Simola
Sys
its already seperated, otherwise it has to figure it out by
looking in the header for the presence of the ETHERTYPE_VLAN tag.
Hope that helps you out.
--
Jon Simola
Systems Administrator
ABC Communications
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
, please write a subnet declaration
in your dhcpd.conf file for the network segment
to which interface bge0 is attached. **
Not configured to listen on any interfaces!
su-2.05b#
How can i make it start up without a declaration for the local subnets?
/Jon
Hi!
What is there to gain in performance choosing AMD64 on a Dell PE1850
(Xeon EMT64) when used as router?
/Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[
I am reading 'soisconnected' function in 'Uipc_socket2.c' file.
I find this lines. But I cannot find accf's mean. can you explain to me?thank
you very much!
if ((so->so_options & SO_ACCEPTFILTER) == 0) {
...
} else {
ACCEPT_UNLOCK();
SOCK_LOCK(so);
so->so_upcall =
head->so_
NET_LOCK_GIANT();
error = socreate(uap->domain, &so, uap->type, uap->protocol,
td->td_ucred, td);
NET_UNLOCK_GIANT();
if (error) {
fdclose(fdp, fp, fd, td);
} else {
FILEDESC_LOCK_FAST(fdp);
fp->f_data = so; /* already has ref count */
fp->f_flag = FREAD|FWRITE;
fp->f_ops = &soc
I think they do that when using standard 802.1Q, but for some reason
theey don't when running QinQ...
/Jon
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 13:00 +, Brian Candler wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 01:45:44PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> > The reason why I have to proxy-arp mac between VLA
You got it all right.
Antispoof sounds nice.
The reason why I have to proxy-arp mac between VLANs is that one mac
cannot end up mapped to more than one port in the switches FDB. If they
do - we get something called "host-flapping" on IOS-language.
/Jon
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 11:28 +0
her if" acting as
gateway, distrute IP's via DHCP (ISC?) I could reduce the number of IP's
and administration when adding new customers.
Anyone with a souloution or revelation?
/Jon
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 15:23 +, Brian Candler wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:06:03PM +0100
The linux-soloution you are describeing is exactly what I want to do.
Not a big fan of Linux though. I will have to wait for this to be ported
to BSD. Anyone with info if this is being done?
/Jon
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 14:57 +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Hi, Jon, Brian,
>
> >
I offten discover what such "/* XXX */ " annotate in source code of
freebsd。what mean is "XXX"?
think you very much!___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Jon
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 5:15 PM
Subject: hello, everybody
i'm reading TCP/IP source code.but i do not understand this function,
tcp_timer_2msl_tw. what mean is "tw"? who can
outer.
/Jon
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] genom Mike Silbersack
Skickat: lö 11/12/2005 8:21
Till: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Ämne: Testing with a Cisco router
Does anyone have a Cisco router running an up to date version of IOS that
they would be willing to run
understand why Alcatel has put this limitaion in their DSLAM's.
Their answer is that it prevents spoofing. I would accept this as a
feature but not as a limitation...
/J
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 13:39 +, Brian Candler wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 02:25:07PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
>
src to its own
mac.
I hope this makes it clear.
/J
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 12:49 +, Brian Candler wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 02:06:28PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> > I want to create a bridge-interface (if_bridge) with a bunch (500+) of
> > sub-interfaces (vlan) as memb
vlan. My thought is to set up a arp-proxy that handles this but i
cant find any info on how to do this on a FreeBSD-box (preferably
6.0-RELEASE).
Is there anyone with a working soloution in real or theory?
Any general thoughts or feedback on this is ar
Hi.
Does anyone know if if_bridge supports vlan-interfaces?
/Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
#x27;m not sure how
polite pcap is about leaving dangling bpf devices.
--
Jon Simola
Systems Administrator
ABC Communications
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
he MAC of my upstream router, stopping my network dead. I have
to become very agressive with layer2 filtering with ipfw to keep the
bridge from seeing packets on the wrong interface.
--
Jon Simola
Systems Administrator
ABC Communications
___
freebsd-net@f
0).
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sysctl -a | grep kern.polling
> >>kern.polling.handlers: 0
No handlers? On all my boxes I've got one handler per polled device.
--
Jon Simola
Systems Administrator
ABC Communications
___
freebsd-net
uid on separate IP addresses with each IP address
using one of the T1s as the gateway. That way I could force my power
users through one connection and everyone else through the other while
still gaining the benefit of caching everything for everyone. It's
probably needlessly complicat
> > On Sunday 13 February 2005 22:36, David Gilbert wrote:
> >> Has anyone considered patching the vlan driver to support altq? I
> >> gather that since tun works, so should vlan.
>
> Well... the issue is several fold. Firstly, the router in question is
> talking in trunk mode to a switch which i
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:18:05 -0500, Michael W. Oliver
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> subject sums it up. will be used in small firewall boxes with WAN, LAN,
> DMZ, and WLAN (via x-over to AP) connections. older hardware, so
> please, no fancy super-duper mega-bandwidth PCI cards that I won't have
>
mp on either em1 or one of the vlan interfaces reduces
throughput by a factor of 10 or so. Running tcpdump with the -p option
does not.
This is a steady stream of 10 to 20 Mbps of traffic, routing 11 /24s
over 4 vlans, kernel polling is enabled for the em devices.
Thank you,
Jon Simola
Systems Administ
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:01:52 -0800, Charlie Schluting
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, in 5.3, the only thing I can get working is to configure the em0 int with
> the IP, and set the trunk to have the native vlan corresponding to that IP.
> Weird.
Sounds like you're not getting the module loade
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:07:54 +0100, Andrew Seguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the help, in pointing out the mask feature to me from Jon Simola, this
> quite possibly might be the path I'll take (I'll sleep on it first).
> Interfaces are 100Mbps, but our interne
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:41:16 +0100, Andrew Seguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What I was doing with the same setup:
> >$IPFW pipe 1 config mask src-ip 0x buckets 512
> >$IPFW pipe 2 config mask dst-ip 0x buckets 512
> >$IPFW add 32001 pipe 1 src-ip 192.168.110.0/24 bridged
> >$IP
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:11:13 +0100, Andrew Seguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But, here's my situation. A dedicated FreeBSD transparent firewall-bridge
> with 3 NICs (two for the bridge w/o IP, one for console). I'm using IPFW for
> the firewall, and at the moment I'm doing some very bare-bones s
OCK(&ifp->if_snd);
+ }
+
ifv = ifp->if_softc;
p = ifv->ifv_p;
ifp->if_flags |= IFF_OACTIVE;
for (;;) {
- IF_DEQUEUE(&ifp->if_snd, m);
+ IFQ_DEQUEUE(&ifp->if_snd, m);
if (m == 0)
ot have any symbolic links in them and should not
have any "." or ".." components."
Therefore you may need to export /usr/home instead of /home. This works
wonderfully for me (although my clients are FreeBSD as well).
Jon
__
ce of RELENG_4 is good
for everyone, and those interested most likely have stability as their
first priority anyway (because otherwise they wouldn't be using RELENG_4).
Regardless, the original work was done on RELENG_4 and ported to -CURRENT:
http://lists.freeb
Has anyone looked at kern/68110?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/68110
Jon Noack
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
covered many timing
related issues with our product. Handling modem clients gracefully was
the hardest part, and made me feel a bit nostalgic; using a simulated
modem link was just as frustrating as the real thing!
Jon Noack
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ma
hile (actually every
5-10 minutes) rtg/net-snmp would do an snmp get using port 1812 which the
system had given to it, but radiusd would end up getting the results. This
causes indigestion in radiusd...
Since I spent quite a bit of time running this down today I figured I'd
share w
Hi.
I'm trying to merge two "servers", one of them is only a NAT-router for
the rest of the LAN another one is a host without NAT that needs a
unique IP. I have 3 network interfaces on the other. I want that to take
over the NAT-routing, but I need to use one network device to that
server, and
A couple of thoughts:
Is your client employing ipsec/isakmp?
If so, has your client ensured that the setkey -P entries
have been pushed into the kernel?
Correct me if i'm wrong, but from (a foggy) memory
GRE in a tunnel mode such as this, employs the gif
device, is the routing/firewalling allowi
atabase of the stats, via a cron job.
Cheers,
Jon Newson - Systems Administrator
SDR Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ian Freislich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 5:54 PM
To: Lars Eggert
Cc: Adam; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bandwidth
nt to make sure as I
go forward with the Web100 code that I lock it appropriately.
Thanks,
Jon
--
Jon Dugan | Senior Network Engineer, NCSA Network Research
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 269 CAB, 605 E Springfield, Champaign, IL 61820
217-244-7715 | http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/~j
process. Information gleaned from the KIS is also useful to diagnosing
many common problems with TCP performance. The Web100 website has further
information, including the code for the Linux implmentation and an IETF
draft of the TCP Extended Statistic MIB. http://www.web100.org/
J
At 01:22 PM 11/22/2002, Archie Cobbs wrote:
Try adding these lines to mpd.conf and see if they help:
set iface mtu 1440
set ccp yes mpp-stateless
i already had the second one in there, but i added the first and it has
totally fixed the problem. thanks archie!
-jsd-
To Unsubscribe:
i'm using mpd to connect to my work's VPN, running some form of windows vpn
server. unfortunately performance is really miserable. it seems to work
fine for tiny transmissions (1K or less) but anything over that stutters,
and if it's a big data dump (like scp'ing a 30K file or receiving email
UH 00lo0
Notice that the 10/24 subnet is listed, but not the 10.0.0.1 IP number.
The Routing section of the FreeBSD Handbook alludes to being able
to do this, so I assume it's possible. I just don't know what's wrong.
Help!?
-Jon
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 07:45:07AM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
>
> [ ... Description of modifying a bidrectional ring ... ]
>
> So I guess that what we're dealing with isn't really a
> "monodirectional" ring. Right?
Yep. =)
--
Jonathan Mini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.freebsd.org/
To Un
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:41:04PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > That's a cool idea.. haven't looked at NetBSD but am imagining the
> > mbufs would be linked in a 'ring'. This works because you never
> > care how many references are, just whether there's one or more than
> > one, and this is
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 01:14:21PM -0700, Juli Mallett wrote:
> * De: Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-07-07 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: the incredible shrinking socket ]
> >
> > On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > > Some time ago I noticed that there appeared to be
can a 3com pcmcia nic be put in promiscuous mode? if so what models? thanks-- Jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
my company recently switched from a nortel vpn system to a radius based
scheme that is very windows-centric. i had no problems connecting to the
nortel using pptpclient (from the ports).
now it seems i'm being thrown by ms-chap authentication. i don't really
know how to set this up. as far
I just did a totally fresh install of 4.4-RELEASE on a brand new machine -
totally blank unpartitioned hard disks.
The installation appeared to go smoothly until I got to the "set root
password" phase, at which point the installer hung. I aborted out of that
and booted up from the new install
92 matches
Mail list logo
