hi
the rule of ipfw is kind of semantic, and it is powerful. so it means good
for normal users. but not for developers of it, because simplicity actually
is hidden complexity.that is the reason developers fulfilled so many rule
options to match the traffic. and the man page of ipfw becomes long lo
Sorry I am little bit blur now. And I am going to wait for your code, I
think it will be a good opportunity to learn as a newbie here.
1. So use alphanumeric strings for table's id is not a good way. (because
will loose atomicity). I agree that, all this feature/function, I would
like to name them
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Bill Yuan wrote:
>
>> 1. "each table can have it's own name", I like this idea. I am also
>> working on this kind of functions, But I am in different way. In
Hi Alex,
You guys are chatting here! I agree with you, the table is the place should
be enhanced, and I am working in this way as described below
1. Support more types.
ip : cidr
ipv4 : same as ip
ipv6 : ip addr v6
mac : mac address
iface : interface name
interface : same as iface
por
From: Julian Elischer
To: Коньков Евгений
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2012 2:15 AM
Subject: Re: HowTo easy use IPFW
On 2/4/12 10:53 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 2/2/12 1:33 AM, Коньков Евгений wrote:
>> this is the mine script whic
out though.
I appreciate you helping out on this.
Thank you,
Bill Norton
From: YongHyeon PYUN
To: Bill Norton
Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" ; j...@freebsd.org
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2012 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: bge0 interface seen but not worki
(see
155442) and the driver will be fixed in 8.3.
Any ideas?
Bill Norton
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi All,
I have a couple Chelsio T304 quad gigabit nics that are going into
iscsi servers. I got these for the TOE capabilities, but I found in
the cxgb driver code that it is explicitly disabled for > 2 port nics
(line 1036 : /usr/src/sys/dev/cxgb/cxgb_main.c) . The current cxgb
driver is based on
to 30-50% of those requirements are arbitrary anyway ...
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
wmo...@collaborativefusion.com
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information
and is intended only for
capacity of rules supported, therefore
> simultaneous user.
>
> Understand ?
If you're only doing allow, then you'd be better off using a table,
which has much better performance than a bunch of separate rules.
If you're counting packets, I don't know if that approach w
.inet.ip.fw.verbose: 1
> net.inet.ip.fw.debug: 0
> net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass: 1
> net.inet.ip.fw.autoinc_step: 100
> net.inet.ip.fw.enable: 1
> net.link.ether.ipfw: 1
> net.link.bridge.ipfw: 0
> net.link.bridge.ipfw_arp: 0
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel
> ___
> freebsd-net@freebs
only
> exist in either local network, or remote VPN'ed network) to go through
> the tun0 device?
Any hack you would do to make this work is going to be unreliable at best.
Renumber your network so that routing can work as designed.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
http://people.
In response to Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to R J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> I am trying to use tcpdump (or snort, but they are both behaving the same
> >> in this case) to capture all the lines or cont
half of a sentence, and I don't see the rest of the lines.
> And ofcourse, alot of it seems to be hex or obfuscated html?
>
> What switches do I need to capture the entire lines of text?
Don't know about snort, but with tcpdump use -s0
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion
it's not a
managed switch, replace it because it's not working correctly and there's
nothing you can do about it.
> 3. Should i ever bother about this issue?
Yes. Something is wrong and it will be hurting your network performance.
--
You mention no details about your
local network, but I would guess that you have two separate IP ranges
on a single segment. Has the "attack" ended? If not, grab some tcpdumps
and see who's actually sending those packets.
What IP address does this machine have? What's the net
Eygene Ryabinkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the education! I have only one question: what it 'Yugo'?
> I had not found it in nearby dictionaries ;))
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yugo
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In response to Eygene Ryabinkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 05:06:42PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> > > I had faced such situation once: I had multihomed host that was
> > > running Apache daemon that was announced via two DNS names that
> > > wer
In response to Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Eygene Ryabinkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> Bill,
> >>
> >> Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 04:36:18PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> >>> I woul
In response to Eygene Ryabinkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill,
>
> Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 04:36:18PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> > I would suggest you ask yourself (and possibly the list) _why_ you think
> > multiple default routes is necessary ... what is it that you&
k yourself (and possibly the list) _why_ you think
multiple default routes is necessary ... what is it that you're hoping
to accomplish. I'm guessing your looking for some sort of redundancy,
in which case something like CARP or RIP is liable to be the correct
solution.
--
Bill Moran
Co
Michael DeMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> unsubscribe
As mentioned in the footer of every list mail:
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ace the faulty wiring. Just because it _seems_ to be OK
at 100 doesn't mean it is. If it's unable to work reliably at a
speed it should work at, you need to fix that.
b) Force the speed/duplex on both ends. One of the ugliest networking
problems I've seen is when the
he FreeBSD driver as well.
-Bill
--
=
-Bill Paul(510) 749-2329 | Senior Engineer, Master of Unix-Fu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Wind Riv
t with no change in
> results. I have removed the machine at 10.11.12.252 with the only change
> being that the file-server can obtain NO connection to ANY IP address.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
Why don't your cut/paste the output of ifconfig -a and netstat -rn
I suspect
st use a script like here :
The protocols designed to handle this are things like RIP and BGP.
However, in a case like yours, where you control both ends of things,
it's probably better to just use a script.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 412-422-3463x4
In response to David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Let's flip the question around a bit: why would you _want_ the TCP
> > stack to accept frames
In response to Stephen Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill Moran wrote:
>
> >In response to Stephen Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >>Sten Daniel Soersdal wrote:
> >>
> >>>Stephen Clark wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
460 it get silently dropped. connection
> stalls.
>
> --
>
> "They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety,
> deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin)
>
> "The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty
>
In response to Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In response to Adam McDougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:19:49AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> >
> >
> > This one has got me pretty befuddled.
> >
> > We
ot using
non-blocking IO in the manner it was intended.
If you want properly closed connections, you turn of non-blocking before
you close the connection. If you want fast close that's not contingent on
anything, you close non-blocking and accept that some data may be lost and
some errors
In response to Adam McDougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:19:49AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
>
>
> This one has got me pretty befuddled.
>
> We're seeing some really odd behaviour with FreeBSD ignoring SYN packets.
> I've been
against a server with FreeBSD-current (the future 7.0) on
> it. In -current we've got detailed logging of LISTEN socket
> failures that allow rapid analysis of the problem.
This will take some time.
Also, I'm not seeing the problem on other, similar hardware. I'
Brief update to add another item to the list of things I've tried:
*) The problem occurs whether the em device is polling or not.
In response to Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> This one has got me pretty befuddled.
>
> We're seeing some really odd behaviour with
0MB (71024640 sectors) RAID 1 (optimal)
SMP: AP CPU #3 Launched!
SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!
SMP: AP CPU #2 Launched!
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/amrd0s1a
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
__
Forwarding to -net to get a larger audience. Any help would be
appreciated. Thanks
--Bill
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Apr 17, 2007 12:25 PM
Subject: ng_tag and pf?
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
omains hosted on the
> server use a.a.a.b and a.a.a.c!
> So basically I can't figure out what's up as .d works fine..anyone able to
> help me with some suggestions of where to look for fixing .b and .c?
You showed up your rc.conf.
What might be more helpful is the o
s of rate limiting
traffic in the base system, so the tbf hack can and should just die.
Just return an error when trying to create a vif with a rate limit.
Bill
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To
x27;s the solution that should be committed, but
I think that may get you what you need (and the fix should be
the same across any FreeBSD version, as long as you can build
a new kernel for your varied boxes).
Bill
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org
lar
case - tftpd should be able to connect a UDP socket to a remote port 0 in
order to respond to this request.
(FreeBSD definitely can't send from port 0, but that's OK because we don't
want to.)
Bill
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing
kmaster.ca.
I can't traceroute to it as it stops resonding at 64.114.45.106, so
I'd say they are blocking things at that point - which isn't
helping at all :-( o
However the site comes up very fast.
Bill
> --
> Stephan Wehner
> >http://stephan.sugarmotor.or
FreeBSD machine and trace back to your client IP -
or as close as you can get. That may mean just to the edge of your
current provider but that may give you some idea.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.or
anently. It was the vibration in shipment that
temporarily fixed things - but shipping an item out wasn't what I
call a good fix :-)
> So I am thinking the problem may be with the co-location operation.
As above - it could be the colo - or it could be your network
connections to the colo.
> Hello Bill,
>
> * Bill Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > - Switching from and to promiscuous mode takes 7 seconds. All packets
> > > are dropped in the mean time.
> >
> > The SIOCSIFFLAGS handler in re_ioctl() currently just takes a short
> * Bill Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It's more likely a problem with the multicast filter programming.
> > > IPv6 is all about the multicasting (neighbord discovery depends on it
> > > to work correctly). I can't explain why it's not
of your system?
> > Make sure to add -e option to tcpdump(1).
>
> It's more likely a problem with the multicast filter programming.
> IPv6 is all about the multicasting (neighbord discovery depends on it
> to work correctly). I can't explain why it's not working th
ulticast filter programming.
IPv6 is all about the multicasting (neighbord discovery depends on it
to work correctly). I can't explain why it's not working though.
I've tested the sample 8168B/8111B cards that RealTek sent me, and I
didn't have any multicast problems w
>I think it would be a good idea if we de-orbit /usr/sbin/mrouted in
>7-CURRENT.
Do it. Maybe consider making a port if anyone cares to continue to
use it. (Gee, I suppose I could do that part ;-)
Bill
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailin
I don't know if using the 'mediopt' argument will shut down the
entire connection - but you probably are going to have to try.
If it works from the commnand line be sure to add it to the startup
script so it gets fixed on a reboot.
It
then go to a slow
green blink as it starts up, then go to a faster blink, and then
when it is steady you have a working DSL connection.
This really should probably go to freebsd-questions as from my POV
it's not a 'net' problem.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
__
ocess of machines, with a Sun Netra at the first entry
point, going to Mac G4's for the Web Objects for the the web apps,
connected to a mutli-CPU Solaris machine for the Oracale database.
The nice thing about their boxes, that some don't have is
three NICs so you can have a DMZ in the m
ed be somewhere in the link don't
discount the fact that the problem could be much closer. Have you
tried a traceroute to see if it is at one particular link.
If your provider does not block it you might try the -R option
to ping the site to help pinpoint the source of the
. Before we added a PRI and a Livingston we were
thinking about using the MT's in the 19" rack mount box they have.
And when performing fax from email - using sendmail incoming and
routing to fax [in the early days of the current 'net before many
people
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 07:23 , while impersonating an expert on
the internet, Nash Nipples sent this to stdout:
> Bill!! you are my superman! lol i dont even know how to thank you.
I've been running sendmail since it became more civilized in the
early 1990s after running smail fo
Some places won't accept my mail as even though
I"m on a STATIC IP and have been the same one for 3 years, they
consider all DSL lines as spam sources. So depending on end
destination I send some to my providers transport, and others off
to anothe
.3.4 (1.2.3.4) at (incomplete) on vlan1 permanent [vlan]
>
> In result of it's permanent entry, kernel doesn't listening for
> arp-replies for this host.
>
> My question is simple: is it bug or feature?
You left out 'user error'.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion -
;ifconfig steX ether xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx' without even using the
fast etherchannel driver?
If you have not tried this, then try it now:
# ifconfig ste2 ether 0:0:e8:1:2:3
# ifconfig ste2 1.1.1.4 netmask 0xff00 up
# ping 1.1.1
tem to use those name servers it's not
going to use them. I don't recall if the OP mentioned the OS
version he was using in the original post.
BIll
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
wn working nameservers in your /etc/resolv.conf
and then perform a 'chflags' to make that file read only, and then
nothing will change it until you reset the flags.
You problem Is not a BSD problem.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
f
back via
> fxp2
> and the only way I can do that is by using the 'fwd' command.
...
You didn't indicate the model of Cicso's but I've used both
NAT and PAT in Cisco routers.
I'm wondering if you did the NATing in the routers if this wouldn't
help?
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
plete
details on this - so it could be in the rumor category.
My gut feeling is that it is something Apple is doing not FreeBSD -
or we'd have heard a lot more about this.
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing lis
operly responding to auto-negotiation as documented. When
auto-neg fails at least one side will go to half-duplex, and with
the other in fdx then you usually only see throughput of
about 10% of normal because of data being sent back on a line that
the fdx line thinks is clear to send upon.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ional
is not. I don't know if that helps your race or not.
Bill
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ed
and lookup from the table, add a least conns selection method, add a
round robin method, add the ability to point to a table of machines
(possibly allow marking a machine as 'no new connections') for picking
nexthops. that would bring us up to the basic hardware vendor
implementations
d see what
people thought. 4-5 years is probably enough time to wait =)
My proposal: keep IFF_NOARP, but add IFF_NOSENDARP and IFF_NOREPLYARP
(or something, I'm no good at making up names). I agree with Louie
that it makes sense for these to be per-interface as opposed to
Ruslan's sy
k it's great that a freebsd netflow implementation exists, it's
just a shame that you have to configure netkitchensink to use it..
--
- bill fumerola / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.fre
use.
Thats the complete 10.x.x.x, 17.16.x.x to 17.31.255.255 and
192.168.x.x.
Using addresses outside the private address space can mislead you
when routers take the date elsewhere.
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mail
grabs all frames they even get anywhere near the IP layer. If you're
not actually using the bge0 interface to exchange any traffic, just
do ifconifg bge0 up and don't bother putting an IP address on it.
You'll still be able to put the interface into promiscuous mode and
monitor
whose data may be combined/joined/scaled
with information from the snmp agent's IF-MIB/ifXTable tables.
--
- bill fumerola / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> Gang,
>
> I've been wading through several network drivers recently,
> learning Bill Paul's code. Specifically, I examined the
> following drivers: ste(4), rl(4), dc(4), nge(4), and vr(4).
>
> They all use the consumer/producer approach for handling TX.
>
s is a level 3 switch
and it can be turned into router only or router/switch.
$400. Not being a name-brand that small business equate like they
do Cisco the used prices are just a fraction of the comparable
Cisco product.
I see similar one for $495 =buy-now= and th
rthcoming in the next week to build packages that have no direct
dependencies beyond glib for tethereal and gtk for ethereal.
--
- bill fumerola / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
on on this subject is quite scarce, I thought I'd post this
question and see what type of response I get back.
Any assistance or suggestions would be greatly appreciated,
Thanks in advance,
-=-Bill-=-
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://li
is is the
most likely reason. msn/microsoft blocks icmp wholesale from their site
and yahoo^Wfreebsd.org has no such filter. this would break pmtud.
none of this belonged on -net, though...
--
- bill fumerola / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; doesn't work.
> What do you recommend as configuration settings?
> I seem to get stuck.
Is the order in you /etc/host.conf file set to
hosts
bind
Are the names in you /etc/hosts file correct.
IP first then FQDN followed by short name.
You didn't
a very large flash file on their front page. I've also heard
annecdotal reports of slow G4 to MS machines too.
But not everyone has this and I can't seem to find an answer.
And I have NO problems with pings. Just data transfer.
One G4 runs high load as shown under very little CPU avail
r.corp
PING choker.corp.yahoo.com (216.145.52.228): 56 data bytes
..
--- choker.corp.yahoo.com ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0% packet loss
--
- bill fumerola / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been too busy over the last couple of weeks. I have no problem
with the multicast filtering API change actually happening, and if
someone who actually has time wants to commit it that'd be fine with me.
Bill
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
d is true.
> Anyone have any clues on this bizarre problem?
No.
But I'm going to see if I can trace down what I have heard, that
may only be rumors.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
bsd
0
Press any key to continue...
perhaps you were looking for a cisco, windows, or ipsec forum. in the
mean time, i've moved this thread to the general discussion list.
--
- bill fumerola / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. patent
gs noschg /etc/resolv.conf.
See man chflags for further information.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
you need to do to enable/power up the
on-board NIC that we're not doing
This is something you should be asking the PCI gurus about,
not the networking gurus.
-Bill
--
=
-Bill Paul(510) 749-2329 | Senio
r TrustedUser.
In /etc/rc.conf try this.
sendmail_submit_enable="YES"for local use or
sendmail_submit_outbound="YES"
For best results tryman 8 rc.sendmail.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing l
I think c) (perhaps combined with IP_RECVDSTADDR so that you know
whether you got a unicast or broadcast) is the correct answer.
I think binding UDP sockets to tell what interface/address was
the destination is a historical artifact.
Bill
___
[EMAIL
LEN, 0x18000);
It should appear twice in the bge_blockinit() function.
- Change 0x18000 to 0x1 in both places.
- Recompile your kernel and/or if_bge.ko module.
The fix I made to 4-STABLE and 5-CURRENT does basically the same
thing, but only applies the different valu
> Copied to -net rather than the cvs lists...
>
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Bill Paul wrote:
>
> > Tested with the Xterasys XN-152 NIC (hard to beat $29 for a gigE
> > NIC).
>
> That's definately not a bad price. Do the remarks about the earlier
> rl cards sti
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Bill Paul wrote:
>
> > Pros:
> >
> > - The 8169 is very easy to program. RealTek has been very peculiar
> > in how it's releasing documentation for it though. They had the
> > manual on their site for a while, then t
duplex as well.
If your switch is not managed and doesn't allow you to manually
configure the port settings, then you're out of luck. You'll just
have to live with half duplex mode.
-Bill
--
==
I've been told they will not prevent me from releasing driver source.
I hope to get this resolved soon. Stay tuned.
-Bill
--
=====
-Bill Paul(510) 749-2329 | Senior Engineer, Master of Uni
MAIL PROTECTED] And don't be
afraid to spread the word. Ask other people on other mailing lists.
Ask your friends. Ask your enemies. Ask not what your OS can do for
you: ask what you can do for your OS.
-Bill
--
=
-B
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
by
each device.
What I did see was a lot of people holding forth about duplex mismatches
which, while they can be annoying, are not the only source of RX errors.
A duplex mismatch typically yeilds very low overall throughput and very
bursty traffic patterns.
-Bill
--
=
/sys/dev/mii
- Rebuild your kernel and/or if_bge.ko and miibus.ko modules
-Bill
--
=====
-Bill Paul(510) 749-2329 | Senior Engineer, Master of Unix-Fu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Wind River Sy
and miidevs into /sys/dev/mii
- Recompile your kernel and/or if_bge.ko and miibus.ko modules.
-Bill
--
=
-Bill Paul(510) 749-2329 | Senior Engineer, Master of Unix-Fu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Wind
totally unrelated drivers
- Requests for help transfering large sums of money out of Nigeria
- Information about septic tank clealing
- Pictures of people getting it on with barnyard animals
- Bikeshed arguments
Thanks in advance for an
The short answer is no, you can't, in_pcb turns 255.255.255.255 into
the "primary" interface's broadcast address.
I doubt this is actually useful behavior, but that's not what you
asked =)
Bill
___
[EMAIL PRO
#x27;s signature mark. ;) If you know you'll always use
> 100BT/FD, it wouldn't hurt to have your ISP set the port to
> that as well (just to be safe).
A good reference to all the negotiation problems with Cisco
can be found at:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/46.html
>
to get them to fix it.
The last official update at IANA shows June 18 of this year, and
it is still spelled bakcup.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ne
ny ideas?
mrouted should work fine in this situation, IF it's run after the ppp
session is established (it doesn't know how to handle dynamic interfaces).
If it doesn't, try kill -USR1 `cat /var/run/mrouted.pid` and send me the
/var/tmp/mrouted.dump file that it creates and I'll tr
and take new zones in charge even if this serial is "not good" ?
The other poster pointed out that your error is in lines 12, 13,
and 15 of zone/lamddomain.com
I've always used 'nslint' - in the ports tree - to check everything
after I make any changes.
1 - 100 of 210 matches
Mail list logo