That's great, I just ordered one from Amazon and will go figure it out with
you!
-adrian
On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 at 08:54, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are some images for now, I'll have to plug it back in to get the rest
> of the data.
>
> https://ibb.co/3N1S
;ll go find my AR9462 NICs and take a look.
Also, can you take a photo of the NIC itself, so I can make sure it lines
up with what I have in my box of Atheros parts?
Thanks!
-adrian
On Sun, 1 Dec 2024 at 05:41, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After all the info i gathered about ath
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 at 23:24, Özkan KIRIK wrote:
>
> Hello Adrian,
>
> I wonder if the current RSS code supports software mode. Is it possible to
> enforce software RSS? And what about Sender Side Scaling ?
The current RSS code does enforce it on all the NICs, so if you enable
i
re they
shipped that was actually really broken :(
-adrian
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:26 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>
> > On 3/7/21 10:03 PM, Özkan KIRIK wrote:
> > > Any suggestions to enable RSS ?
> >
> > I found that RSS hardware computed checksu
;
> Could someone please review and/or commit these patches?
>
I'm happy to commit these if noone complains too much to me about it.
I approved one of them. I'll go approve the other now.
-adrian
>
> Best,
>
> Neel Chauhan
>
> ===
>
> https://www.neelc
OH wow, I only JUST saw this, sorry!
On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 03:40, D'Arcy Cain wrote:
> On 2020-06-19 12:14, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > [snip] Also, did you plug in something USB-3 related recently? :-)
> >
> > USB-3 / USB-C's signaling frequency interferes with 2.4
transmit routine. The meat of the change is going to be in iflib and
> all non-iflib drivers' if_transmit.
>
This isn't a terrible idea - we do the same on wifi for EAPOL / 802.1x
frames, and some drivers even do the same thing for DHCP frames. Doing it
in iflib wo
[snip] Also, did you plug in something USB-3 related recently? :-)
USB-3 / USB-C's signaling frequency interferes with 2.4GHz :-)
-adrian
>
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To uns
at you could try is forcing a full reset every time the NIC needs to
reset.
sysctl dev.ath.0.hal.force_full_reset=1
See if that helps.
I can go whack an AR9287 into a laptop and set it up as a 2G hotspot.
What I suggest you do is recompile your kernel/modules with the following
options:
adrian added a comment.
i remember there was some concern in the past where there were very bad rss
key choices out there. is there a reason for actually pushing for a random rss
key?
I stuck with the microsoft rss key (and a symmetric rss key at norse)
specifically so there wouldn&#
n dump somewhere I can read? I'd
like to go add this to a couple out of tree wifi drivers under
development so this would make that whole thing much easier.
Thanks!
-adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
adrian added a comment.
Yeah, we should have a fallback rate function in net80211.
Why? Just to make sure that you're using the previously /negotiated/ rate,
all the way back down to the lowest basic rate. Eg, you may not actually be
allowed to use CCK 1Mbit rate according to t
There was always a race between bus bandwidth, memory bandwidth and
bus/memory latencies. I'm not currently on the disk/packet pushing side of
things, but the last couple times I were it was at different points in that
4d space and almost every single time there was a benefi
hi,
We figured it out today - gcc + no-arch-specific builtin bug. :-)
cognet and I are sorting through that stuff at the moment and should
land a fix in -HEAD soon.
Thanks!
-adrian
On 28 March 2018 at 02:20, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 23.03.2018 20:07, Adrian Chadd wrote:
&g
hen I next power up the AP in question
-adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
d
platform stuff and this just threw a spanner in my plans. I'd really
appreciate some help here cause I don't have time to wade through more
platform breakage just to do wifi stack / driver work. I have limited
spare time as it is these days :(
Thanks,
-adrian
_
Hi,
I keep telling people that right now it's not something I at least
have time to fix up. :)
-a
On 22 March 2018 at 08:37, Zeus Panchenko wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>>
>> It will work, if you will change ethernet's MAC address to
I dunno yet; this is a very embedded mips74k box. :)
-a
On 22 March 2018 at 06:00, Olivier Houchard wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 03:52:39PM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>> On 22.03.2018 10:31, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> > Erk. I'll go see if I can fig
oh and xcompiled with gcc-6.x .
-a
On 22 March 2018 at 09:09, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I dunno yet; this is a very embedded mips74k box. :)
>
>
> -a
>
> On 22 March 2018 at 06:00, Olivier Houchard wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 03:52:39PM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wro
Erk. I'll go see if I can figure out what's going on.
Thanks! This is really quite grr-y.
-a
On 21 March 2018 at 23:35, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 22.03.2018 09:23, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Trap cause = 2 (TLB miss (load or instr. fetch) - kernel mode)
>> [
c1d08f44 sp c1247c40 sz 144
dyn_tick+0x238 (0,?,?,?) ra 80214dfc sp c1247cd0 sz 120
itimer_fire+0x1440 (?,?,?,?) ra 802150c0 sp c1247d48 sz 88
softclock+0x9c (?,?,?,?) ra 0 sp c1247da0 sz 0
db>
Has anyone seen this?
FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r331092M: Sun Mar 18 23:33:51 PDT 2018
adrian@test-2:/u
to add 60GHz channel support. I don't know what
else is required for 11ad as I haven't really looked in a few years.
-adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe,
What's the actual stack trace? :)
-adrian
On 9 December 2017 at 10:55, Yuri wrote:
> This started happening after I updated revision from Aug 1, 2017 to Dec 6,
> 2017.
>
> The crash stack begins at syscall_fast.
>
>
> Yuri
>
>
> __
just guessing).
>
> So, any objections on commiting this addition to m_move_pkthdr?
>
> + to->m_nextpkt = from->m_nextpkt;
> + from->m_nextpkt = NULL;
None from me. (I haven't checked to see if you've done it yet or not.)
-adrian
> --
> Gleb Smirnoff
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Gleb, what do you think?
-a
On 12 October 2017 at 13:42, Karim Fodil-Lemelin
wrote:
> On 2017-07-07 10:46 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>>
>> On 05.07.2017 19:23, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>>>
>>>> As many of you know, when dealing with IP fragments the kernel
hi!
please do fix it. I'm way busy with life right now. :)
-a
On 11 September 2017 at 10:18, Eric Joyner wrote:
> I think that sounds right; but Adrian is the one who put the code in the
> #ifdef RSS blocks in. We don't have it enabled/defined in our testing here.
>
>
>> explain that, if so!)
>
> I checked latest RSS updates from Microsoft. There is no such type.
> But they did add UDP_IP4, UDP_IPV6 and UDP_IPV6_EX. I am going to
> whack UDP_IPV4_EX and update various comment. I will setup a review
> soon.
>
> Thanks,
> sephe
>
Hi,
I seem to recall it was something some chipsets supported? I forget the
details.
-adrian
On 30 August 2017 at 00:07, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> IPv4 UDP with extended headers o_O? Or it was just a mistake.
>
> Thanks,
> sephe
>
> --
> To
to->m_pkthdr = from->m_pkthdr; /* especially tags */
> SLIST_INIT(&from->m_pkthdr.tags); /* purge tags from src */
> from->m_flags &= ~M_PKTHDR;
> + from->m_nextpkt = NULL;
> }
>
> It will reset the m_nextpkt so we don't ha
Actually - into individual reviews.freebsd.org reviews?
-adrian
On 26 April 2017 at 14:53, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> hiya,
>
> can you throw these in bugs?
>
>
> -a
>
>
> On 17 April 2017 at 06:58, Chris Torek wrote:
>> The first is mostly cosmetic, it'
hiya,
can you throw these in bugs?
-a
On 17 April 2017 at 06:58, Chris Torek wrote:
> The first is mostly cosmetic, it's just something I observed when
> I turned on multicast debug to find the bug that the second patch
> is for.
>
> The second patch is a kludge and if anyone has a better fix
It'll be supported as much as someone is willing to pay for it.
It isn't out of the realm of possibility to implement an if_transmit
style layer for altq, etc so it could be a generic queue discipline.
It'd be nice to have a multi-queue version of this but we're not there
yet.
Hiya,
Ok, maybe the channel lists are different. 116/140 are in the DFS range..
-adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-uns
Yeah I know :( I'm still trying to find spare cycles to keep moving
the driver forward to the latest dfbsd code.
At least we know which commit broke it..
-a
On 20 February 2017 at 15:57, Kevin Bowling wrote:
> It used to work pretty well, but HEAD regressed heavily. My card crashes
> 8260 no
scanning isn't always going to return the same results.
> -How come my t510 thinkpad (different os btw) can see my 5GHz net on my new
> ap but my yoga does not?
Try "ifconfig -v wlan0 list channel" and let's see what's going on.
Which channel is the 5GHz net on with
inux ethtool is in freebsd's ifconfig, albeit not
in a reusable/runtime-extensible fashion. It'd be nice to include say,
many more vendor counters in a somewhat generic fashion, versus how we
currently do things.
I think it'd be a good
adrian accepted this revision.
adrian added a reviewer: adrian.
This revision has a positive review.
REPOSITORY
rS FreeBSD src repository
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9270
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: ale, #manpages
i can reproduce this daily using flowtable on a wifi enabled PC on -HEAD.
-adrian
On 12 January 2017 at 06:13, Jakub Palider wrote:
> An update: eventually, FLOWTABLE option also resulted in crash with
> __rw_lock_hard on FreeBSD release/11.0.0 (also on VM).
> This time, how
yeah, adrian is currently busy doing non-paid wifi work, so getting
onto non-paid RSS configuration work is taking a backburner.
Patches gratefully accepted though!
-a
On 3 January 2017 at 17:19, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 11:34 PM, David Belle-Isle
> wrote:
t or m_freem that can't be invoked from
>>> > a filter either).
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Vincenzo
>>> >>
>>> >> 2016-12-28 19:06 GMT+01:00 John Baldwin :
&
a lot of recent refactoring.
>> So, if there is an easy way to extract just the locking change that would
>> be preferable as an interim solution.
>>
>> cheers
>> luigi
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Vincenzo
>>>
>>>
>>
hi,
What's the commit? We should get it into -HEAD asap.
-adrian
On 20 December 2016 at 01:25, Vincenzo Maffione wrote:
> Ok, applied to the netmap github repo.
> This fix will be published when Luigi does the next commit on FreeBSD.
>
> Cheers,
> Vincenzo
>
>
Hiya!
I'm using ipfw on mips, and I've found it recently broke. Any ipfw
command (eg ipfw -a l) says
ipfw: ipfw_ctl3 invalid option 0v0
ipfw: setsockopt(IP_FW_xxx): Invalid argument
Who broke it? :)
-adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org ma
What do you mean with "urtwn0 exists from usb bus" ?
-adrian
On 18 September 2016 at 14:28, Ze Claudio Pastore wrote:
> I took longer than expected, got new dongles just to make sure.
>
> What I have tested an conclusions:
>
> - 11.0-RC2: same problem persists,
land?
>>
>>
>>
>> 2016-09-13 0:15 GMT-03:00 Adrian Chadd :
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> have you tried say, 10.3 kernel with 10.2 userland? does it still work?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -adrian
>>
>>
>
__
Hi!
have you tried say, 10.3 kernel with 10.2 userland? does it still work?
-adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
w wlan0 'UP'?
>>
>> I'm asking this because I'm seeing something strange locally on one
>> machine.
>>
>> Glen
>
>
> I have stopped and started the network repeatedly using both my home router
> and my hot-spot and I can't get it to fail
hi
Would /someone/ pretty please fix this "run wpa_supplicant multiple
times at interface start" problem?
I'm sure it's screwing things up in a bad way, and trying to grovel
around and fix the way we do rc scripts is not my favourite thing in
the world.
Thanks,
-adrian
;s failing to send out the 802.1x frame
exchange.
It may be something as simple as "adrian needs to fix the rate control again".
-adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubs
On 21 August 2016 at 07:42, Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
> On 20 Aug 2016, at 21:27, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> I wonder if the right-er thing to do here is to allow the cpuid to be
>> whatever it needs to be, but limit the cpuid lookups when it resolves
>> to a netisr arra
On 20 August 2016 at 19:02, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Aug 20, 2016 6:29 PM, "Adrian Chadd" wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There have been some changes to the scan code and iwn scan timeout code.
>> Andriy may have some ideas.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
Hi,
There have been some changes to the scan code and iwn scan timeout code.
Andriy may have some ideas.
Thanks!
A
On Aug 19, 2016 3:48 PM, "Kevin Oberman" wrote:
> Lately I have had serious issues with my system successfully associating.
> These were not present with 10.3.
>
> > uname -a
> F
se netisr_get_cpuid() in netisr_select_cpuid() to limit cpuid value
> returned by protocol to be sure that it is not greather than nws_count.
>
> PR: 211836
> Reviewed by: adrian
> MFC after:3 days
>
> Modified:
> head/sys/net/if_epair.c
> head/sys
On 17 August 2016 at 08:43, Ben RUBSON wrote:
>
>> On 17 Aug 2016, at 17:38, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> ok, so this is what I was seeing when I was working on this stuff last.
>>
>> The big abusers are:
>>
>> * so_snd lock, fo
ICs in NUMA domain 1...)
-adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 16 August 2016 at 02:58, Ben RUBSON wrote:
>
>> On 16 Aug 2016, at 03:45, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> ok, can you try 5) but also running with the interrupt threads pinned to CPU
>> 1?
>
> What do you mean by interrupt threads ?
>
&
likely decreases some latency -> increasing throughput
slightly.
Thanks,
-adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
i don't know what's different between stable/11 and -head. I'd
appreciate some help in figuring /that/ out...
-a
On 12 August 2016 at 15:53, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 03:44:43PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Heh, ok. So undo the #if 0 and let
Heh, ok. So undo the #if 0 and let's just see if it crashes or not.
-adrian
On 12 August 2016 at 15:13, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 02:37:44PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Just #if 0 that whole chunk out and see if that
Hi
Just #if 0 that whole chunk out and see if that improves wireless at work?
-a
On 12 August 2016 at 14:18, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:40:03AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> EIther stable/11 or head. Both are fine.
>>
>>
>>
>> -a
&g
EIther stable/11 or head. Both are fine.
-a
On 12 August 2016 at 11:05, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:01:25AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> David,
>>
>> Totally untested; will need manual application as I bet this patch is
>> mangled.
>&g
David,
Totally untested; will need manual application as I bet this patch is mangled.
Would you mind testing this? I have a feeling we need to add if_addr
lock calls in a few places.
Thanks,
-adrian
Index: sys/net80211/ieee80211_ioctl.c
Yeah, I integrated them from you like 10 years ago. It's in there somewhere. :-)
(IP_BINDANY?)
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mailing.freebsd.ipfw/L8lzLmG05WE
.. poke me to write up some documentation. :)
-adrian
On 12 August 2016 at 08:29, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 12/0
d we do for locking?
-adrian
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Which ones of these hit the line rate comfortably?
-a
On 11 August 2016 at 15:35, Ben RUBSON wrote:
>
>> On 11 Aug 2016, at 18:36, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> mlx4_core0: mem
>> 0xfbe0-0xfbef,0xfb00-0xfb7f irq 64 at device 0.0
adrian did mean fixed-domain-rr. :-P sorry!
(Sorry, needed to update my NUMA boxes, things "changed" since I wrote this.)
-a
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, sen
see the before and after effects
on local versus remote memory access.
Thanks!
-adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-uns
On 10 August 2016 at 12:50, Ben RUBSON wrote:
>
>> On 10 Aug 2016, at 21:47, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> yeah, I'd like you to do some further testing with NUMA. Are you able
>> to run freebsd-11 or -HEAD on these boxes?
>
> Hi Adrian,
hi,
yeah, I'd like you to do some further testing with NUMA. Are you able
to run freebsd-11 or -HEAD on these boxes?
-adrian
On 8 August 2016 at 07:01, Ben RUBSON wrote:
>
>> On 04 Aug 2016, at 11:40, Ben RUBSON wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 02 Aug 2016, at 22:11
On 7 August 2016 at 18:40, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> I've updated the wiki with this TODO list. How's it look?
>>
>> https://wiki.freebsd.org/NetworkRSS
>
> Pretty much what h
[snip]
I've updated the wiki with this TODO list. How's it look?
https://wiki.freebsd.org/NetworkRSS
-adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &q
On 21 July 2016 at 18:54, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> Cool! Yeah, the RSS bits thing can be removed, as it's just doing a
>> bitmask instead of a % operator to do mapping. I think we can just go
>
librss, I don't think I committed it to -HEAD. I'll go dig
it out and throw it into freebsd-head soon.
-adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail
27;t care
about the rest of the stack being RSS aware; they just want to be able
to control the NIC configurations from userspace and then get it
completely out of the way.
I'd appreciate any other feedback/comments/suggestions. If you're
using RSS and you haven't told me then please l
a given
callout wheel and then migrating things around is just "change cpu
mask", not "change callout cpu id.")
-adrian
On 20 June 2016 at 04:00, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 06/20/16 12:30, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>>
>> What does prevent us from converting TC
Hi,
Kevin hasn't finished / integrated the support yet, sorry :(
-adrian
On 18 May 2016 at 17:49, Mateusz Piotrowski <0...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to this thread
> (https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2015-December/012935.html
>
Some extern "C" { } around some includes? :)
-a
On 8 May 2016 at 14:46, Victor Toni wrote:
> Trying to port mcproxy to FreeBSD I encountered a quite strange problem.
> Compiling everything works but linking fails with the following error:
>
> $ c++ -v -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib -pthread -o mcpr
It doesn't overwrite unread slots; it just hits the end and stops
RX'ing (and is counted by the NIC as an RX overflow) until you've
RX'ed some frames and told netmap what you've handed.
-adrian
___
freebsd-net@freeb
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5318
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5317
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5316
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5276
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5275
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5290
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5272
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com
adrian accepted this revision.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5274
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
howard0su_gmail.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, adrian, network
Cc
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5273
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com
adrian accepted this revision.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5185
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, np, transport, hselasky
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5283
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5282
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com
adrian accepted this revision.
adrian added a comment.
Nice! Thanks for all this work!
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5185
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com
adrian added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
sys/dev/hyperv/netvsc/hv_netvsc_drv_freebsd.c:455 this should be a separate
commit
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5185
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5167
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5159
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5158
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com
adrian accepted this revision.
adrian added a comment.
So this is okay, but we put the non-unit bits under 'hw', not 'dev'. Ie, it'd
be dev.XXX.0.stuff, and hw.XXX.stuff.
So I'll okay this, but we should eventually shuffle them back to 'hw'.
REVIS
adrian accepted this revision.
adrian added a comment.
Good!
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5098
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
howard0su_gmail.com
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5166
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com
hi,
can you share your testing program source?
-a
On 3 February 2016 at 05:37, Meyer, Wolfgang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we are evaluating network performance on a DELL-Server (PowerEdge R930 with 4
> Sockets, hw.model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8891 v3 @ 2.80GHz) with 10
> GbE-Cards. We use progra
adrian accepted this revision.
adrian added a comment.
This revision has a positive review.
Fine by me!
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5175
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger
1 - 100 of 838 matches
Mail list logo