The output header is instructive:
USER COMMANDPID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS
www httpd 18423 3 tcp4 6 *:80 *:*
www httpd 18423 4 tcp4 *:* *:*
www httpd 25184 3 tcp4 6 *:80 *:*
www
On Feb 20, 2008, at 1:54 PM, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Wes Peters wrote:
I see a number of people have replied to this message offering
solutions of how to accomplish your migration, using a variety of
tools available to you in FreeBSD. I've always found this
community very supporti
uot; is not
the solution.
I'll get down off my soapbox now. This is such an FAQ on this list,
you should be required to read and answer this question before being
allowed to post to the list. :^)
--
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Wes Peters
On 7/16/07, Sten Daniel Soersdal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess it wouldn't hurt for the operating system to accept larger
frames, as long as only the correctly sized frames are transmitted.
There are alot of people, including myself, that assume a host can't
receive a frame that is larger
ot having any luck.
>
> Any ideas or suggestions would be welcome.
The freebsd-questions mailing list is the appropriate place to ask questions
like this. This mailing list is for developers working on the FreeBSD
networking implementation itself.
--
Where am I, and what am
fig directly and see whether this helps.
And then try downloading something from a real server instead of running the
stupid benchmark. Really! Burn up some bits getting something real, not
running somebody's artifical browser toy.
--
Where am I, and what am I
ly
mis-configured something. Did you have to install any special drivers on
XP? I'm wondering if they're using some sort of link compression to get
the promised speed. Also, try downloading something from one of the
well-connected FreeBSD mirrors and see what kind of download
ter
then routes between these virtual interfaces in the normal manner.
I can't speak to the insides of the HP equipment, but Xylan/Alcatel used a
modified version of the Net/2 TCP/IP stack running on VxWorks in the
management processor.
--
Where am I, and what am I doing in
ess of the other NIC in his XP box doesn't lend me to believe he has
that knowlege.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] m
s of the packet if no MAC header matches
were found. This feature was used to implement hardware routing (the HRE-X
module), allowing us to route packets between IP networks at a million
packets per second.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters
Alcatel
architecture is fairly good, but it carries a lot of baggage from the Xylan
"any to any" switching architecture which tends to drive their cost up a
bit. The HP ProCurves perform well and are reliable and (relatively)
cheap.
--
"Where am I,
mething like that.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-n
u expect to have a design
for the ARP stuff and TCP buffer sizing, since they are underway?
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
tennas is very
expensive.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://softweyr.com/
On Thursday 18 December 2003 09:07, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Wes Peters wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 December 2003 03:35 pm, Charles Swiger wrote:
> > > On Dec 16, 2003, at 5:58 PM, Alex (ander Sendzimir) wrote:
> > > > I have a small home networ
#x27;t see anything.
These were typically sold as "Dual Speed" hubs, thus the "DS" in the
product id.
--
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
I bridge on the card, and the first interface.
Have you tried this card on it's own, to be certain the card is OK?
If so, I wonder if the machine is out of some critical resource (irqs?)
required to configure the card.
--
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handba
t where we all agree (at least that
it sucks less than the alternatives) the design is probably not too far off
in the ozone.
Now we just have to let Bruce implement it. Where *did* I put that
intercontinental bullwhip ;^)
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handb
On Thursday 23 October 2003 11:23 am, Charles Swiger wrote:
> On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 11:52 AM, Barney Wolff wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 01:55:55AM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > What are you going to do when IPv6 comes into more general
On Thursday 23 October 2003 08:52 am, Barney Wolff wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 01:55:55AM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> > To me it's not a matter of "boot code" vs. general usefulness so much
> > as it's just obviously the right way to do it. We use all-ones
etwork?
I'm pretty certain the code won't be all that difficult if we just fully
understand the problem before we jump in, but I'm also pretty certain we
don't fully understand the problem, let alone the solution. ;^)
--
Where am I, and what am I doing in this
h more than the
sum of the sort-of but not really working hacks we have flying about
now.
Go Bruce! Go Bruce! ;^)
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
ke your solution
better. I'm happy to know that will be in 5.2 and I have PR or two
to assign over to you so you can close them. ;^)
--
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Wes Peters
em
> behave identically.
> Only one can be default gateway.
In point of fact, it's just completely wrong. I guess it depends on
what you mean by "cannot handle", it certainly doesn't crash the kernel
or halt networking or anything like that. In fact, the first interfac
t mailing list. Please take these to
freebsd-chat or I'll have to ban you from this list.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ase do so on -chat, which was made for
drivel.
2) net/2 and net/3 were code distributions from UC Berkeley. Your
favorite UNIX history site will provide you with any details you want.
Some of them might even be accurate.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?&q
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 04:49 pm, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Wes Peters wrote:
> [ ... ]
>
> > The idea is, we have listener on each ethernet interface listening
> > via a bpf. The listener listens for an 'appliance discovery'
> > packet which is broadcast by t
Synopsis: Bug in network stack in sending broadcast packets
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->wes
Responsible-Changed-By: wes
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jul 16 11:26:15 PDT 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'm working on all-call broadcasting code already, I'll fix this.
http://www.freeb
p address of the interface, even
if this is 0.0.0.0. This special case will not call rtalloc or do any
other route lookups.
Stop me if I'm violating specifications or even just common sense
here... (I need to read the IP and UDP RFCs in a bit more detail, they
seem pretty vague in this
thout Richard to explain it to us.
--
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Friday 11 July 2003 14:09, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 11 Jul, Wes Peters wrote:
> > What we observed on our embedded system is the packet gets sent on
> > all attached interfaces, with dest IP 255.255.255.255, and a src IP
> > of the local address that has the default rou
to CURRENT and
MFC on a normal timeline; we'll want this fixed here before 5.2.
Sorry to take so long to reply to this. ;^)
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
boot phase. Since you're booting from
the network, there is no way to eliminate your exposure, but you can make
certain you don't start the usual culprits (mail, dns, web, etc services)
until after you've processed the firewall rules.
--
Where am I
owner of port 308, that is. Perhaps it would be best to
contact the novastor maintainer and get him to fix it? The current
registered maintainer is Brian Dickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
--
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Wes Peters
he US would provide
> IPv6 support... :-)
Xmission does. www.xmission.com. Probably not useful to you unless
you're located in Utah, and I have no idea what it means outside their
own network.
--
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Wes Peters
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
sors running on high
end machines.
--
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
d. ;^) Another freebsd-net success story.
--
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
be cause for concern;
at 0.03% I can only conclude that you have a switched ethernet
and have occasional broadcast traffic. 0.03% is way too low for
any half-duplex (i.e. built with hubs) network.
Repeat after me: "Collisions are normal on ethernet. 0.03% is
nothing to be upset about."
On Wednesday 28 May 2003 08:00 am, Barney Wolff wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 07:45:10AM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> > > Don't assume that you can't create an alias for each user. When I
> > > worked at a very large NY bank, with well over 100,000 employees,
>
o
> internet. And also I want to keep part of the e-mail accounts on the
> main server for the whatever.com domain itself.
Why qmail?
--
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
When I
> worked at a very large NY bank, with well over 100,000 employees,
> /etc/mail/aliases was that big, and sendmail worked just fine.
In sendmail, you can do domain routing with mailertable. I think you can
do the same in Postfix with rel
7;lesser os's :)
Sounds like something we need. I've got a prism1 and prism2 card I
could donate, but that won't solve the larger problem; I'd rather have
support for the new chipset instead. Warner, let me know if I can help
by sending a
see what changed. Watch for system header file
changes, those can be pretty far-reaching. If the kernel doesn't change,
you're pretty safe with buildworld, installworld, and selectively
restarting any long-lived daemons that changed.
--
Where am I,
. Any objections for fixing
> this?
That would be convenient.
--
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.f
e* effort to crack. ;^)
/me wanders off whistling the 'end to end encryption' theme song...
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
es NetBSD.
Perhaps so. This is one of the strengths offered by the BSD community:
choice (aka differentiation).
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
kernelconfig.html
Right there on your FreeBSD system. This handbook section also appears
to be available in German, French, Italian, and Japanese. all right
there in /usr/share/doc. Enjoy.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters
On Saturday 08 February 2003 17:22, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Wes Peters wrote:
> > On Friday 07 February 2003 01:25, David Gilbert wrote:
> > > I believe that someone here recomended Tigon III based cards ... but I
> > > was recently looking through 5.0-RELEASE
ny mention of Tigon III.
The follow-on to the Tigon II is the Broadcom BCM570x supported by
the bge(4) driver in FreeBSD. This is not what you want. They're
certainly cheap to test with, though; the Netgear GA302T sells for
under $40 at a few online retailers.
--
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 08:42, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On Monday 03 February 2003 08:19 pm, Wes Peters wrote:
> = On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 05:27, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> = > Hi!
> = >
> = > This question bothered me for a while -- most of the traffic on my
> = > LAN is
office supply stores was
giving them away last December and I picked up several...
--
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
86
IIRC it's been in for more than a year.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe:
ll wait
> a week before applying them.
Wanna post a patch for the stalwarts to test?
If we had RELENG_4 in P4 you could just branch. Sigh.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters
hould take care of the problem, but I
haven't backed that up with any testing. SIOCSIFADDR on an interface
does remove all routes for the interface and then rebuild routes for
all now-existing addresses, so any cached routes on that interface will
now be invalid.
8 or 9k.
>
> I thought it was an IPv6 packet with payload >= 2^16 bytes.
> rfc2675
"Jumbo Frames" are (gigabit) ethernet data frames holding up to
9 Kbytes. I am certain "jumbogram" is referring to the same thing.
-- Wes Peters
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
e DNS book when you
run out of help in the other one.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
er would? Any
> > assistance is appreciated.
>
> I believe this message belongs in -net.
No, actually it belongs in -questions, where ALL "how do I do XXX with
FreeBSD?" questions belong.
What bstephens needs to do is add
gateway_enable=YES
ame
board for 5.0 development work.
I'll be happy to trade for my BP6 with 2x Celeron 500 if you're unhappy.
;^)
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters
Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
in LLC (or SNAP) frames? How odd.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe: se
for use in a core router, or acceptable for
any of the wildly esoteric CRAP espoused in the past 10 or 12 messages
in this thread. If you don't like fastforwarding, don't use it, but
don't get in the way of people who use it and maintain it.
Sheesh.
--
an omni antenna on a large cement
silo about 3.5 miles/5 km away without an amplifier. Typical throughput
is about 1 mpbs.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PRO
able
Memory to map the destination address to a cached route or interface
pointer; it would be interesting to experiment with something like
that in FreeBSD.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> BTW, Wes, I'm still waiting for a working example of an indirect route
> with also indirect gateway.
Any indirect route via the opposite end of a point-to-point connection.
Right?
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handb
e FDDI layer, or the ATM layer, etc.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe: s
an ingress filter or an egress filter. I'm not
that familiar with ipfw, but I guess I should be.
Is there a command on FreeBSD to dump the contents of the fastforwarding
route cache? If not, this would be a good "junior kernel hacker" task
as well.
--
"Where am I
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> Wes Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The description there isn't very forthcoming. fastforwarding caches
> > the results of a route lookup for destination addresses that are not
> > on the local machine, and uses th
ation addresses that are not
on the local machine, and uses the cached route to short-circuit the
normal (relatively slow) route lookup process. The packet flows
directly from one layer2 input routine directly to the opposing
layer2 output routine without traversing the IP layer.
--
te.html
;^)
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT
man page for
bpf. Otherwise, you'll have to explain what you mean by "TCP intercept", it
is not a terminology in common use.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softwey
.freebsd.org/~kris/ipid.patch
>
> Comments?
Looks clean. The only comment I can find is: Why not have ip_randomid()
return the ID in network byte order? It would save several HTONS macros
trailing the ip_randomid() calls.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbaske
proper configuration in /etc/host.conf and /etc/resolv.conf.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://so
Brett Glass wrote:
>
> At 07:27 AM 4/1/2001, Wes Peters wrote:
>
> >Why use PPPoE -- you really prefer to toss away gobs of bandwidth?
>
> I don't see why it should be that inefficient.
Because PPP encapsulation adds a lot of non-information.
> In fact, I
ets across the tunnel, in which case
it's no worse than anything else.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] h
and the server (also running
> FreeBSD 3.2 with security patches, but with kernel PPP) to communicate
> via PPPoE rather than via the modems.
Why use PPPoE -- you really prefer to toss away gobs of bandwidth?
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in thi
o create dedicated routes from one subnet to
another without requiring them to spread the routes across the entire
installation.
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 10:41:54AM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> > This allows a crude sort of "policy routing", if that is of any value.
> > I do
llinfo A.B.C.Drt
> >
> > Show us the output of `route -nv get A.B.C.D'.
>
> And we will see that this route has an indirect gateway!
Right. Peter, you probably need a default route pointing at whatever
your router to the rest of the net
t gateways.
This allows a crude sort of "policy routing", if that is of any value.
I don't see what it hurts, or any reason to remove it. A misconfigured
routing table is a system administration problem, not a code problem.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in thi
Design and Implementation of the 4.4BSD Operating
System" by McKusick et al.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with &q
Nick Rogness wrote:
>
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Wes Peters wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Packet 1 comes in through ISP #2 network. It comes into your
> > > > internal network to machine 1. Machine 1 replies to the
> >
VLANs,
end-to-end QoS reservations that prefer links that can provide QoS, etc.,
but the ability of just about anyone to correctly configure such things
has yet to be shown in my experience.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
We
Unless your running a routing
> daemon. But is that really practical with cable modems, dsl, etc?...I
> don't think so.
Why would the physical media have anything to do with routing protocols?
> > What if you are running na
e possible to write a routing daemon that somehow snarfs each
of the addresses that hit the default route and play traceroute games to
determine which of your public addresses have a "better" path to it, but
what Nick really really needs to do is
Nick Rogness wrote:
>
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Wes Peters wrote:
>
> [Wes, if you get this, for some reason I can't send to your
> domain.]
>
> You are not understanding what I am trying to say. Once again I'll try to
> clarif
need anything other than a default route.
If it's not bound for the internal network, it goes to the external
network, by definition.
I completely fail to see that you have actually stated a problem yet.
What exactly is the problem you think you're trying to solve here?
--
Ah. Ick. Perl. Bleh.
>
> He'd have the same problem in C (except that the compiler would catch it -
> INADDR_ANY is not a string, I guess that is your point?)
Yeah, it should either check the type or convert it appropriately: the C
way, or the Python
Paulo Fragoso wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Wes Peters wrote:
>
> > Paulo Fragoso wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've written a little server using perl, it's working fine using FBSD 4.x
> > > but when I try with FBSD
o bind to a port < 1024.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
ddress
is on the same subnet as the first network address for this in-
terface, a netmask of 0x has to be specified.
Somebody should look to see if the man page is true, or if you have to use
a netmask of 0x for all aliases.
people who might be interested. ;^)
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECT
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
terrupts driving the system into
interrupt livelock, as long as the card is smart enough to discard
packets without interrupting when its own buffers are full.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters
ing send() on UDP sockets.
>
> ENOBUFS == ESYSADMINNEEDSTORAISENMBCLUSTERS
Or perhaps ENOBUFS == E_SYSTEM_NEEDS_TO_RAISE_NMBCLUSTERS_ALL_ON_ITS_OWN?
A starting point, increment, and ceiling, based on the memory size of the
system, might be a more reasona
sessions concurrently)
Win2K has IPSec built in. I haven't tried it vs. FreeBSD yet, but will
be soon.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ables, but that still needs some work.
>
> man natd
> man ipfw
> man divert
Well said. Unfortunately, you didn't include Mr. Cherko's email so I
cannot reply to him as well. You can also accomplish this using ipfilter
and ipnat. Some of us prefer ipfilter to ipfw, and ip
return (EAGAIN);
+ return (EADDRNOTAVAIL);
}
++*lastport;
if (*lastport < first || *lastport > last)
--
"W
implements what? Returning EAGAIN when no ephemeral ports are
available? That is all the above really says, and then provides a hint
as to how to fix it. The description is a little simplistic, as it misses
the lowfirst-lowlast and highfirst-highlast rang
fos from experienced
> admins in "good" hardware devices to connect to
> the PC.
The ones Warner Losh makes? ;^)
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo