On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 05:24:06 -0800, Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 05:13:21 -0800, Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:20:10 +0200, Ari Suutari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > &
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 05:13:21 -0800, Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:20:10 +0200, Ari Suutari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > The counters for queue 1 keeps increasing when I do a ftp out even for
> > > non-ACK packe
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:20:10 +0200, Ari Suutari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The counters for queue 1 keeps increasing when I do a ftp out even for
> > non-ACK packets but the other counters for queue 2-4 doesn't move at
> > all so it seems like everything is going out one queue instead of what
>
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 13:09:00 +0100, Joost Bekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 02:16:42AM -0800, Vincent Poy wrote:
>
>
> > 63004 667879129410867 queue 1 tcp from any to any tcpflags ack out
> > 63005 1 40 queue 2 t
Hi,
I don't know how to explain my problem but it goes something like this...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2:05am][/home/vince] >> ipfw show
00049 1557131244839199 skipto 100 ip from 208.201.244.224/29 to any
00050 12072800468 917651580916 divert 8668 ip from any to any via xl0
00100 69518
I am experiencing the same problem as well when I updated from a March
6, 2004 -CURRENT to the October 19, 2004 -CURRENT. The problem still
exists with the October 27, 2004 -CURRENT. I'm using ipfw/dummynet
for outgoing queues with the ACK packets having the highest priority
in it's own queue. H
Hello everyone:
On FreeBSD with ipfw/dummynet for traffic shaping, one uses the
pipe with:
ipfw pipe 1 config bw size
to set the size of the pipe. I noticed on Linux, they can set a burst
size so it can burst a x number over the pipe size, is there a similar
setting available? Also, I
Greetings everyone:
I have a question on the Intel Gigabit NIC's. Other than price,
is there any difference in performance (full wire speed) between the
Pro/1000T and the Pro/1000MT. Thanks.
Cheers,
Vince - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Vice President __
Unix Networ
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > > whether or not you have "options BRIDGE' in your kernel config file.
> > > (or a message saying "BRIDGE ..." when the system boots)
> >
> > My kernel config doesn't have the BRIDGE option so I guess the
> > bridging code is part of ET's drivers.
>
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > I don't have a dmesg.boot, only a dmesg.yesterday and dmesg.today.
> > What specifically should I be looking for?
>
> whether or not you have "options BRIDGE' in your kernel config file.
> (or a message saying "BRIDGE ..." when the system boots)
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >
> > > Pardon me, but what bridging code are you using ? Is it from Etinc
> > > or it is the std FreeBSD bridging code ?
> >
> > I'm not sure if the bridging code is from ET or if it's the
> > standard Free
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Pardon me, but what bridging code are you using ? Is it from Etinc
> or it is the std FreeBSD bridging code ?
I'm not sure if the bridging code is from ET or if it's the
standard FreeBSD but it seems to be standard FreeBSD bridging code.
root@oa
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > I cvsuped three hours ago and the same ARP troubles happened.
>
> can you repeat exactly what the problem was (bridge machine not
> responding to ARP requests ?) and what is your exact setup (i
> am interested in ipfw config, and the following sysctl v
Speaking about routing in FreeBSD, is there a way to do multipath
routing to a destination?
Cheers,
Vince - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Vice President __
Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | / |[__ ]
WurldLink Corporation
14 matches
Mail list logo
