Re: Double lock issue of unp_link_rwlock in usrreq.c observed

2016-05-19 Thread Steve Kiernan
UNP_LINK_WLOCK() <—— 2nd Call > > Let me know your thoughts or if you need more information. Thanks ! I suspect that this UNP_LINK_WLOCK() should become an assert. However, I'm not clear on the implications of removing the UNP_LINK_WUNLOCK() farther down in pru_det

[JNPR] Network stack as a module (RFC)

2015-07-21 Thread Steve Kiernan
). I will get more reviews out on Phabricator soon with the other changes. -- Steve Kiernan Principal Engineer, Core OS/Kernel Group Juniper Networks, Inc. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-n

Re: [JNPR] Proposal for changes to network device drivers and network stack (RFC)

2013-01-22 Thread Steve Kiernan
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 10:56:24 +1100 Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2013-Jan-17 14:38:06 -0500, "Stephen J. Kiernan" > wrote: > >The patch also includes moving zlib.[ch] and zlibutil.h out of net and > >into sys/libkern (for the .c) and sys/sys (for the .h). > > Good. > > >It really doesn't make muc

Re: Proposal for changes to network device drivers and network stack (RFC)

2013-01-17 Thread Steve Kiernan
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:07:06 +0100 Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > On 17 Jan 2013, at 22:53, Steve Kiernan wrote: > > > On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:11:27 +0100 > > Andre Oppermann wrote: > > > >> On 17.01.2013 20:23, Stephen J. Kiernan wrote: > >>&

Re: Proposal for changes to network device drivers and network stack (RFC)

2013-01-17 Thread Steve Kiernan
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:11:27 +0100 Andre Oppermann wrote: > On 17.01.2013 20:23, Stephen J. Kiernan wrote: > > The network stack as a module patch has been separated out and can be found > > in the following location: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~marcel/Juniper/netstack-v2.diff > > This is qu