Re: PF or "traceroute -e -P TCP" bug?

2006-10-14 Thread Rostislav Krasny
Hi, On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:59:38 -0700 "Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:23:50AM +0200, Daniel Hartmeier wrote: > > [ I'm CC'ing Crist, maybe he can explain why -e behaves like it does ] [hided] > So, to expand on the three points above, we need (1) fixed

Re: PF or "traceroute -e -P TCP" bug?

2006-08-21 Thread Rostislav Krasny
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:23:50 +0200 Daniel Hartmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ I'm CC'ing Crist, maybe he can explain why -e behaves like it does ] > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:57:56PM +0300, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > > > I've tried the new "-

PF or "traceroute -e -P TCP" bug?

2006-08-18 Thread Rostislav Krasny
Hi, I've tried the new "-e" traceroute option on today's RELENG_6 and found following problem: > traceroute -nq 1 -e -P TCP -p 80 216.136.204.117 traceroute to 216.136.204.117 (216.136.204.117), 64 hops max, 52 bytepackets 1 192.168.1.1 0.619 ms 2 10.0.0.138 2.108 ms 3 192.168.1.1 0.481

RES_DFLRETRY in resolv.h

2006-02-18 Thread Rostislav Krasny
Hi, According to resolver(5) manual page the number of times the resolver will send a query to each of its name servers before giving up and returning an error to the calling application is a RES_DFLRETRY defined in resolv.h. For years FreeBSD had no RES_DFLRETRY macro defined in resolv.h and had

default resolver(5) configuration and behavior of functions like gethostbyname(3)

2004-09-30 Thread Rostislav Krasny
Hello all. Please consider following two questions: 1. According to the resolver(5) manual page the default number of times the resolver will send a query to each of its name servers is defined as RES_DFLRETRY in resolv.h standard header file. Actually there was no RES_DFLRETRY in the resolv.h bef

Re: PPPoE and troubles with TCP

2003-01-01 Thread Rostislav Krasny
I make few further testings... According to http://uptime.netcraft.net/up/graph?site=www.ssh.com the host www.ssh.com uses NetBSD or OpenBSD operating system. When my box is configured according to the following expression: net.inet.tcp.rfc1323 == 1 (that is the default for FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE),

Re: PPPoE and troubles with TCP

2002-12-31 Thread Rostislav Krasny
the second packet have MSS == 1452 in case of Win98SE usage and MSS == 1460 in case of FreeBSD usage (before and after TCP reconfiguration)? How MRU == MTU == 1484 (or smaller) helped before TCP of my FreeBSD was reconfigured? P.S. Happy new year! :-)) --- Rostislav Krasny <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: PPPoE and troubles with TCP

2002-12-29 Thread Rostislav Krasny
quot;Total length" and to the "Flags" in the IP header. --- Rostislav Krasny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To produce these tcpdump's log files I used two terminals. In the > first > I ran 'tcpdump -n > filename' and in the second I ran 'links U

Re: PPPoE and troubles with TCP

2002-12-28 Thread Rostislav Krasny
--- Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > look at the tcp mssfixup option in ppp This option is enabled by default in ppp, look what `man 8 ppp` says: [tcp]mssfixup Default: Enabled. This option tells ppp to adjust TCP SYN pack- ets so that the maximum receive segment size is not

Re: PPPoE and troubles with TCP

2002-12-28 Thread Rostislav Krasny
--- Gene Bomgardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here's my ppp.conf - the 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.0 > 0.0.0.0are the actual values used in the file. They bear no > relation to any IP addresses used in my network whatsoever. Why > they work; the /0 says there are no significant b

Re: PPPoE and troubles with TCP

2002-12-26 Thread Rostislav Krasny
--- Greg Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Note: Cc list trimmed; cross-posting not recommended; please >watch these things.] > > Rostislav Krasny wrote: > > | Maybe PPPoE implementation in FreeBSD have a bug? > > The data you have provided is ina

RE: PPPoE and troubles with TCP

2002-12-26 Thread Rostislav Krasny
--- Sten_Daniel_Sørsdal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Have you remembered to setup anything to fix the MSS in TCP packets > going through? RASPPPOE in my Win98SE have such option enabled by default. It's described there to solve problem with ICS (Internet Connection Sharing). I don't see any d

Re: PPPoE and troubles with TCP

2002-12-26 Thread Rostislav Krasny
--- Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 14:41, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > > --- Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 13:16, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > > > > --- Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: PPPoE and troubles with TCP

2002-12-26 Thread Rostislav Krasny
--- Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 13:16, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > > --- Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 12:26, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > > > > Hello > > > > > >

Re: PPPoE and troubles with TCP

2002-12-26 Thread Rostislav Krasny
--- Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 12:26, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > > Hello > > > > I have Alcatel Speedtouch Home ADSL modem. I use PPPoE protocol for > > connection with my Internet Service Provider (ISP) through this ADSL >

PPPoE and troubles with TCP

2002-12-26 Thread Rostislav Krasny
Hello I have Alcatel Speedtouch Home ADSL modem. I use PPPoE protocol for connection with my Internet Service Provider (ISP) through this ADSL modem. I use FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE and ppp (a.k.a. user-ppp) for this. In the /etc/ppp/ppp.conf file I have ' set MRU 1492' and ' set MTU 1492' options. This