Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-09 Thread Prafulla Deuskar
Pyun YongHyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:51:21PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: > > This is a patch for the stack and the em driver to enable TSO > > on CURRENT. Previously I had problems getting it to work, but > > this is functional. > > > > I should note that CURRENT

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-05 Thread Prafulla Deuskar
Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Prafulla Deuskar wrote: > >Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >>On 9/2/06, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>I can't comment on the em part but the tcp_out

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-05 Thread Prafulla Deuskar
Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 9/2/06, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I can't comment on the em part but the tcp_output.c stuff looks > >very much like a straight port from NetBSD. If we take code from > >the other BSDs we have to remark this in the emails we send with

Re: RFC: FreeBSD I/OAT driver

2006-08-30 Thread Prafulla Deuskar
Andrew Gallatin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Jack Vogel writes: > > We are making our development driver for the I/OAT engine available for > > download, experimentation, and comment available at: > > > > > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=42302&package_id=20222

Disable/Enable Interrupts in ISR

2003-04-04 Thread Prafulla Deuskar
All, foo_intr() { ... disable_intr; ... process data; ... enable_intr; } Most of the network drivers currently do something like this in the ISR. Is this really necessary as by the time ISR is called interrupts have already been disabled on APIC and disabling interrupts on network card has no eff

Re: Trouble with gigabit cards

2002-11-07 Thread Prafulla Deuskar
rom 50), and this seems to have solved the problem. Any guidelines > for reasonable values? Is there some way I can set this in the kernel > other than by using sysctl? > > Thanks for your help! > Jason Carroll > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Prafulla Deuskar wrote: > >

Re: ENOBUFS

2002-10-18 Thread Prafulla Deuskar
FYI. 82543 doesn't support PCI-X protocol. For PCI-X support use 82544, 82545 or 82546 based cards. -Prafulla Kelly Yancey [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 10:27:04AM -0700, Kelly Yancey wrote: > > ... > > > Hmm. Might that ex

Re: ENOBUFS

2002-10-18 Thread Prafulla Deuskar
Transmit/Receive Interrupt Delay values are in units of 1.024 microseconds. The em driver currently uses these to enable interrupt coalescing on the cards. Thanks, Prafulla To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Fwd: mbuf chain

2002-09-24 Thread Prafulla Deuskar
Sorry for the cross-posting. All, Is there a pre-set limit on maximum number of fragments in a mbuf chain ? I see 64 fragments with jumboframes (mtu 9000) using nttcp. Thanks, Prafulla - End forwarded message - To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTEC

Intel gigabit driver

2001-11-28 Thread Prafulla Deuskar
All, Intel Corporation has released a gigabit driver for PRO/1000 series of adapters. The driver is available for download from the following url: http://appsr.intel.com/scripts-df/Product_Filter.asp?ProductID=415 The driver will be committed to -CURRENT first and MFC'ed to -STABLE later. T