Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Prafulla Deuskar wrote: > >Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >>On 9/2/06, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>I can't comment on the em part but the tcp_output.c stuff looks > >>>very much like a straight port from NetBSD. If we take code from > >>>the other BSDs we have to remark this in the emails we send with > >>>patches and the commit message (otherwise we get accused of 'stealing > >>>without attribution'). > >> > >>I dont know that I'd call it a straight port, rather I was working from > >>some > >>prototype code that Prafulla had working back on 4.7, but I think at that > >>time that he may have patterned it after NetBSD. > > > >I don't think NetBSD had TSO support in 2002 when I first did the 4.7 > >patch for internal testing. > > OK, perhaps they lifted it from your patch then. They just looks awfully > similiar that's why I thought it came from NetBSD. > Your patch looks good and is the way to go.
So after Jack confirms that your patch works with the em driver would you commit to to -current? The driver related changes can follow.. Later we also need to fix ifconfig so that user can enable/disable TSO on the interface. Thanks, -Prafulla > _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
