Phil Regnauld wrote:
>Michal Vanco (vanco) writes:
>
>
>>On Sunday 19 June 2005 21:54, Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>My vote is that we should implement this functionality
On Sunday 19 June 2005 21:54, Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote:
> Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it
> > switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is.
> >
> > What is opinion of other networkers?
>
> How about also adding a sysctl for setting
On Sunday 19 June 2005 10:29, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:14:32PM +0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> J> Second, you may need a route daemon for this. ospf is a well known
> J> canditate where convergence in case of lost link is a must.
>
> While an OSPF daemon may stop advertis
