Ok, I'll check it out. Thanks!
On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 2:21 AM Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 04.10.2023 03:02, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >
> > I had a problem with one network and had to restart (service
> > wpa_supplicant restart wlan0). My Iv4 came up file, but
I had a problem with one network and had to restart (service wpa_supplicant
restart wlan0). My Iv4 came up file, but IPv6 does not come up. Interface
has only link-local address. When I boot to the same AP, it comes up fine.
Any idea what I'm missing?
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herde
st a fix?
>
> Reboot did not solve, no software updates made, no config changes, just
> stop working from one day to the next.
>
> Thank you.
>
> --
> José Pérez
>
Oddly, ENOBUFS is the error I get when my firewall is blocking transmit
traffic. There may well be other causes.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
/22"
> > ifconfig_bce0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv"
> >
> Thank You so much. That works here too. I wonder if this deserves a
> document somewhere?
> It's NOT intuitively obvious that:
> a) Order in /etc/rc.conf matters
> b) the fe80 address influences the global address
>
I don't see how 'a' is possible. All rc.conf does is defne a bunch of
environmental variables. I don't see any way the order is relevant other
than that a later definition of a variable overriding an earlier one. What
am I missing here?
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
strength is
enough to work well before splitting. If you have a friend who is a ham
radio operator, they could help a lot.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
a problem indicator? If so, what should I look for. Otherwise, how
can I stop these messages from filling my log?
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
Thanks! This is really great news!
One question though. The status report shows the iwl driver as supporting
"7k/8k/9k/22k" devices. In the insanity of product models vs. chip models
vs. marketing names, is the AX200 one of these?
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retir
ine a bit. It's just really hard to do anything with a laptop with no
WiFi connectivity.
Thanks in advance!
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39
g top
or building large ports with no problems.
I do recall a time when my terminal emulator would occasionally freeze, but
I have not seen it for quite a while. I use mate-terminal. This was a
problem with the emulator, though, and also would lock up local operation
as well as ssh sessions.
--
Have you loaded kernel modules for other algorithms? I believe only newreno
is in the default kernel. "man 4 mod_cc" for available modules and other
information.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP F
Use tcpdump(1) and/or net/wireshark(5). See man tcpdump and pcap-filter for
usage details. wireshark can analyze files collected by tcpdump and dissect
the packets. It can also do packet capture, itself.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 8:56 PM Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Hiroki Sato wrote:
> > va> Can any IPv6 unicast or link-local address be configured as an
> anycast
> > va> address of a router?
> >
> > Yes. There is no restriction about address scope.
> >
> > You might want to read RFC 4291, which defin
nfig igb0 up
>
> I think the problem is when the network card loses ethernet link and then
> errors occurs with non-working interface.
>
No idea whether it will do the trick, but you might try "service netif
restart ibg0". It does a lot more than just down-up of the interfa
y most OSes
including Windows, MacOS, Linux and FreeBSD that IPv6 and IPv4 will be
enabled by default. As time goes on, it will likely be more and more likely
that disabling IPv6 will become difficult if networks are used at all. It
already really requires a custom kernel to completely remove it and,
un
SLAAC without rtsold, but it may not prove stable as it is not possible to
deal with router changes after network startup. (I do run rtsold on my
laptop even though I only need it when not connecting to my home network
and that net supports IPv6.)
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herde
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 5:17 PM Marius Halden wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018, at 01:50, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 1:14 PM Marius Halden wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018, at 21:34, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> > > > On 8
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 1:14 PM Marius Halden wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018, at 21:34, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> > On 8/28/18 12:30 PM, Marius Halden wrote:
> > > tx_frames does move, rx_frames is stuck at zero. The following
> counters are non-zero and does increase when traffic is sent through th
FreeBSD, but it may also be tied to Firefox.
Is anyone else seeing this? I'm not sure how common it is to run
log_in_vain, so it may be common, but little noticed.
Thanks for any clues about this.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.co
Thank you! You have given me an obvious and relevant example of why
"shutdown -r" should normally be used and "reboot" should not. I don't use
NFS, so it has not bitten me. I do recall dealing with similar issue MANY
years ago on Solaris systems working with Auspex file se
n page for sync(8) really needs updating. It is unchanged other than
fixing wording and formatting since 4.4-lite and probably that was largely
unchanged from AT&T V4. I probably should open a ticket.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP
ance.
Are others seeing this? Any suggestions for troubleshooting? I don't see
much in the way of statistics or diagnostic information on iwn. the man
page gives me no clues.
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
f this device and plan to remove it from FreeBSD-12 if not.
>
> -- Brooks
>
Just for the record, Neterion was acquired by Exar, an old-line hybrid IC
company in 2010 and Exar was acquired last year by MaxLinear. Looks like
Exar bought them for some of their tech and killed off the Ethe
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 9:38 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > 06.02.2018 1:37, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >
> > > My ancient Intel Centrino (iwn) card does 11n, HOSTAP and 5G. Or, at
> least
> > > it did as I have not tried HOSTAP for a fe
getting along with the wpa_supplicant in 11. It can take many
minutes to sync up on re-boot. It also goes "DOWN" very briefly a few times
a day, but it comes back up very quickly from these, so I may have a
hardware issue on my almost 7 year-old ThinkPad T520.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part ti
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:46 PM, DES <3...@inx.su> wrote:
> Hello FreeBSD-Net,
>
> does anybody remember, around year 2004, there was a software application
> available (either as port, or package). Unfortunately I do not recall the
> application name and I'm not able to find it again, although I'v
ot. Do I need
to write a little rc.d script to run after /usr is mounted and before the
network starts? Of is there a better way?
Thanks!
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B05
oad the source from a repository. Be
sure the file in your source directory is the current, unmodified file.
Edit the file or files as needed to correct the bug
Generate the diff with the command "svn diff
path-to-directory-containing-file(s) > diff-file.diff"
Update the bug report a
5 09:41:13 rogue kernel: need promiscuous mode update callback
I don't see how this is even possible as I always thought syslog messages
were atomic. Guess not.
Again, this is not causing problems that I am aware of, but is a bit
disturbing.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired N
dware revisions can trigger
driver issues that don't break things on most variants. And, lest I knew,
RealTek did not provide documentation adequate to write a driver and this
makes drivers more likely to have subtle bugs.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid her
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Glen Barber <
g...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:20:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:55:13AM -0700, Kevi
hours right now.
On Aug 24, 2016 12:46 PM, "Glen Barber" wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:20:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:55:13AM -0700, Kevin Oberm
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:55:13AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Not working right. I do see 802.11 messages but nothing from iwn.
> > Rebuilt with:
> > optionsIEEE80211_DEBUG
> &g
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Kevin Oberman <
kob6...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Adrian Chadd <
> adrian.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Compile in IWN_DEBUG and IEEE80211_DEBUG and then do:
>>
>> wlande
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Vinícius Zavam <
egyp...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> 2016-08-20 23:07 GMT-03:00 Adrian Chadd :
>
>> On 20 August 2016 at 19:02, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> > On Aug 20, 2016 6:29 PM, "Adrian Chadd" wrote:
>> >
ess. It seems
worse when my phone is the hot spot than with my home router.
>
>
> On Aug 19, 2016 3:48 PM, "Kevin Oberman" wrote:
>>
>> Lately I have had serious issues with my system successfully associating.
>> These were not present with 10.3.
>>
>>
: ioctl[SIOCS80211, op=103,
val=0, arg_len=128]: Operation now in progress
Aug 19 00:14:53 rogue wpa_supplicant[1634]: wlan0: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-FAILED
ret=-1 retry=1
Is anyone else seeing this?
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.c
and no routes.
I did "service dhclient restart wlan0" which assigned the address and that
resolved hte issue until I reboot.
Is this a known issue? Should I open a bug report? This would leave me in a
bad position should I ever need to reboot the system remotely or should it
crash when I a
ce. So far
> nothing I tweak makes a noticeable difference. I'm increasingly skeptical
> that I am going to find a setting or two that more than doubles the speed I
> am currently experiencing.
>
> I am open to any and all suggestions at this point.
>
> Thank you!
> Chris
>
stems have a default gateway defined, this may relate to the issue
you are seeing. I'm very unclear what happens with 0/0 if default is not
defined.
FWIW, here is what I see on this system (10.3-STABLE r299096):
Routing tables
Internet:
DestinationGatewayFlags Net
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff <
nikl...@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> wrote:
> Kevin Oberman [2016-05-26 21:11 -0700] :
>
> > The most valid use is when you can only get a /64 from your provider.
>
> I got a /112 for each of my virtual servers...
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff <
st...@niklaas.eu> wrote:
> I was eventually able to solve this issue. I asked for help on several
> mailing lists. So, for reference, here are links to the relevant
> threads:
>
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions
a compromised system.
While I don't like the idea of hiding these messages at all and think
dealing with the issue through syslog.conf more appropriate, at least don't
let the setting be changed on a running system!
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder a
tmask" al
together.
ifconfig ue0 inet 192.168.2.176/24
Aside form no longer using a form of addressing that had been obsolete for
20 years, quotation marks won't matter.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03F
.
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:46:52 -
boot, this is when you need to replace
/boot/kernel/kernel with your custom kernel. If the kernel was not changed,
you won't be required to reboot, though I do recommend doing so to be sure
that no vulnerable code is left running.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engin
ding a rule to block them? I can't provide a sample
rule as I don't use pf, but you want to block ICMP type 5 messages.
For a good overview of redirects, see either Wikipedia
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Control_Message_Protocol#Redirect>
or Cisco
<http://www.cisco.co
in any way inaccurate. However,
it is entirely possible to get misleading results if options not properly
selected.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
__
er is theoretically useless as it is on the same network than the
> FreeBSD one.
>
> Do you have any idea about this issue? Did I make a mistake or is it a
> bug?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Alarig Le Lay
>
Take a look at route(8). There are significant syntax differences. E.g
t; I already have powerd_flags="-a max -b max -n max" in rc.conf, which I
> > hope should be enough.
>
>
> I suspect it might not touch the c states, but better check. The safest is
> disable them in the bios.
>
To disable C-States:
sysctl dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest=C1
nce. The man page
describes it and how to run it quite clearly. For lots of tuning
recommendations for truly high performance, see FasterData
<http://fasterdata.es.net/>. Unfortunately, since my retirement five years
ago, I believe that all work has moved to Linux, so there may not be much
s
//fasterdata.es.net. In particular, they have documented the issues
with ssh over long latency links at
http://fasterdata.es.net/data-transfer-tools/say-no-to-scp/.
It is VERY hard to get good performance on high latency links in the bast
of cases and, unfortunately, ssh/scp makes
rity mandated that there be nothing allowed
until they were put in place by firewall.conf (which ran WAY too late to do
the job.) I don't recall who shot it down, but I was quite annoyed that
someone who was clearly clueless about IPv6 would just toss a PR on a
subject he didn't know. It wa
volume data transfers (very large flows), a
single CPU solution does work best. But if Barney is going at this with his
usual attitude, it's probably not worth it to continue the discussion.
--
Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E
and provide a fair bit up useful information
and a reasonable "heads-up" for problem status.
I suspect that once Sean has hit most of the old (some really old) tickets,
things will quiet down a fair bit. (But I could be wrong.) I love seeing
tickets being taken care of.
--
Kevin Oberma
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 09:40:46PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:29 PM, <[1]kpn...@pobox.com> wrote:
> >
> > I just got a /56 block of ipv6 addresses today and I'm trying to
> >
e address on their router(s). The remainder of the
/56 is yours but I could not swear to that.
You will probably want more than one /64 for different purposes. Other than
externally accessible servers, you should put systems in a different /64
and spread them at random around that space if t
provides that notion, and the interface has had
a previously assigned address, but I agree that this is debatable. I think
the word "notion" provides a clear indication of the intent. I know that
Windows XP-SP2 behaved this way. I have not looked at anything more recent
as that what
; could take a look.
>
> -Dan
>
I just tried this and it worked fine for me. All files were compressed and
suffixed with ".gz".
My command was:
tcpdump -i wlan0 -p -G 500 -z gzip -s0 -w test.pcap.%Y-%m-%d-%H:%M:%S
While I didn't think any options were positio
to look up addresses for FreeBSD systems, or
build a list of freebsd.org names. That might work, but it would be a bit
painful. Especially since there may multiple addresses for a single name.
--
Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
_
quot;some_file.bpf" and then you can use other tools to
analyze it. I use wireshark. It's free, in ports and works quite well. It
will flag packets which have issues and handle breaking down the prorocols.
Since port 81 is not the "normal" http port, you will need to tell
w
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:11 PM, David DeSimone
wrote:
> Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >
> > For ipfw you need something like "allow ip from any to me frag". If you
> > want to restrict this to DNS, restrict it to dst-port 53.
>
> Unfortunately, UDP fragments onl
gt; not TCP.
>
> Is it Ok? Is it misconfiguration of my networks (I have such problem
> in tow different installations) or something?
>
> - --
> // Lev Serebryakov
>
Does the system have a firewall? If so, is it configured to allow
fragments?
For ipfw you need something like "
achable other than
10.1.1.206 and 127.0.0.2.
I just learned today that the handbook has a very nice tutorial on jailing
BIND. It will probably save a lot of time if you check it out at
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails-ezjail.html#jails-ezjail-example-bind
As the ha
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Marcelo Gondim
wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> On 13/12/2014 23:44, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Marcelo Gondim
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear,
>>>
>>> I'm having trouble resolving domain na
ing and tracing to these addresses. All of them are in very dispersed
locations on different provider backbones. (Cogent, Hurricane Electric, and
ISC, itself. You might try directing queries to each system to see if one
fails when other succeed. Use "dig @servr-addr host".
--
R. Kevin Oberm
ases
SLAAC (and, perhaps DHCPv6) along with things like NDP and RTSOL do allof
hte configuration. If ipv6_activate_)all_interfaces is NO, only explicitly
configured interfaces will run IPv6. If it i YES, any interface with no
explicit configuration will auto-configure and run IPv6.
The system I am typing this on is entirely auto-configured as are almost
all Windows systems running 7 or 8. (Maybe Vista, too. Don't recall.)
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
drctl and /etc/network.subr.
The list of prefixes set by it should match what I list above. If
'ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="NO"', or ipaddrctl_policy="ipv4_prefer",
you should get:
::1/128 50 0
::/0 40 1
::fff
uestion? ping6 to it is a trivial test.Many issues can arise when trying
ot get IPv6 running. Firewalls are a common issue.
What output do you get from "ip6addrctl show"? netstat -rnf inet6?
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
"sshd with zombie process on FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE
- workaround".
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubsc
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 11:44 AM, justin victoria wrote:
>
> On 3/9/2014 10:40 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> You might try installing iperf3 and testing with that. iperf3 is a major
> rewrite of iperf and is totally incompatible with the older version, so
> you will need to ins
9%re0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
> nd6 options=29
> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT )
> status: active
> lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384
> options=63
> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
> nd6 options=21
> [vic@yeaguy ~]
>
> I tried to remove rxcsum and txcsum, but that didnt really improve the
> behavior I almost convinced its a iperf issue? maybe.. after iperf
> testing i did a FTP transfer and it exceeded what iperf is claiming the
> throughput is.. so im not sure what to make of it.
>
You might try installing iperf3 and testing with that. iperf3 is a major
rewrite of iperf and is totally incompatible with the older version, so
you will need to install iperf3 on all systems
I doubt iperf is the issue, but this is a way to check.
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
nd congestion control.
Both wireshark and tcptrace are in ports and are best installed on a
workstation. The tcpdump output can be used as input to both. ("tcpdump -pw
FILE -i INTERFACE host ADDRESS" can do the job. Then copy the capture to
the right place for analysis. But start with configurat
sends multiple packets when is doesn't need to..
> http://people.freebsd.org/~julian/fbsd9.png
>
Ack! (Sorry) I could have sworn that this had been fixed. Has it been
re-broken?
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
om California to Europe and Australia.
(Yes, careful tuning was required.)
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscr
special applications, or any special
> > logic above the LAGG device.
> >
> > Describing how you are using LAGG (and why) might be better
> > than just asking for "improvements".
> >
> > BC
>
I am aware of at least one case where 100G WAN links ar
tering Extended Passive Mode (|||10613|)
>> 226 Transfer complete
>> 43474223104 bytes sent in 01:41 (410.09 MiB/s)
>> ftp>
>>
>> so still about 50% performance on 10GB
>>
>
> Out of interest have you tried limiting the number of queues?
>
> If not gi
Pv6 based on the destination specified, and options
> -4 / -6 like telnet has. Same for traceroute / traceroute6. However,
> this is an aside.)
>
> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no
>
Sorry to be so hackneyed, but...
+1
Sorry that I was unclear (and may
the
developer (I don't recall exactly who any more) that it was right and would
not be changed. I really would love to see this reconsidered before IPv6
becomes much more popular as it will simply cause confusion, but I, too,
fear that it is a lost cause.
Please prove me wrong!
--
R. Kevin Ob
PCAP code will capture the data very
early after it is received by the kernel, but the kernel still must do this
as it and only actually can "talk" to the interface and receive data.
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
_
one assigned by the router, a static from
rc.conf or DHCPv6? You should have two inet6 addresses, one is link-local
(starts with "fe") and another should start with "2". There may be more
than two.
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
_
y is that your sources from which you built the modified
geom_eli module are not the same as were used to build the kernel you
are running.
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
E-mail: kob6...@gmail.com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists
ned it on to
cause serious problems... yet!) It seems a shame to make everyone who
really has a need develop their own patches or dig though old mail to
find John's.
What I would like to see is a way to have it available, but make it
unlikely
hting the LED.
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
E-mail: kob6...@gmail.com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
great deal and is
very easy to work with. Just load the kernel module and use sysctls to
control it. I have used it in conjunction with tcpdump and wireshark
to find performance problems.
Also, for high performance on bulk data transfers over long, fat
pipes, take a look at http://fasterdata.e
used. What
key_mgmt are you specifying? It looks like authentication might be
failing. You might try running the supplicant manually (after stopping
any that is running) and see what you get.
> P.S. I ain't using IPv6... like not at all.
Unfortunate, but I can't run it at home, eit
ddity is that you specify your ssid in the rc.conf file while
using WPA. I've never seen that before. It's in my wpa_supplicant.conf
file. It seems more reasonable for a laptop that may need to associate
with a home and a work SSID as well as ones at conferences and, in my
case alternate
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 6:23 AM, Denise H. G. wrote:
>
> On 2012/10/09 at 00:44, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Denise H. G. wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi list,
>>&
ode?
Yes. Some vendors (e.g. Lenovo, HP) have private PCIIDs on their
cards, so they may not be in the source. Adding them is trivial, but,
should this be the issue, please open a PR to have it added to the
source in SVN.
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
E-mail: kob6...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 06/03/12 15:18, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Lawrence Stewart
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/31/12 13:33, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>>
>
on ANI (and I am not sure if new proposals are being
accepted), see:
http://www.es.net/RandD/advanced-networking-initiative/
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Sami Halabi wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >
ll work,
too. All 100G hardware is just a mite pricey, though it has dropped
tremendously over the past year and a half and I expect it will
continue to do so.
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
E-mail: kob6...@gmail.com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mail
d where on systems
that had numerous interfaces, though this was more common in the day
of async serial lines and modems.
I'll admit that I have mixed feelings about its practicality today,
though it does not hurt anything, as far as I can tell.
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network
e
FreeBSD drivers and is active in the FreeBSD community.
--
R. Kevin Oberman - Network Engineer
rkober...@gmail.com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 05/31/12 13:33, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> I used SIFTR at the suggestion of Lawrence Stewart who headed the
>>
>> project to bring plugable congestion algorithms to FreeBSD and found
>> real
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> On 05/24/12 18:55, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>>
>> This is,of course, on a 10G interface. On 7.3 there is little
>
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
>
> What you're seeing looks almost like a checksum is bad, or
> th
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> On 05/24/12 18:55, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>>
>> This is,of course, on a 10G interface. On 7.3 there is little
>
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
>
> What you're seeing looks almost like a checksum is bad, or
> th
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
wrote:
> On 24. May 2012, at 22:55 , Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>> When we set the ToS bits for less than best effort (also called
>> scavenger) on packets (ToS=32), performance on FreeBSD 8.2 is
>> terrible. It was as good as be
=4.1942 Mbps
0.5000 MB / 1.00 sec =4.1942 Mbps
This is,of course, on a 10G interface. On 7.3 there is little
difference between the two. We are using cubic CC on the 8.2 system.
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
E-mail: kob6...@gmail.com
s.
This assumes that it actually works as advertized, but the authors are
unlikely to have published this without thorough analysis and testing.
They are, after all, among the leading TCP experts in the world.
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
E-ma
Are you
seeing a large number of TCP sessions in partially closed states? I
don't recall if you mentioned it, but what version of FreeBSD are you
running?
If you have not dine so, I urge you to read the firewall(7) man page.
It discusses firewall design and implementation with IPF
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
