On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 14:36:22 +0900, Motonori Shindo wrote:
> Gary,
>
> From: Gary Corcoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: WEP problems with ndis and ath drivers
> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 23:05:11 -0500
>
> > Sam Leffler wrote:
> >
> > > It appears your AP requires shared-key authenticatio
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 21:55:05 +0800, Sam Leffler wrote:
> On Mar 21, 2004, at 9:35 AM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
> >
> >I have a Dell Inspiron 8500 laptop with an onboard TrueMobile 1300
> >(Broadcom, b/g chipset) and a Netgear WAG511 cardbus card (Atheros,
> &
I have a Dell Inspiron 8500 laptop with an onboard TrueMobile 1300
(Broadcom, b/g chipset) and a Netgear WAG511 cardbus card (Atheros, a/b/g
chipset).
I have a Netgear FWAG114 firewall/access point. (Atheros based, does a, b
and g.)
I'm running FreeBSD-current from Friday, March 19th. Both car
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 16:59:56 +0300, Boris Georgiev wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've got a Compaq Evo N620c notebook, which comes with a built-in lan network card -
> Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5705M. I researched on the hardware support for this NIC in
> FreeBSD and noticed that there is no hardware
[ taking -questions out of the CC list, please don't send things to more
than 2 lists, the mail servers don't usually allow it in any case. ]
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 13:41:38 +1000, Christopher Smith wrote:
> We have two firewalls sitting on gigabit links. Each has 2 Netgear GA620
> (ti driver)
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:17:03 -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
> > I'm planning on checking in the zero copy sockets code Tuesday evening,
> > MDT. If there are any concerns, I'm more than willing to delay it.
>
&g
I'm planning on checking in the zero copy sockets code Tuesday evening,
MDT. If there are any concerns, I'm more than willing to delay it.
I've also released a new snapshot, based on -current from June 23rd, 2002:
http://people.freebsd.org/~ken/zero_copy/
The following changes went into this
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 21:06:46 -0400, Barney Wolff wrote:
> Er, you would appear to be measuring the transfer rate of your disk,
> unless you actually have enough ram to cache a 1.2GB file.
>
> By coincidence, tonight I hooked my dual 1.0GHz PIII running fbsd 4.6-stable
> to a Mac G4 OS-X (also
I've released a new zero copy sockets snapshot, based on -current from June
20th, 2002.
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ken/zero_copy
This fixes the following issues:
- Use SLIST_FIRST() macros to access the first entry in a SLIST in
uipc_jumbo.c. I didn't fix all of these when Alfred pointed
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 11:45:11 -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 11:24:05AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> > Bosko Milekic writes:
>
> > > By the way, my other two comments have been deleted, but reading the
> > > page that Ken maintains I noticed that Alfred already po
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 00:43:13 -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 10:36:36PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> >
> > I've released a new zero copy sockets snapshot, against -current from June
> > 18th, 2002.
> >
> > http://people.FreeBSD
I've released a new zero copy sockets snapshot, against -current from June
18th, 2002.
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ken/zero_copy
The fixes that went into this snapshot:
- Take mutex locking out of ti_attach(), it isn't really needed.
As long as we can assume that probes of successive ti(4)
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 04:37:04 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 10-Jun-2002 Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> > 3. ti_attach() calls bus_alloc_resource(), which through a ton of calls
> > ends up calling vm_map_entry_create(), same problem as above.
> >
> > 4. ti_at
I have released a new zero copy sockets snapshot, the code and a brief
update on what has been fixed is here:
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ken/zero_copy
In short, I fixed the following things, which were found by Alfred
Perlstein:
- fix a race in the vm object allocation in jumbo_vm_init()
- u
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 13:15:43 -0400, Don Bowman wrote:
> > Andrew Gallatin writes:
> >> Kenneth D. Merry writes:
> >> >
> >> > I have released a new set of zero copy sockets patches, against
> -current
> >> > from today (May 17th,
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 13:12:09 -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> Kenneth D. Merry writes:
> >
> > I have released a new set of zero copy sockets patches, against -current
> > from today (May 17th, 2002).
> >
> > The main change is to deal with the vfs
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 09:03:38 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 18-May-2002 Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> > On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 23:02:55 -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >> * Kenneth D. Merry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020517 22:40] wrote:
> >> >
> &
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 23:02:55 -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Kenneth D. Merry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020517 22:40] wrote:
> >
> > I have released a new set of zero copy sockets patches, against -current
> > from today (May 17th, 2002).
> >
> > The ma
I have released a new set of zero copy sockets patches, against -current
from today (May 17th, 2002).
The main change is to deal with the vfs_ioopt changes that Alan Cox made in
kern_subr.c. (They conflicted a bit with the zero copy receive code.)
The patches and the FAQ are available here:
h
I have released a new zero copy sockets snapshot; the patches are against
yesterday's (May 3rd) -current.
The astute reader may note that it has been quite a while (November 2000)
since my last zero copy code release, and all I can say is "time,
motivation, lack of local equipment".
Anyway, the
On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 11:48:56 -0500, Matthew Rezny wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion, it set me in the right direction. I checked
> my fibre before but went ahead and checked it again. In doing so, I
> rearranged the cables at the switch to check if that made a difference.
> Sure enough, one p
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 16:36:06 -0400, Sam Tannous wrote:
> >From what I've seen in this list, this seems
> to be the best performing gigabit ethernet card
> on FreeBSD. Most stores now stock the newer
> 3c985B-SX rather then the 3c985-SX. Does the existing
> driver handle the newer "b" card as
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 15:55:30 -0500, Matthew Rezny wrote:
> I have some more information since my initial posting yesterday. I set
> the NMBCLUSTERS back to default, which made no difference. Therefore,
> moving from 4.3 to 4.4 is what drastically increased the frequency at
> which the link goe
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 17:08:32 -0400, stanislav shalunov wrote:
> stanislav shalunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'll try increasing the value of TI_JSLOTS to 8192 (twice the number
> > of 4K packets in 16MB window) and see if it makes a difference.
>
> FWIW, this seems to have improved
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 00:30:58 +0300, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
> Kenneth D. Merry writes:
>
> > http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ken/zero_copy
> >
> > There are diffs posted above against -current as of early November 28th,
> > along with a FAQ, and chan
25 matches
Mail list logo
