On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 22:43, "divyansh.nankani" wrote:
> Hi ,
> I am intending to participate in GSoC for FreeBSD this year. I need a bit of
> help navigating where to start contributing to FreeBSD for issues/features
> specifically related to the GSoC projects I am targeting :
> - Improve
just have 2 external NICs; one exclusively for
the virtualbox systems. I have no idea if you have a virtualbox guest
present, but if so that was my fix.
The issue occurred on both igb and re NICs.
-Joseph
On 2019-07-08 12:13, Dan Lists wrote:
> I have a server running FreeBSD 11.2 that I
This turned out to be a limitation of the box we are using, there is apparently
hardware between the ixgbevf chip and the fiber.
Joe Buehler
> I am unable to send frames larger than 9216 bytes (destination MAC through
> trailing CRC inclusive) using ixgbevf hardware with latest netmap code
> (
Does NS_MOREFRAG work when using netmap with network adaptors (e.g.
virtio_net)?
I need to send and receive large frames -- 9600 bytes -- but the netmap
buffer size is only 2048.
Joe Buehler
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd
Hi,
My name is Stephen Joseph, the Business Development Manager at one of the
leading email database providing companies.
Our area of expertise lies specifically in the major industrial lists like:
Agriculture, Business Services, Chambers of Commerce, Cities, Towns &
Municipali
llow for
remote connectivity in that scenario.
Does anyone know if this is known/expected behavior? If no one knows I'll
file a bug ticket on the scenario as it certainly doesn't seem kosher to me.
Thanks everyone,
-Joseph
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Ward [mailto:jbw...@hilltop
Hi,
I have built a firewall/routing box utilizing FreeBSD and need to mirror all
of the lan-side traffic before it is NATed to another box which will have
traffic analysis software running on it.
The firewall box has 4 interfaces: 3 wired (re0, re1, re2) and 1 wireless
(ath0).
re0 is the inter
Hopefully I'm posting to the right mailing list.
I couldn't suss out how one joins up to be able to submit patches to FreeBSD
so I'm posting here to point out my submitted patch to the Android code
base.
Their code is basically lifted straight from FreeBSD so the patch should
apply cleanly.
In a
The following reply was made to PR kern/124753; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Joseph Lee
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/124753: [ieee80211] net80211 discards power-save queue packets
early
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:34:11 -0700
Seems to be FINALLY noticed and fixed by
Hi all,
I have been hitting some barrier with FreeBSD 7.1 network performance. I
have written an application which contains two kernel threads that takes
mbufs directly from a network interface and forwards to another network
interface. This idea is to simulate different network environment.
I
The following reply was made to PR kern/124753; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Joseph Lee
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, nugun...@nugundam.best.vwh.net
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/124753: [ieee80211] net80211 discards power-save queue packets
early
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:12:16 -0800
ath0
ging logic just pushed the problem elsewhere it sounds like
>there's something else wrong which (as you note) probably requires a packet capture
to >understand. I'm pretty sure TIM is handled correctly in RELENG_7 but a packet
capture >would help
Hello.
We've recently written an extensive software system that uses SCTP as a
critical component. We've started to run into an issue where the box kenel
panics after throwing an error message from sctp_timer.c that says "Our list
is out of order? Out of order list". Can anyone here shed light
On Sunday 05 March 2006 12:02, Max Laier wrote:
> All,
>
> there have been a lot of problem reports with iwi(4) lately. Can everybody
> who does have problems with it please take a look at:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/new_iwi/
>
> There is a new version of the driver (converted to us
"jb" == "John Baldwin" said:
jb> We don't detect the local APIC via MSR's or the APIC bit in
jb> cpu_features, but rely on a working MP Table or MADT table
jb> to setup both the local APIC(s) and I/O APIC(s).
Unfortunately not having the APIC enabled in the BIOS also
means that we cannot use
> - Am I not following the correct procedures to
> allocate and deallocate memory in kernel space ??
> - Or is the problem elsewhere ??
You didn't say whether you've checked your code for buffer
overruns.
If the fault is happening in seemingly unrelated parts of
the kernel with your module is e
port8669
unregistered_only no
natd configuration in firewall:
--
/sbin/ipfw add 43 divert 8669 all from 169.254.0.18 to any via vr1
/sbin/ipfw add 46 divert 8668 all from any to any via vr0
Joseph.
___
[EMAIL PROT
crease. This is not the most secure way of doing it, but it
allows you to work with a firewall that isn't physically accessible. If you
don't expect the IP address to change, and are willing to reboot if it does,
you can increase the securelevel to 3.
Hope this helps,
Joseph
- Or
pendent parts of
the kernel, fixing all the warnings, translating all of the anti-DoS
code from TCP/IP into TP/CLNP It's not like we arbitrarily
decided that we didn't like OSI and just threw it out the window.
Joseph T. Klein
Senior Network Engineer/Peering Coordinator
Adelphia
What is involved?
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 04:28 PM, Garrett Wollman wrote:
< said:
On the other hand the NetBSD folks don't see it as dead weight
Are you volunteering to do all the work (or pay someone else to do
so)?
-GAWollman
--
Joseph T. Klein
Senior Network
adweight around.
-GAWollman
--
Joseph T. Klein
Senior Network Engineer/Peering Coordinator
Adelphia Backbone Team
PSTN: +1 414 628 3380 INOC-DBA: 19548*585
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
own netiso bits.
I can commit the patches if you will make them and once they will work
for you
(I think they will not hurt anyone).
/fjoe
--
Joseph T. Klein
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
an IS-IS shop, I am
hoping someone has worked on moving the ISO code into FreeBSD
so we will not be required to move our network monitoring systems
over to NetBSD or some version of Linux.
Clues, hints, comments,
--
Joseph T. Klein
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
To isolate drives from network, I usually use dd, faucet and hose to test
the network.
cd /usr/ports/net/netpipes
make install clean
on System A:
faucet 45363 --in dd if=/dev/stdin of=/dev/null bs=1k
on System B:
hose HostA 45363 --out dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/stdout bs=1k count=1m
Of course,
Hi,
Is there a utility that will allow me to inject an IP#/port# into a
hash (or similiar structure) table that the kernel can consult to
determine if it should drop an incoming connection? I am trying to
stop the new worm that is out there. I have about 8000 and growing
hosts that I need to blo
> > "etni"
>
> "inet"
>
Your string reversal function is buggy.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Sudish Joseph writes:
> The PR also contains the (gross, alpha-specific) hack I use right now
> to work around this issue. It simply masks out the upper 32 bits in
> the pointer when making the comparison. Obviously not a real
> solution, however it suffices for now since all of
t;< 32))
break;
}
return (hook);
--
Sudish Joseph
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
same 32-bit segment.
--
Sudish Joseph
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
This very much sounds like you need to learn IP subnetting. I highly
recommend the Cisco Press CCNA book. I can dig up ISBN number if you want.
There are very few cases that call for a subnet mask of 255.255.255.255.
You probably want 255.255.255.0
You can specify the subnetmask on the comman
With a Cisco or a FreeBSD box can do routing.
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Namba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "FreeBSD-ISP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 13:49
Subject: RE: router question
> Depe
It needs to goto something that can handle it like a Cisco router with
approiate WAN options or a FreeBSD box with an appropriate card (search the
mailing lists for info on those cards).
- Original Message -
From: "matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
C
Unless I am mistaken, ICMP source quench applies to any IP traffic, not just
TCP.
Also, ICMP source quench can be sent by intermediate routers.
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Pentchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 08:26
Subject: ICMP source
I've been trying to up my TCP window size from the default 16K and it's caused nothing
but problems. From the info I've found so far, these are the sysctl i've changed:
kern.ipc.maxsockbuffer=2097152
net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1
net.inet.tcp.sendspace=524288
net.inet.tcp.recvspace=524288
But if I do
Hi all,
I'm trying to get mozilla working with ipv6. I've read that the linux
mozilla is supposed to work with ipv6 by default. I tried installing the
FreeBSD port of mozilla+ipv6-M18 but it seg faults immediately. The
linux mozilla release .7 works with ipv4 under linux compatibility mode
but doe
Hi all,
I want to have a host use ipv6 to autoconfigure its interface, but then
add a couple ipv6 alias addresses to the same interface. The end goal is
to configure the interface with its autoconf address and some statically
assigned addresses.
Is it possible to do this using rc.conf settings? I
36 matches
Mail list logo
