On the other hand the NetBSD folks don't see it as dead weight
and systems that may need to talk with core routers that use
IS-IS end up on other platforms.

Perhaps this is why Arbor uses NetBSD.

On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 03:13  PM, Garrett Wollman wrote:

<<On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:40:58 -0600, "Joseph T. Klein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

Has anyone done work to incorporate the ISO networking code
into FreeBSD? This has been done for NetBSD. It is a required
component if one wishes to natively support ISO based protocols
such as IS-IS.
For the limited value that OSI protocols have today, it is a much
better use of resources to simply integrate the protocol stack into
the application.  IIRC, IS-IS runs directly on top of CLNP, so all of
the ISO-TP and TCP-over-CLNP stuff is irrelevant to it.

We chose a long time ago to drop support for OSI protocols because
the network stack was evolving significantly and nobody wanted to
carry that deadweight around.

-GAWollman



--
Joseph T. Klein
Senior Network Engineer/Peering Coordinator
Adelphia Backbone Team
PSTN: +1 414 628 3380   INOC-DBA: 19548*585


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Reply via email to