On the other hand the NetBSD folks don't see it as dead weight and systems that may need to talk with core routers that use IS-IS end up on other platforms.
Perhaps this is why Arbor uses NetBSD. On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 03:13 PM, Garrett Wollman wrote:
<<On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:40:58 -0600, "Joseph T. Klein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Has anyone done work to incorporate the ISO networking code into FreeBSD? This has been done for NetBSD. It is a required component if one wishes to natively support ISO based protocols such as IS-IS.For the limited value that OSI protocols have today, it is a much better use of resources to simply integrate the protocol stack into the application. IIRC, IS-IS runs directly on top of CLNP, so all of the ISO-TP and TCP-over-CLNP stuff is irrelevant to it. We chose a long time ago to drop support for OSI protocols because the network stack was evolving significantly and nobody wanted to carry that deadweight around. -GAWollman
-- Joseph T. Klein Senior Network Engineer/Peering Coordinator Adelphia Backbone Team PSTN: +1 414 628 3380 INOC-DBA: 19548*585 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message