s, so I renamed the flag "-s".
I created a Phabricator entry for the new patch:
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21880
This contains a sample output for local/internet sockets.
Let me know what you think.
Cheers,
[1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116643
--
Jeremi
, configurable with
+.Xr ip6addrctl 8 .
.It Cm -no_prefer_iface
Clear a flag
.Cm no_prefer_iface .
--
Jeremie Le Hen
Scientists say the world is made up of Protons, Neutrons and Electrons.
They forgot to mention Morons.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org
ust did a wild try, can you check if it works?
http://people.freebsd.org/~jlh/dlink_dfe520.diff
--
Jeremie Le Hen
Scientists say the world is made up of Protons, Neutrons and Electrons.
They forgot to mention Morons.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
Eugene
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 01:12:01PM +0600, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09.06.2012 23:07, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > What it usually done for convenience is to create a gif(4) or gre(4)
> > tunnel to another network, which is then encrypted using IPSec
&g
port
mode. The inner IP/GRE header is considered as the payload and it is
encrypted. The benefit of this approach is that you "see" your tunnel,
it looks more natural from a system point of view.
I haven't used IPSec in tunnel mode
ed or not.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
Humans are born free and equal. But some are more equal than others.
Coluche
Index: fstat.1
===
RCS file: /mnt/repos/freebsd-cvsroot/src/usr.bin/
The following reply was made to PR bin/116643; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jeremie Le Hen
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc: b...@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, jere...@le-hen.org
Subject: Re: bin/116643: [patch] [request] fstat(1): add INET/INET6 socket
details as in NetBSD and
ges anyway.
I don't mean to hurry you, it's just for the sake of my curiosity :).
Thanks.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:18:03AM +, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > In summary, favor wired connectivity over the wireless one, at any time:
> > could this be at boot time or not.
> >
> > I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who
'm not the only one who wants this kind of setup. So
how did you achieve this setup?
Thank you.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
are doing and to show that FreeBSD is far behind and is losing
> it's lustre on continuing to be the networking platform of choice.
A very good paper worth reading about all this by Paul Willmann, Scott
Rixner and Alan Cox:
An Evaluation of Network Stack Parallelism Strategies in Modern
Opera
Matus,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:21:04AM +0100, Matus Harvan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 09:04:11PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > I can think of a possible implementation of mtund(8) without kernel
> > patching. The next pf(4) import from OpenBSD will likely allow to
fect TCP slow start or have some
other minor drawbacks. But hey, we're talking about bypassing firewall
:-)...
My 2 cents.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi Alfred,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 10:40:05PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Jeremie Le Hen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070615 01:07] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It appears nearly impossible to firewall a NFS server on FreeBSD.
>
> I would be nearly impossible if one d
other than "no one has needed this yet" why this
option is not available for nfsd(8), rpc.lockd(8) and rpc.statd(8)?
Best regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@fr
tion).
Do you have any idea what those features will become in later days ?
Thank you.
Best regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
function: old2new_knobs()
This is neat. What about issuing a warning in order to make a
quicker transition ?
Again, thank you for working on this.
Best regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
fr
network adapter to narrow the possible sources of the problem.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
09:14:57.593729 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 27791, offset 0, flags [DF], proto:
TCP (6), length: 64) 192.168.1.3.56556 > 192.168.1.1.8
know as well.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
gh UP/DOWN
cycles to trigger it, but it might be worth trying it.
Note that he has insisted that this is a *hack*.
The patch is attached. Please let us know if it makes things
better.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
Index: if_iwi.c
=
ou would want to do that if you control it
> from the "host" system anyway...
Additionally, ipfw(8) has the "jail" keyword, though it is easier to
work with IP addresses since jail ids are bumped whenever you restart
a jail.
Regards,
--
Jeremi
e by default). This would mean it is eight time
easier to exhaust kernel memory. In this case, how one could prevent
his box from being a potential victim of this ?
Thank you.
Best regards
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< t
e this so far.
I've Cc'ed Andrew Thompson which has imported if_bridge(4) from
OpenBSD into FreeBSD. He will likely be able to answer your question
and tell whether it is possible to bridge two VLAN interfaces
(attached to a physical interface) with another physical interface.
Regards,
-
Raymond,
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 06:01:03PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 02:12:47AM -0400, Raymond Wagner wrote:
> > My ISP provides me up to 5 dynamically assigned addresses out of a /20
> > block. I have more than 5 machines on my network, so I hav
mations.
(See http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/ebtables-man.html)
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
debugging purposes and MUST NEVER be used in production.
% */
% path = getenv("NSSWITCH_CONF");
% if (path == NULL)
% #endif
% path = _PATH_NS_CONF;
We should remove this #if clause because of your argument. I'm not sure
it is worth documenting it however.
Reg
% #if defined(_NSS_DEBUG) && defined(_NSS_SHOOT_FOOT)
% /* NOTE WELL: THIS IS A SECURITY HOLE. This must only be built
% * for debugging purposes and MUST NEVER be used in production.
% */
% path = getenv("NSSWITCH_CONF");
% if (path == NULL)
% #en
a packet filter might suffice...
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Anndrew,
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 08:45:54PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 8/21/06, Jeremie Le Hen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >As is has indeed already been stated in this thread, IPSec tunnel mode
> >shunts the routing table. However the new enc(4) interface that A
h if_bridge(4). I Cc'ed him for clarification.
I hope this mail will serve future generations :-).
Best regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
provided it so far [1].
[1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-May/010563.html
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi, Robert,
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:54:21PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>
> >> PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND
> >> 60 root 1 -44 -163 0K 8K WAIT 355.6H 72.
his very interesting thread. What
solution did you finally employ to circumvent your high interrupt
load ?
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
but since we can't patch Windows, this patch helps
> alleviate the problem from the other side.
Thank you for fixing this ! I have been puzzled for month with this.
I hope to see it commited soon.
Best regards.
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile
but racoon/ipsec-tools isn't aware
> of it. The ideal would be to have the possibility of dynamically
> creating tun(4) devices representing the tunnel endpoints, if required,
> when phase2 has been established.
Best regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-
you can know from
which tunnel the packet came from when you have multiple tunnels.
As Brian pointed out, FreeBSD indeed lacks the enc(4) interface which
lives in OpenBSD. enc(4) is a kind of hook into the tunnel mode
providing a natural interface to it.
Best regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremi
e.net/~neelnatu/alpine4linux/.
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to exist any more. Please, if you
find something more useful, follow it up to this thread, it could be
interesting for other users.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org &g
has taken care of this yet.
Best regards,
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance/2005-November/001654.html
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://l
seems to have useful and concrete applications for providers.
Best regards,
[1] http://www.sjdjweis.com/linux/proxyarp/
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
t; http://people.freebsd.org/~julian/layer2c.pdf
>
> but it's probably not of general interest.
Many thanks, this is _very_ instructive.
Best regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
_
use pf.
It is described here :
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2005-July/007899.html
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
bw 128Kbit/s queue 10KBytes
>
> And my test speed from ip 192.168.0.5 is:
> Down 123.66kbps
> Up 766.24kbps
What's the output of
% ipfw show 600 601
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
__
will check the NIC state upon each soft clock
interrupt (HZ) and fetch them into the memory if any. If too much
packets were received during a period, then the overflow of packets
will be discarded, incrementing the "Receive No Buffers" error count.
I think you can
e use.
In other words, I think the feature you're calling for is really
specific to your problem, regarding your current network environnement.
The misbehaviour of some particular network-fascist ISP should not
reach the FreeBSD source tree.
Best regards,
--
J
ated" rule is obviously : /(a.b.c)
With your ruleset may be summed up as : /a+/b+/c
Which is the same as the "negated" rule in regard to De Morgan's theorem.
Do you agree with this ?
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
t; > the 'wrong' interface will gladly be accepted, too. This broke things
> > > for me, because I didn't want to have that certain IP-address accessible.
This behaviour can be controlled with :
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf//rp_filter
These sysctl are explaine
but scared about adding such options because there
would be no reason then to not add other syntactic facilities, which
would end up messing the whole syntax.
Best regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
_
Hi Mike,
> And what is the point of all of this when we have OpenBSD's PF? ipfw and
> libalias is dead.
In addition to what others said, you should look at the following,
this may be an answer :
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/2005-July/001934.html
Regards,
--
Jer
s Etherchannel.
For the sake of completeness, I would add that OpenBSD has the trunk(4)
interface which allows to bond multiple network interfaces with
configurable trunk protocols.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=trunk&sektion=4&arch=i386&apropos=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Cur
lticast bit of 802.11? No, its the LSB of the first octet.
> So your outgoing pings are actually multicasts.
Good catch ! :-)
[1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/2005-July/001934.html
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
being used for ?
If you're still having error after switching interfaces, maybe it's
time to check your cable.
Finally, what are you running ?
[ ] RELENG_4
[ ] RELENG_5
[ ] RELENG_6
[ ] CURRENT
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org
played with this), but I'm a little bit scared about
the administrative overhead this would introduce for managing jails.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing lis
SD to be able to do this.
> It's hard to describe this textually to its full extent. That's why
> my upcoming paper will have mostly graphics depicting the packet flow
> and the processing options.
I'm in haste to read your paper.
[1] http://www.manpage.org/cgi-bin/man/man2
The interface(s) the default route(s) point to are mem-
bers of the egress interface group.
%%%
This article [1] explains better what interface groups are, see the
"Interface group" section (according to w3m: line 182/422 (43%))
[1] http://ker
F but is far less intrusive
> to the kernel.
By "interface groups", do you mean the same ones as OpenBSD ?
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mai
I get the following error:
>
> # ifconfig carp0 create
> ifconfig: SIOCIFCREATE: Invalid argument
> #
Add "device carp" to you kernel configuration file and recompile.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
tcp from any 22 to any iptos lowdelay
DNS requests: udp from any to any 53
Small PONG: icmp from any to any icmptype 8 iplen 1-200
HTTP(S), FTP: tcp from any to any 21,80,443
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile d
Hi Philip,
> Yepps. And adding bridged does not help either.
> I'm beginning to belive that I am the problem since there must be other
> people doing this.
did you resolve your problem ? If yes, what was the solution ?
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org
1500 xl0
192.168.4.54/32link#1 UC 00 1500 xl0
192.168.4.80 00:60:08:60:fe:10 UHLW024577 1500
lo0 =>
192.168.4.80/32link#1 UC 00 1500 xl0
%%%
Thank you.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le H
also tried to connect to Comp3, but the behaviour is the same.
Thus my guess is that Gate2 (RELENG_5) is sending bad ICMP need-to-frag
packets, while Gate1 (RELENG_4) is sending good ones, because all Comp*
are RELENG_5, and don't behavie in the same way.
Does anyone have an idea why Path MT
ecv and xmit without success..
Did you try something like this (assuming 192.168.1.1 is on xl0 side, fxp0
is the other interface) :
ipfw add pipe 1 any from 192.168.1.1 to any bridged out recv xl0 xmit fxp0
ipfw add pipe 2 any from any to 192.168.1.1 bridged out recv fxp0 xmit xl0
Regards,
--
Je
t ? If so, it would be worth if you could submit a
port of the older release of ntop.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
|
> packet data <---/
> ...
> [end of mbuf]
I think I understand what you are proposing here, but what do you have
in mind that would require such a system ? If there is no really good
reason, I think it is wise to keep it sim
sure this would make Netgraph
> >people react a bit ;-).
>
> why?
> I think they are orthogonal.
I was just kidding, because new features sometimes trigger a netgraph
praise saying it is already possible with this framework. But this
worthless.
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jere
'm pretty sure this would make Netgraph
people react a bit ;-).
> pf does something along these lines in case you are looking for references.
Would it be possible to share this tag among pf and ipfw ?
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at
ck of multiple routing tables support, lack
of source routing (as well as higher level protocol based routing).
Are there actually some projects that are being worked on to overcome
this ?
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> Yes it might be a good idea, but again, it depends on your security
> requirements : any user is able to bind port 8000, so if you have
> other users on the system, this may not be something to avoid.
s/not//
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz
n your security
requirements : any user is able to bind port 8000, so if you have
other users on the system, this may not be something to avoid.
But FWIW, this would totally remove the need to make a privileged part
in your application.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie a
t lately and you want security.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ust for information, does this principle requires FreeBSD to keep
existing option forever, or are there some scarce situations where
some superfluous options could be deleted ?
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
_
t for a
"pipe" action.
However, the main problem with this approach is that it breaks POLA.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
,
[1] http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/vimage/
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
topics please,
I'm very interested in them.
Thanks.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
T
archives.
Regards,
[1] http://hashbang.org.uk/index.php/GIF_to_IPIP_Tunnels
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ore longer, depending on the value of the
five first bits of the GRE header.
Enjoy your tunnel ;-).
[1] http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/protocol/gre.htm
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-
Read above. Usually gre(4) tunnels are used as simple IP-over-IP tunnel,
so a gif(4) would do the same with less overload (due to GRE header size).
GRE seems far more powerful, but I don't know its benefits.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile d
- encapsulated packet comes in from 203.16.215.227 with data from IP
> 192.83.231.16 for 192.109.197.145. It should go out xl0.
> - It doesn't. No further indication of why not.
I saw your commit on gif(4) manual page precising that gif(4) does not
do GRE tunnels. Does it represent a solu
e. I've tried
> > different systems, one and two NICs, 4.x and 5.x, all with the same
> > (non)result. What am I missing?
It would be worth knowing if the ICMP packet goes out from your
``internal'' interface (xl0). In this case, you should also see
the ICMP echo-
ostly impossible as the iwi(4) should be using the new
Sam Leffler's net80211 framework which is not going to be MFC'd to
RELENG_5. I believe you should definitely try -CURRENT.
Best regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
does SSH use IPSec AH ?" ? I've never heard of
such a thing. I think the code you pasted refers to IPSec transport
mode, but I'm afraid that it's not related to my problem of Path MTU
Discovery not working.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz a
5.4-STABLE #10: Fri Apr 29 10:39:24
As far as I can tell, this driver is not longer updated, the developpement
is done in BSD source trees (look at the file modification date).
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
from the Ethernet network card
on the RELENG_4 router.
Best regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ke the ssh session
with ~. .
Advices are welcome :-).
Thanks.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
21:36:32.956062 192.168.4.205.49583 > 192.168.1.222.2: S [tcp sum ok]
894016321:894016321(0) win 65535 (DF) (ttl 62, id 20835
and why I can't get the associated status.
Note that the shown MAC address is the correct one, thus the card seems
to receive some beacon frames, it's not a ``link'' error.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
_
it is not possible to export two directories from the
same filesystem with different options or credentials ? I didn't see
anything like this in the manpage. What did I miss ?
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org ><
> my current exports(5) file looks something like this :
> I copied the last line and replaced the path with /usr/ports, when I try to
> reload mountd(8), I get an error in /var/log/messages :
This is a draft, and shouldn't appear in the previous mail.
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jere
ed mountd(8) sources, and this error messages appears when the
mount(2) syscall fails (I assume this is the way mountd(8) informs the
kernel about a directory to be exported).
I'm sure this is a foolish error from me, but I can't figure one.
Thanks.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jerem
jor
drawback in your situation (portable software) is that kqueue(2) only
exists in BSD world, not in Linux.
Best regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org ma
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 12:05:11PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > Take a look at PRs 61685 and 76539. Hope that helps.
>
> Well, I was aware of the first one (I'm doing shaping on my internal
> interface as a workaround), but not the second one. The second one
> is
. Unfortunately this patch seems to be
based on rev 1.21 of NetBSD's if_bridge.c, this is a little bit old.
Best regards,
[1] http://mu.org/~mux/patches/pf.patch
[2] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-April/025886.html
--
Jeremie Le Hen
<
ch for one of the firewall
avaiable in FreeBSD.
Best regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
help for. A manually parse will be
needed, although he succeeds in re-using the Ethereal plug'in, but I
don't know if it is feasible.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
jeremie at le-hen dot org
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
ing overhead
for each packet especially using gigabit Ethernet.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
jeremie at le-hen dot org
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
hink there must be some as they would have been merged if this was
not the case.
Are there any change to have this fixed in RELENG_4 ? I know that no
more releases are scheduled in this branch, but there is no obvious
reason to let a bug live there IMHO.
--
Jeremie Le He
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 02:05:12AM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 01:20:34AM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > > I'll give a try to a 4.10 kernel ASAP.
> >
> > I compiled the lastest kernel from RELENG_4_10 CVS branch and DUMMYNET
> > pipe
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 01:20:34AM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > I'll give a try to a 4.10 kernel ASAP.
>
> I compiled the lastest kernel from RELENG_4_10 CVS branch and DUMMYNET
> pipes works well. I am able to use one pipe on my external interface
> egress witho
h to test
the same configuration but I'm pretty sure it won't work.
Any ideas of what could break this ?
--
Jeremie Le Hen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubs
ot involved in
DUMMYNET, as they are in ALTQ for example).
I can still use pipes on interface ingress, internal interface egress,
but it fails when I use a pipe on egress on my external interface _for
packet being forwarded and NATed only_. Weirdly I am still able to
use a TCP stream from the ro
1.26.2.14) is the culprit.
Best regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ything?
I think it has just been commited in -CURRENT. See revs 1.58, 1.59 and
1.60. In fact this is a small workaround until there is a working
solution proposed, if I understood correctly.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-net@f
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
