uilding it in kernel.
>
> Resuming I only need to add:
>
> options TCPHPTS
>
> Is this correct?
>
Yeah, that will probably fix it. According to a comment in
/usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_hpts.c it adds a high precision timer
system for tcp, used by RACK and BBR.
--
Gary Jennejohn
rs.
>
> I will add missing config to GENERIC and see how it goes.
>
All the required information is here:
https://freebsdfoundation.org/our-work/journal/browser-based-edition/rack-and-alternate-tcp-stacks-for-freebsd/
--
Gary Jennejohn
#x27;t support RACK.
These entries are missing in GENERIC:
makeoptions WITH_EXTRA_TCP_STACKS=1
options TCPHPTS
options TCP_RACK
--
Gary Jennejohn
most of it will not even be able to run FBSD 13.
>
> There are no 100M ed variants. There are some PC Card variants that have
> 100M MII connections, but they are limited to about 12Mbps due to bus
> limits. Even the PCI ones didn't have 100M mii connections.
>
--
Gary Jenn
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:46:52 -0500 (EST)
Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:06:39 -0800
> > Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:40 AM, Konstantin Belousov
> >> wrote:
>
> We should move away from this for new code.
>
Really? I personally find having all variables grouped together
much easier to understand. Stumbling across declarations in the
middle of the code in a for-loop, for example, takes me by surprise.
I also greatly dislike initializi
n (ret);
> > + }
> > +
This seems wrong. rcvd is initialized to 1 so that the check for
rcvd != 0 can never be false. We already successfully called
__sys_recvmsg() just above the loop, so why not simplify the
code by doing
if (ret == -1)
return (rcvd
ignored and ping from a different
machine shows no reaction, so I'd say the kernel is pretty much wedged.
For now I'm setting net.inet.tcp.loopfuse=0 in /etc/sysctl.conf.
--
Gary Jennejohn
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://l
k about it first.
>
> http://sobomax.sippysoft.com/IFQ_MAXLEN.diff
>
Seems like a good idea, although I don't see where ifqmaxlen is being
initialized.
--
Gary Jennejohn
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
On Sat, 01 May 2010 02:11:04 -0700
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:23:13 -0700
> > Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Many network drivers in the FreeBSD kernel use the IFQ_MAXLEN value to
&g
10 matches
Mail list logo
