On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 07:06:34 +0200
Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com> wrote:

[delete irrelevant parts of the patch]

> > +   rcvd = 1;
> > +   for (i = rcvd; i < vlen; i++) {  
> i = rcvd = 1; ... i++, rcvd++ ?
> 
> > +           ret = __sys_recvmsg(s, &msgvec[i].msg_hdr, flags);
> > +           if (ret == -1) {
> > +                   if (rcvd != 0) {
> > +                           /* We've received messages. Let caller know. */

> > +                           return (rcvd);
> > +                   }
> > +                   return (ret);
> > +           }
> > +

This seems wrong.  rcvd is initialized to 1 so that the check for
rcvd != 0 can never be false.  We already successfully called
__sys_recvmsg() just above the loop, so why not simplify the
code by doing

        if (ret == -1)
                return (rcvd);

-- 
Gary Jennejohn (gj@)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to