On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 07:06:34 +0200 Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com> wrote:
[delete irrelevant parts of the patch] > > + rcvd = 1; > > + for (i = rcvd; i < vlen; i++) { > i = rcvd = 1; ... i++, rcvd++ ? > > > + ret = __sys_recvmsg(s, &msgvec[i].msg_hdr, flags); > > + if (ret == -1) { > > + if (rcvd != 0) { > > + /* We've received messages. Let caller know. */ > > + return (rcvd); > > + } > > + return (ret); > > + } > > + This seems wrong. rcvd is initialized to 1 so that the check for rcvd != 0 can never be false. We already successfully called __sys_recvmsg() just above the loop, so why not simplify the code by doing if (ret == -1) return (rcvd); -- Gary Jennejohn (gj@) _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"