> On Sep 3, 2015, at 13:18, Jeff Meegan wrote:
>
> According to their EULA, it is BSD licensed.
>
> http://www.mellanox.com/page/mlnx_ofed_eula?mtag=linux_sw_drivers
Yes, but the 9.1 version wasn't strictly from Mellanox..
I don't know if I'd use the pre-Mellanox version though, tbh.
Thanks,
://github.com/gvnn3/conductor
>>
>>
> Cool! The architecture you have is similar to that of the SPECsfs
> benchmark test ( http://www.spec.org/sfs2008/ )
> which involves a "coordinator node" and multiple "client nodes" which
> direct NFS network
> traffic t
> On Jul 5, 2014, at 20:04, "George Neville-Neil" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've coded up a system to allow you to control multiple other systems for use
> in testing.
>
> https://github.com/gvnn3/conductor
>
> It's BSD licensed, of course, and is only alpha quality but I'm using it in
> the test
On Jun 9, 2013, at 5:35 AM, Alex Liptsin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I work with FreeBSD9.1 and Mellanox devices.
> Every time I unload / load mlx4ib module, NIC names of mellanox devices (ibX)
> are renamed.
> Can I prevent it?
>
> [root@h-qa-032 mlx4]# ifconfig
> ib8: flags=8002 metric 0 mtu 65520
>
On Jun 5, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Alex Liptsin wrote:
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Alex L.
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 5 ביונ 2013, at 18:13, "John Baldwin"
> mailto:j...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 5:18:46 am Alex Liptsin wrote:
> I commented on that lines, because I want to c
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Alex Liptsin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I use FreeBSD 9.1 with OFED compiled on it.
>
> There is a Mellanox adapter:
>
> [root@qa-h-vrt-030-006 ~]# pciconf -lv |grep mlx4 -A 3
> mlx4_core0@pci0:0:5:0: class=0x028000 card=0x005015b3 chip=0x100315b3
> rev=0x00 hdr=0x00
>
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Xin Li wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 05/07/13 15:03, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> Saw the following LOR on a CURRENT build as of yesterday with an
>> almost idle machine processing ARP request
Saw the following LOR on a CURRENT build as of yesterday with an
almost idle machine processing ARP requests:
root@wf220:/mnt # taskqueue_drain with the following non-sleepable locks held:
exclusive rw lle (lle) r = 0 (0xfe001450b410) locked @
/usr/src/sys/netinet/in.c:1484
KDB: stack backt
Unfortunately I don't have swap setup on this machine (not sure
why... I'll remedy that soon). Basically I was tcpdump'ing the
interface that was doing intense NFS I/O at the same time, and I ran
into this crash with cxgbe+lagg. Sources are a bit stale (~1.5 months
old).
Thanks,
-Garrett
PS Pl
On Jan 18, 2013, at 6:12 AM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 18:10 +0530, Venkat Duvvuru wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have to submit some patches for Emulex's "oce" driver. Could you please
>> let me know if http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html is the correct way of
>> submitting them?
>>
>> /Ve
On Jan 8, 2013, at 7:50 AM, Barney Cordoba wrote:
> --- On Mon, 1/7/13, Erich Dollansky wrote:
>
>> From: Erich Dollansky
>> Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP
>> To: "Barney Cordoba"
>> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
>> Date: Monday, January 7, 2013, 10:56 PM
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 18:2
On Jan 7, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Barney Cordoba wrote:
> I have a situation where I have to run 9.1 on an old single core box. Does
> anyone have a handle on whether it's better to build a non SMP kernel or to
> just use a standard SMP build with just the one core? Thanks.
Non-SMP. I don't s
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Barney Cordoba
wrote:
...
> Has anyone done an analysis on modern hardware as to whether udp csum
> offloading is actually beneficial? Even on 2007 hardware I came to the
> conclusion that using offloading was a negative.
>
> Reminds me of the days when people we
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Yuri wrote:
>> I tried many SOCKS4 proxies from
>> http://sockslist.net/proxy/server-socks-hide-ip-address and mostly I am
>> getting this error:
>> Error 120 (net::ERR_SOCKS_
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Yuri wrote:
> I tried many SOCKS4 proxies from
> http://sockslist.net/proxy/server-socks-hide-ip-address and mostly I am
> getting this error:
> Error 120 (net::ERR_SOCKS_CONNECTION_FAILED): Unknown error.
> Only one of them succeeded.
> SOCKS5 however works ok.
>
(clipping off mdf and adrian so they don't get directly spammed :)..)
Crud. Continuing the processor after panic didn't work, so it
might be a case of cxgbe "shot the sheriff" or something else in the
stack is doing something wonky:
db> c
Memory modified after free 0xff8000405000(9216) va
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:18 PM, wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>> 9216 sounds like a jumbo frame mbuf. So the NIC is writing to an mbuf
>>> after it's finalised/fre
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:18 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> 9216 sounds like a jumbo frame mbuf. So the NIC is writing to an mbuf
>> after it's finalised/freed.
>>
>> I have a similar bug showing up on ath(4) RX. :(
>
> Compile with DEBUG_MEMGUARD in the ker
(Don't know why I hit reply instead of reply-all, but oh well... I had
one more reply anyhow)
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Kevin Lo wrote:
>>> Author:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Kevin Lo wrote:
> Author: kevlo
> Date: Fri Dec 7 02:22:48 2012
> New Revision: 243965
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/243965
>
> Log:
> - according to POSIX, make socket(2) return EAFNOSUPPORT rather than
> EPROTONOSUPPORT if the address fami
Hi,
Seeing the following LOR on CURRENT when scping files over two L3
lagged ixgbe interfaces:
lock order reversal:
1st 0xfe000d15a118 ix0:rx(1) (ix0:rx(1)) @
/usr/src/sys/modules/ixgbe/../../dev/ixgbe/ixgbe.c:4353
2nd 0xfe01334ada08 if_lagg rwlock (if_lagg rwlock) @
/usr/src/sys/mod
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 10 December 2012 15:18, wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>> 9216 sounds like a jumbo frame mbuf. So the NIC is writing to an mbuf
>>> after it's finalised/freed.
>>>
>>> I have a similar bug showing up on a
I noticed this while checking the logs on one of my test boxes
after restarting the network. Any idea where I should start looking
into this (has IPv6 enabled but wasn't using it, em/cxgbe/ixgbe
interfaces with the ixgbe interfaces lagged previously, but now not)?
It looks suspiciously like the
The following reply was made to PR kern/174311; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Garrett Cooper
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, yaneg...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/174311: [em][lagg] Can't create lagg on recent CURRENT
(2012.12.05)
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:20:34 -0800
Please
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 12:49:18PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> G> I can't se
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 12:49:18PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> G> I can't seem to create a lagg'ed interface on HEAD with ixgbe
>> G>
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 12:49:18PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> G> I can't seem to create a lagg'ed interface on HEAD with ixgbe
> G> (it's failing when creating a cloned interface), whereas creating it
&
I can't seem to create a lagg'ed interface on HEAD with ixgbe
(it's failing when creating a cloned interface), whereas creating it
on 9.1-STABLE built from a couple weeks ago just worked. Ideas?
Thanks,
-Garrett
# cat /root/ISI-GENERIC
include GENERIC
ident ISI-GENERIC
makeo
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
> I got the previous one but was busy. This one seems to only add freebsd-net
> to the Cc list
>
>>>> It woul
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Garrett Cooper wrote:
As noted in a previous thread, I set out to better document the
net.inet6 sysctls after having to tweak the knobs to get things to work
for TAHI, and this is the
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Garrett Cooper wrote:
As noted in a previous thread, I set out to better document the
net.inet6 sysctls after having to tweak the knobs to get things to work for
TAHI, and this is the resulting draft (so far). I also took the
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
>> As noted in a previous thread, I set out to better document the
>> net.inet6 sysctls after having to tweak the knobs to get things to work for
>> TAHI, and this is
Hi all,
As noted in a previous thread, I set out to better document the
net.inet6 sysctls after having to tweak the knobs to get things to work
for TAHI, and this is the resulting draft (so far). I also took the
liberty of removing the ip6_rr_prune and icmp6_redirtimeout sysctls
because they
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> On 21 November 2012 22:39, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> While going through the tree trying to document all of our
>> net.inet6 sysctls, I noticed that net.inet6.ip6.rr_prune is defined,
>> but not actually used
While going through the tree trying to document all of our
net.inet6 sysctls, I noticed that net.inet6.ip6.rr_prune is defined,
but not actually used anywhere in the stack:
netinet6/ip6_var.h:VNET_DECLARE(int, ip6_rr_prune); /* router
renumbering prefix
netinet6/ip6_var.h:#define V_ip6_rr_p
Hi,
I've been TAHI testing FreeBSD 7.x sources for the past couple
months and over the course of my testing via the TAHI IPv6 conformance
test, I changed the knob value from net.inet6.icmp6.nd6_useloopback=1
-> net.inet6.icmp6.nd6_useloopback=0 and ran into a slew of errors
with the addr.p2 pha
Hi all,
With the help of postmaster, a new Infiniband list has been created for
FreeBSD. If you are interested in IB on FreeBSD, please subscribe to the
list. My group (Isilon) will be providing more details about the porting
effort being done from our end to the latest 1.5.x and the group is w
On Oct 30, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Tom Judge wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 30/10/2012 12:12, Adam McDougall wrote:
>> On 10/30/12 11:23, Tom Judge wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am trying to get if_lagg working in an HP b
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:11 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
...
> In this case, if using if_start() helps, then I'd like Garrett to try
> my current ixgbe patch from the other thread as well to reduce concurrent
> RX processing.
Sounds good. I'll let you guys know when I have everything setup aga
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Doing some poking around at the ixgb driver with a card I have at
>> $work using netperf and two machines hooked up over crossover, I
>> discovered that while ixgb's throughp
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
...
>>> Doing some poking around at the ixgb driver with a card I have at
>>> $work using netperf and two machines hooked up over crossover, I
>>> discovered that while ixgb's throughput performance was fantastic on
>>> 7.3/7.4, thoughput p
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Doing some poking around at the ixgb driver with a card I have at
> $work using netperf and two machines hooked up over crossover, I
> discovered that while ixgb's throughput performance was fantastic on
Hi,
Doing some poking around at the ixgb driver with a card I have at
$work using netperf and two machines hooked up over crossover, I
discovered that while ixgb's throughput performance was fantastic on
7.3/7.4, thoughput performance of the card is degraded on 8.2/9.0/9.1
by ~30% (9400Mbps on 7.4
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> ... don't suppose you want to throw this into a test case somewhere in the
> tree?
>
> The new ATF import would be ideal for this. :)
Indeed. The only problem is that bsd.test.mk is missing so you
can't really integrate testcases into t
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
>> I have just updated by 9.0-something laptop to 10.0-CURRENT r240948
>> and it very quickly panics after enabling network with IPsec
>> (I am using IPsec w/racoon for IPv4 ove
On Sep 25, 2012, at 12:38 AM, "Rudy (bulk)" wrote:
> On 9/24/12 11:52 PM, Hooman Fazaeli wrote:
>> sysctl dev.em.1
>
> From the side having the 'No buffer space available' (FreeBSD 8.3 Sep 13
> 2012)
>
> # sysctl dev.em.1
> dev.em.1.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.3.2
> dev.em.
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Rudy (bulk) wrote:
> On 9/24/12 5:01 PM, Ryan Stone wrote:
>>
>> Can you get the output of netstat -I emX -d?
>
> ...
>
>>
>> I suspect that you are seeing the em TX queue fill up. If so you
>> should see output drops reported by the em interface.
>>
> I do see 20
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Вадим Уразаев wrote:
> I am using two lagg interfaces :
> lagg0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
> options=400b8
> ether 00:1b:21:55:a7:c4
> nd6 options=9
> media: Ethernet autoselect
> status: active
> laggproto lacp
> laggport: igb1 flags=1c
> laggport: igb0 flags=
Hi -net!
I've been doing some IPv6 testing lately, and one of the issues
that I've run into in the past (since at least 7.0-CURRENT) is that if
I do `service netif restart `, e.g. `service netif restart`
multiple times, and have addresses statically configured in rc.conf,
more often than not th
The following reply was made to PR kern/170713; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Garrett Cooper
To: Navdeep Parhar
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/170713: [cxgb] Driver must be loaded after boot due to
timing issues checking for kern.ipc.nmb* values set via /boot/loader.conf
The following reply was made to PR bin/137641; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Garrett Cooper
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, vladimir.shebalden...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: bin/137641: ifconfig(8): various problems with
"vlan_device.vlan_id" syntax
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:53:55
The following reply was made to PR bin/137641; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Garrett Cooper
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, vladimir.shebalden...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: bin/137641: ifconfig(8): various problems with
"vlan_device.vlan_id" syntax
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:0
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
>> input.
>> Moreover, ifconfig em0 some_valid_fqdn/MASK silently ignores it, so you
>> can't set valid CIDR address using this notation.
>>
>> Classful era has ended more than 10 years ago, do we still want to keep
>> this behavior?
>>
> wer
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 10/22/11 19:49, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
The panic message says:
panic: tcp_input negative window: tp 0xfe007763e000 rcv_nxt
3718269252 rcv_adv 3718268291
I only have picture of the backtrace:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/mis
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
The panic message says:
panic: tcp_input negative window: tp 0xfe007763e000 rcv_nxt
3718269252 rcv_adv 3718268291
I only have picture of the backtrace:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/misc/panic_negative_window.jpg
I've see
Hi,
I've periodically seen the following LOR when trying to repro a
panic after restarting my network configuration:
:lock order reversal:
1st 0xc4142f1c rtentry (rtentry) @ /usr/src/sys/net/routec:362
2nd 0xc3d08604 if_afdata (if_afdata) @ /usr/src/sys/netinet6/scope6.c:417
KDB: stack backt
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> I see this comment, and I've found references to a
> net.inet.tcp.slowhz in Free, Net, and OpenBSDs, but this value can't
> be queried anymore.
>
> # grep -r slowhz /sys/
> /sys/netinet/ip.h:#def
I see this comment, and I've found references to a
net.inet.tcp.slowhz in Free, Net, and OpenBSDs, but this value can't
be queried anymore.
# grep -r slowhz /sys/
/sys/netinet/ip.h:#define IPFRAGTTL 60 /* time to live
for frags, slowhz */
Could someone please con
Hello,
I did some poking around tcpdump for work today, and while doing
that I ran into this item...
$ sysctl net.bpf
net.bpf.zerocopy_enable: 0
net.bpf.maxinsns: 512
net.bpf.maxbufsize: 524288
net.bpf.bufsize: 4096
Before I start tcpdump:
$ vmstat -m | grep BPF
BPF2612
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 4/4/11 4:35 PM, David Somayajulu wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>> Is there some way I can setup a running FreeBSD - (I use PCBSD7.2) - to
>> break into kgdb when the system panics. I am trying to get a stack trace
>> when "Fatal trap 12: page faul
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Attilio Rao wrote:
>
>>> No, what I'm saying is: UMA needs to not call its drain handlers, and
>>> ideally not call into VM to fill slabs, from the dumping context. That's
>>> easy to implement and will cause the dump to
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Jul 2010, Ian Smith wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm experiencing a deterministic situation on a development box I
> > > manage when I do
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Aleksandr A Babaylov <@babolo.ru> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 04:54:47PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 07:00:53PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Aleksandr A Babaylov <@babolo.ru> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 04:54:47PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 07:00:53PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > Just an observation I made while tran
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 07:00:53PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >> Just
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 07:00:53PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Just an observation I made while transferring a file:
>>
>> # time scp floppy.img somehost:
>> Password:
>> floppy.img
Hi,
Just an observation I made while transferring a file:
# time scp floppy.img somehost:
Password:
floppy.img100% 1440KB 13.7KB/s 01:45
real1m59.400s
user0m0.031s
sys 0m0.028s
# sysctl net.inet.tcp.tso=0
net.inet.tcp.tso: 1 -> 0
# time scp f
Hi,
I'm experiencing a deterministic situation on a development box I
manage when I do the following to enable ipfw and natd to bridge a
network with two bce(4) enabled NICs, where if I do the following
steps below, then try to push a few tcp frames through, the kernel
either hardlocks, or pani
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I am not sure the right forum to ask this question - is there any effort done
> to find portable code between different OSes, particularly freebsd and linux?
> Specifically, the networking layer could be portable between the
The following reply was made to PR kern/144680; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Garrett Cooper
To: Pavel Argentov
Cc: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/144680: em(4) problem with dual-port adapter
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:13:47 -0800
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Pavel
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
> I think setting it to a value of 0 has two good points...
>
> In code that does:
> if (XXX & RTF_LLINFO) {
>yyy()
> }
> the optimiser should simply remove the code,
>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Li, Qing wrote:
> I have revived the RTF_LLINFO definition in route.h.
> A new kernel option "COMPAT_ROUTE_FLAGS" is introduced, all
> for providing binary compatibility for existing ports.
> I could have made the RTF_LLINFO bit only applicable with _KERNEL.
>
> W
Hi Pyun,
I've noticed an issue for a while now with my chipset (I think that
this is post an MFC between 7.0 and 7.1, but I could be wrong).
Basically, each CPU (with the ULE scheduler) grabs the task to check
for media status, goes out and attempts to get an IP, and if the
timing of the s
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Comments inline.
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:45:48PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> > Hi Pyun!
>&g
Comments inline.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:45:48PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > Hi Pyun!
> > I know it's been a while since I responded, but after
> > reinstalling my sy
Hi Pyun!
I know it's been a while since I responded, but after
reinstalling my system recently I noticed that the issue I mentioned
almost a year ago
(http://www.mavetju.org/mail/view_thread.php?list=freebsd-net&id=2570821&thread=yes)
with my Marvell chipset card has once again returned. In t
Hi Pyun!
I know it's been a while since I responded, but after
reinstalling my system recently I noticed that the issue I mentioned
almost a year ago
(http://www.mavetju.org/mail/view_thread.php?list=freebsd-net&id=2570821&thread=yes)
with my Marvell chipset card has once again returned. In t
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 03:12:34PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >On Oct 31, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >>I'm running tcpdump on my Mac and I noted a lot of 'bad checksums'
> >>(0x081c
Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Oct 31, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
I'm running tcpdump on my Mac and I noted a lot of 'bad checksums'
(0x081c was the official error in all cases), then consulted the msk
driver. It appears that there's a bug with Yukon II chipset
On Oct 31, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Just to clarify, how are the two hooked together? Is it over
gigabit switch, a 10mbps hub, or directly
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Just to clarify, how are the two hooked together? Is it over
gigabit switch, a 10mbps hub, or directly cabled together?
-Mike
Sure. They're both conn
Tom Judge wrote:
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Just to clarify, how are the two hooked together? Is it over
gigabit switch, a 10mbps hub, or directly cabled together?
-Mike
Sure. They're both connected over a gigabit s
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Just to clarify, how are the two hooked together? Is it over
gigabit switch, a 10mbps hub, or directly cabled together?
-Mike
Sure. They're both connected over a gigabit switch, but the Windows
driver's kind
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hi,
In an effort to connect my 2 machines up -- the FreeBSD 8-CURRENT
and the Windows box, for filesharing via SMB I've installed samba3
and done that song and dance to get things to work. The really weird
thing is
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hi,
In an effort to connect my 2 machines up -- the FreeBSD 8-CURRENT
and the Windows box, for filesharing via SMB I've installed samba3
and done that song and dance to get things to work. The really weird
thing is
Hi,
In an effort to connect my 2 machines up -- the FreeBSD 8-CURRENT
and the Windows box, for filesharing via SMB I've installed samba3
and done that song and dance to get things to work. The really weird
thing is that my 2 machines will talk via ICMP with one another, but
not via TCP an
Julian Elischer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd go with 4.11 or wait the extra month or so..
That's true, but unfortunately...
a) 7-CURRENT isn't production quality, but it's getting closer all the
time.
b) I need to start work soon, sometime within the next few weeks at
the latest. I
Rob Watt wrote:
Hi,
In 6.1-RELEASE there were a number of em driver stability and
performance issues. We would regularly see packet loss at low to
moderate load. A number of patches were applied that completely fixed
the problem for us.
We installed 6.2-RELEASE, but even though 6.2 is suppo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The last time I checked rpcbind was supposed to run on port 111
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/gcooper]# uname -a
FreeBSD hoover.localdomain 6.1-RELEASE-p11 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p11 #18:
Thu Dec 21 09:00:56 PST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HOOV
Hello,
I am having an issue with NFS and SMB on two FreeBSD machines.
The particularly strange thing is that this problem didn't occur when I
ran Gentoo Linux on PC_2.
Setup:
1. PC_1 and PC_2 share with each other via NFS.
2. Both PCs run patched versions of FreeBSD 6.1 RELEASE (see below)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nyoman Bogi Aditya Karna wrote:
> our VPN server is using mpd3.18 + freebsd6.1
> and currently we provide 250 VPN connections
> for our students and it works well.
>
> but when i try to make 500 connections
> the mpd failed to run.
>
> i suspect it w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I hate sort of cross-posting like this, but I haven't received
any word back from anyone on the -questions list yet..
Anyhow, I was wondering if some sort of interface existed with
ipf already where ipf would automatically add b
92 matches
Mail list logo
