are accelerations when using netmap.
>
> cheers
> luigi
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Eduardo Meyer
> wrote:
> > mtu is good, TSO was on, thank you will retest right now.
> >
> > which other port features should I disable? I only disabled txcsum and
> > rxcs
ace used in netmap
> mode, and then check that you use an MTU of 1500 on that
> interface.
> You should not receive frames larger than MTU coming from
> the host in these conditions.
>
> cheers
> luigi
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Eduardo Meyer
> wrote
hello,
I have a netmap application which has host mode bridge/fwd, with default
settings I have the following error some often:
884.260394 [2950] netmap_transmit igb1 from_host, drop packet
size 2962 > 2048
the only application which relies on host mode is bird, so those packets
are pr
d writing to
one single Q or something better? I mean, a multithreaded bridge to check
how many packets we have in the queue and distributing a constant number of
packets to each thread, is it possible/efficient? If I don't have the
constant number of packets I should be able to see TAIL via netmap, right?
Thank you all for all the details on how things actually work.
--
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: dudu.me...@gmail.com
profissional: ddm.farmac...@saude.gov.br
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
-p 8 -c 8" and although debug shows I have 8
threads on 8 CPU with 8 queues I still only see 1 thread working, all other
threads go IDLE. I expected to see at least 2 threads working, say, for
ix0-0 and ix0-1 to fill line rate.
Thank you in advance.
--
===
Eduardo Meyer
_
to 0 or close to it (the ramaining rate is what tcpdump can not
process)
thank you
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to achieve a netmap based bridge which will allow me to
> capture packets from it, say, I want to bridge ix0 + ix1 and
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Eduardo Meyer
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Meyer
>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Meyer
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov > >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> > You could enable mul
the same traffic coming on the wire on ix0 to be available on
both ix1 and ix2.
Will that work like that? I only tried using the default q.
>
>
> On Friday, July 10, 2015, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> should ./kipfw and another ./kipfw work?
&
rio.
What problems should I expect? Can they be minimized?
Basic stateless filtering only.
--
=======
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: dudu.me...@gmail.com
profissional: ddm.farmac...@saude.gov.br
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
adds incomparable
potentials for FreeBSD in the future and hope FreeBSD (Foundation &
Project) gives some extra attention future netmap enhancements.
I also agree Netmap has proven itself with more usable code, utilities and
samples provided by Professor Luigi Rizzo than Intel DPDK and Linu
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Eduardo Meyer
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>>> Should work.
>>> Please try the latest version fro
netmap bridge -> ipfw work too?
>
> On Tuesday, September 30, 2014, Eduardo Meyer
> wrote:
>
>> I have a problem, where I need to fwd a high rate of pps, and I dont have
>> enough CPU. It's around 900Kpps, so I would like to know if ipfw userland
>> vers
Thank you.
--
=======
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: dudu.me...@gmail.com
profissional: ddm.farmac...@saude.gov.br
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freeb
On Wednesday, June 12, 2013, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Eduardo Meyer
>
> > wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like tro try netmap on em(4) device. Other than comping my kernel
>> with netmap what else I need to
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like tro try netmap on em(4) device. Other than comping my kernel
> with netmap what else I need to setup a "production-like" environment to
> test it?
>
> The scenario is a simple BGP route
ut using a special virtual switch (VALE), is it needed?
Or is it for testing scenarios only?
I want to try it on 9-STABLE.
Thanks!
--
=======
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: dudu.me...@gmail.com
profissional: ddm.farmac...@saude.gov.br
___
freebsd-net@f
Hellow,
How do I enable/disable flow control on em driver just like I do on
with igb hw.igb.fc_setting?
If it can't be done via settings, is there any change I can on driver
code to get this flag off?
--
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: dudu.me...@gmail.com
profissional: ddm.f
;
Yes, you are right. Now its way easier to do policy routing and
advanced PBR. However Im still trying to balance outgoing traffic
throught multiple FIBs, per session. But
add prob 0.5 setfib 1 tcp from ${inet} to any 80 in via ${iif} setup keep-state
is not working as I expected...
Some
to any out keep-state
be used to balance (per session) between FIB tables?
>
>
>
>
>
--
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: dudu.me...@gmail.com
profissional: ddm.farmac...@saude.gov.br
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
behavior, can someone please test?
--
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: dudu.me...@gmail.com
profissional: ddm.farmac...@saude.gov.br
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any
can visit v4 networks
transparently, without technical knowledge (say, my girlfriend who is
not a geek).
I guess this is a migration/education strategy, which I intend to
deploy, but right now I am only studying.
Will faith(4) do this for me?
--
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: [EMAIL
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Christopher Cowart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eduardo Meyer wrote:
>> # ifconfig rl0 inet 192.168.2.12 netmask 255.255.255.0
>> # ifconfig rl0 ether 00:02:4f:0a:ce:f3
>>
>> I ask you some help, how can I accomplish both tas
I would like like
to edit /etc/rc.local and any other kind of "workaround". Can rc.conf
issue ifconfig twice for the same nic?
Or can ifconfig accomplish this task by someway else other than
issuing the command twice?
Thank you.
--
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/2/07, David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eduardo Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When a host who is talking to be deletes its arp entry which has my IP
> address, communication goes down, and fxp2 never repl
ing the lists, I saw Chris Boyd faced this same problem in the past:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-July/053689.html
Suggestions anyone? It is a 6.2-STABLE system, cvsuped a long time ago
(when 6.2 branch became unfrozen).
--
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: [EMAIL PROTE
26 matches
Mail list logo
