Chris Dionissopoulos wrote:
> and for every ng_eiface node you attach you must provide a
> mac address for filtering (later this will be automated).
[..]
> gw0#ifconfig ngeth0
> ngeth0:
> flags=28943 mtu
> 1500
>inet6 fe80::260:8ff:fee8:589e%ngeth0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6
>inet
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> first, thanks for you answer.
>
> Do you mean that it is not possible to export two directories from the
> same filesystem with different options or credentials ? I didn't see
> anything like this in the manpage. What did I miss ?
That's the case indeed. The exports(5) m
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Look at this small session. The initial exports(5) file works fine. The
> second one generate an error.
>
> %%%
> propane:tataz# cat /etc/exports
> /usr/home/ncvs -ro -network 172.16.0.0 -mask 255.255.0.0
> /usr/home/tataz -maproot=tataz -net
Neo-Vortex wrote:
> alias Establish an additional network address for this interface. This
> is sometimes useful when changing network numbers, and one wishes
> to accept packets addressed to the old interface. If the address
> is on the same subnet a
Donatas wrote:
> is there any posibility to use Fore Marconi HE155 under 4.11?
No, you'll need to upgrade to FreeBSD 5.x for that.
--
Dean C. Strik Eindhoven University of Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ipnet6.org/
"This isn't right. This isn't eve
Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > I use RR all the time.
> > it allows you to record the reverse path, (up to the size limitation).
>
> Which won't get you far these days... ;-)
I use it occasionally, on our highly asymmetric site. The length
restriction is not a problem there :
Marc Olzheim wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 05:18:34PM +0100, Marc Olzheim wrote:
> > > Just setup net-snmp, and zabbix to monitor it ... what exactly is an
> > > Octet? 1 byte?
> >
> > Jup, one byte, usually from the cable, into the port.
>
> Arg, I read 'inOctet' instead of 'an Octet'. Never
Shaun Jurrens wrote:
> I have two dell 1750's connected to a c3750 switch. FEC works with ip
> addresses attached to the fec0 interfaces (although, single connections seem
> to remain on one link or the other, I haven't played with the load-balancing
> on the switch yet for the channel group, migh
Michael Sierchio wrote:
> Chuck Swiger wrote:
>
> >Many people are wrong, then. NAT is not a security feature.
>
> We simply disagree.
Puh-leaze. Not this discussion again. Can we stay on topic please?
--
Dean C. Strik Eindhoven University of Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAI
Markus Stumpf wrote:
> Problem:
> I have an email message that is 3374 Bytes. It should be sent via SMTP
> to another server that is behind a PIX Firewall.
> The communiction gets tricky at the end of the message, because instead of
> CR LF "." CR LF
> packet N contains
> data CR LF "." CR
Don Bowman wrote:
> Is anyone using the intel dual gigabit 82546EB? Does it appear as two
> separate em devices, eg em0 and em1?
Yup:
em0: port
0x1000-0x103f
em0: Speed:100 Mbps Duplex:Full
em1: port
0x1040-0x107f
em1: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A
--
Dean C. Strik Eindhoven Universit
Oles' Hnatkevych wrote:
>I need rock-solid OSPF daemon that works on FreeBSD-4.5.
>Zebra has not proved to be that one since tun(4) interfaces
>are created on the fly - it crashes the box.
Which is not zebra's fault... better fix the system than work around it
by using an other progra
12 matches
Mail list logo
