Michael Sierchio wrote: > Chuck Swiger wrote: > > >Many people are wrong, then. NAT is not a security feature. > > We simply disagree.
Puh-leaze. Not this discussion again. Can we stay on topic please? -- Dean C. Strik Eindhoven University of Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ipnet6.org/ "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." -- Wolfgang Pauli _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
