Re: RFC: ipfirewall_forward patch

2001-11-16 Thread Chrisy Luke
Mikel King wrote (on Nov 16): > Just curious, but what's a doddle? It's like a doodle, but with less o's and more d's. :) It essentially means "this is easy to do". Chris. -- == [EMAIL PROTECTED]T: +44 845 333 0122 == Global IP Network Engineering, Easynet G

Re: RFC: ipfirewall_forward patch

2001-11-14 Thread Chrisy Luke
Excuse me feollowing up to myself, but... Chrisy Luke wrote (on Nov 15): > It looks good. The ipfw syntax doesn't quite make sense to me. > Also, are you requiring that they all be on the same ipfw rule number? Ignore this. Just occured to me you're sharing load based on a n

Re: RFC: ipfirewall_forward patch

2001-11-14 Thread Chrisy Luke
Julian Elischer wrote (on Nov 15): > Oops forgot the patch.. here it is... I almost replied to the first - too quick off the mark! > Julian Elischer wrote: > > Ipfw 'fwd' at present has teh following restriction: > > > > only packets already leaving the system can be hijacked and forwarded >