Excuse me feollowing up to myself, but... Chrisy Luke wrote (on Nov 15): > It looks good. The ipfw syntax doesn't quite make sense to me. > Also, are you requiring that they all be on the same ipfw rule number?
Ignore this. Just occured to me you're sharing load based on a netmask. A small state cache and we could do this dynamically, based on some metric. hmm. I'll go to sleep now. Chris. -- == [EMAIL PROTECTED] T: +44 845 333 0122 == Global IP Network Engineering, Easynet Group PLC F: +44 845 333 0122 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
