Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> # ifconfig rl0 inet 192.168.2.12 netmask 255.255.255.0
> # ifconfig rl0 ether 00:02:4f:0a:ce:f3
>
> I ask you some help, how can I accomplish both tasks with rc_ng? In
> /etc/rc.conf
Somebody might have a hint for a single ifconfig command, but you can
also create the file
Javier Ubillos wrote:
> Hi freebsd-net.
> (Sorry for cross posting. This time I think I found the right forum for
> my question)
>
> I'm implementing a NAT (1 ip - 1 ip) like router. (it's not actually
> NAT, but it's a good analogy for this case).
>
> I have chosen to use pcaplib to pick up the
David DeSimone wrote:
> Christopher Cowart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Notice that both carp interfaces are running in "BACKUP" mode on box1,
> > even after some period of waiting. I would expect things to return to
> > the initial state.
>
Hello,
I have the following configuration:
box1:/etc/rc.conf:
| ifconfig_bge1="up"
| ifconfig_vlan95="inet 10.9.128.2/20 vlan 95 vlandev bge1"
| ifconfig_carp15="inet 10.9.128.1/32 vhid 15 pass secret advskew 100"
| ifconfig_carp25="inet 10.9.128.1/32 vhid 25 pass secret"
box2:/etc/rc.conf:
| if
Christopher Cowart wrote:
> I'm a little confused on exactly how to pass a struct as a message to a
> netgraph node via ngctl. What am I missing here?
I found my answer in the comments of src/sys/netgraph/ng_parse.h:
| Structures:
|
| '{' [ = ... ] '}'
|
Hello,
I'm running a 7.0-RELEASE machine. I've backported the 7-STABLE for
ng_nat, because I'm really interested in the static NAT features from
libalias.
ng_nat(4) says:
| NGM_NAT_REDIRECT_ADDR (redirectaddr)
| Redirect traffic for public IP address to a machine on the local
| network. This
Hello,
I've been debugging some scripts for the better part of the hour, and
finally figured out what's going on.
On 6.2, `ipfw table 3 list' outputs:
169.229.127.61/32 100127061
But on 7.0, `ipfw table 4 list' outputs:
10.9.156.254/32 11.237.178.84
They're different tables with different value
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 02:00:04PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 07:57:28PM -0800, Christopher Cowart wrote:
>> While I have your attention, I am also suffering from a problem that was
>> reported to -questions here[1]. About 3 times a day, I'll see the
Hello,
I followed the instructions in carp(4) and set up a load balancing and
failover configuration on vlan interfaces -- it's working fine (as long
as I don't `ifconfig carp25 destroy'...).
In order to really make use of this functionality, I need a user land
method of figuring out whether a MA
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:03:53PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 06:38:40PM -0800, Christopher Cowart wrote:
>>On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:43:55PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>>>On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 01:17:12AM -0800, Christopher Cowart wrote:
>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:43:55PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 01:17:12AM -0800, Christopher Cowart wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a mac mini running 7.0-RC3, which I'm trying to turn it into a
>> router. I have a Linksys SRW2008 &qu
Hello,
I have a mac mini running 7.0-RC3, which I'm trying to turn it into a
router. I have a Linksys SRW2008 "fully managed" (via an IE only web
interface, ick) switch.
Switch:
Port 1 - Trunk vlans 10,60,98 - FreeBSD Box
Port 7 - Access vlan 98 - Existing LAN (192.168.1.0/24)
OpenWRT (192.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:56:10AM -0200, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
>On 1/30/08, Andrei Kolu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
This server is an Dell Power Edge 1950, QuadCore 2.83, 2Gb Ram, one
bce gigabit interface connected to a gigabit port of a Cisco 4500 in
>
Hello,
I'm trying to use the ng_nat node on 6.2.
I have one set of IP -> ng cookie mappings in tables and a single
default mapping for anything that doesn't match the tables.
The first case, using tables, is the "Authenticated" case:
| /sbin/ipfw add netgraph tablearg all from "table(4)" to any
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 12:44:47AM +0300, Cristian KLEIN wrote:
>Christopher Cowart wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:58:15AM +0300, Cristian KLEIN wrote:
>>> Christopher Cowart wrote:
>>>> We're working on expanding our wireless network. Unfortunately, we&
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 01:26:13PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> original:
>> We're working on expanding our wireless network. Unfortunately, we're
>> running out of IP addresses (aren't we all). As much as I'd love to just
>> tell everyone to use IPv6, that isn't gonna fly. The next plan to
>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:57:19PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> On Monday 24 September 2007, Cristian KLEIN wrote:
> > Christopher Cowart wrote:
> > > The real question is: what's the best way to dynamically update the
> > > NAT table?
> >
> > You may use
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:58:15AM +0300, Cristian KLEIN wrote:
>Christopher Cowart wrote:
>>We're working on expanding our wireless network. Unfortunately, we're
>>running out of IP addresses (aren't we all). As much as I'd love to just
>>tell everyone to
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 03:58:16PM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> We have worked around the problem for now with a simple shell script
> that looks for racoon falling over and simply restarting it.
How are you detecting when racoon gets wedged? I'd like to replicate
that on our systems.
Thanks,
Hello,
We're working on expanding our wireless network. Unfortunately, we're
running out of IP addresses (aren't we all). As much as I'd love to just
tell everyone to use IPv6, that isn't gonna fly. The next plan to
consider is using an RFC1918 pool and NATing the traffic.
If only it were that s
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:43:25PM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On 8/20/07, VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I tracked down the problem a few years ago, on FreeBSD 4.11, with
> > KAME's IPSec stack.
> >
> > But the problem was not really in the stack itself, but rather in
> > socket
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 05:35:33PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Christopher Cowart wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:30:23PM -0400, Boris Kochergin wrote:
> >>Christopher Cowart wrote:
> >>>I have a server with two NICs:
> >>>
> >>>em0:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:30:23PM -0400, Boris Kochergin wrote:
> Christopher Cowart wrote:
> >I have a server with two NICs:
> >
> >em0:169.229.79.139/25
> >vlan526:169.229.126.9/24
> >
> >The default gateway is 169.229.79.129. The router
Hello,
I have a server with two NICs:
em0:169.229.79.139/25
vlan526:169.229.126.9/24
The default gateway is 169.229.79.129. The router for the 126 subnet is
169.229.126.1.
netstat -rn:
| DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire
| default
24 matches
Mail list logo
