From: Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: kernel mode httpd/ftpd for FreeBSD?
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:43:52 +0300
> Junho,
>
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:42:27PM +0900, CHOI Junho wrote:
> C> I understand what you mean. If so, why serious network server like
From: Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: kernel mode httpd/ftpd for FreeBSD?
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:19:45 +0100
> On Monday 07 February 2005 10:20, CHOI Junho wrote:
> > Anyone knows about kernel-mode httpd/ftpd for FreeBSD? (just like tux
> > of linuxI searc
Anyone knows about kernel-mode httpd/ftpd for FreeBSD? (just like tux
of linuxI searched several times but failed.
--
CHOI Junho <http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key fingerprint = 1369 7374 A45F F41A F3C0 07E3 4A01 C020 E60
e
> > over a wide range of bw*delay situations. (in progress)
>
> What a wonderful idea. Can't wait for the bikesheds...
Me too. Also it would be very helpful if we have Selective ACK(SACK) feature.
--
CHOI Junho <http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh> KFUG
FreeBSD Pro
Hi,
Is there any patches of SACK for 4.9? I found patches against 4.3 but
it is very hard to apply.
--
CHOI Junho <http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh> KFUG
FreeBSD Project Web Data Bank
Key fingerprint = 1369 7374 A45F F41A F3C0 07E3 4A01 C020 E60
> buffers? Or is any dependency for mbufclusters value? (e.g. RAM size,
> > kern.maxusers value or etc)
> >
> > p.s. RAM is 2G, Xeon 2.0G x 1 or 2 machines.
>
> You probably need to bump up KVA_PAGES to fit in all the extra mbuf
> clusters you're allocating.
Can
Or is any dependency for mbufclusters value? (e.g. RAM size,
kern.maxusers value or etc)
p.s. RAM is 2G, Xeon 2.0G x 1 or 2 machines.
--
CHOI Junho <http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh> KFUG
FreeBSD Project Web Data Bank
Key fingerprint = 1369 7374 A45F F41A F3C0 07E3 4A0
After more investigation, I realized the problem is on the router
side. I think the problem is solved... Thanks.
From: Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD -> Windows HTTP TCP performance
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:12:34 -0600 (CST)
>
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, C
From: Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD -> Windows HTTP TCP performance
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:30:23 +0100
> CHOI Junho wrote:
> >
> > For those who interested, I made packet dump file:
> >
> > http://www.kr.freebsd.org/~cjh/misc
For those who interested, I made packet dump file:
http://www.kr.freebsd.org/~cjh/misc/freebsd-net/
Best thing is do tcpdump at client machine but I have no admin
permission, so failed.
--
CHOI Junho <http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh> KFUG
FreeBSD Project Web Data Ban
(80.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled
da1: 35046MB (71775284 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4467C)
--
CHOI Junho <http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh> KFUG
FreeBSD Project Web Data Bank
Key fingerprint = 1369 7374 A45F F41A F3C0 07E3 4A01 C020 E602 60F5
_
Hi,
Our company's web service has noticable difference serving Windows
HTTP clients(IE) (98, 2000, XP). It is relatively slow comparing
Windows -> Windows case.
- FreeBSD(4.7,4.8,4.9) thttpd/apache/builtin ftpd -> Windows 2000 : 300-800Kbytes/sec
- Windows 2000 IIS(no optimization) -> Windows
ance tuning hints of gigabit networking?
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:00:14 -0500
>
>
> You're not running out of mbufs or clusters, you're out of RAM.
> Don't bump up nmbclusters anymore because you don't need to; instead,
> add more RAM.
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 200
p() everything, when memory is full, it
releases all mmap()'ed entries, and reload again. That's why I try
thttpd patched to use sendfile() instead of mmap().
--
CHOI Junho <http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh> KFUG
FreeBSD Project Web Data Bank
Key fingerprint = 1369 73
traffic is <
100Mbits then).
So another problem comes with kern.ipc.nsfbufs -- I tried to
increase arbitrary values but it also cause kernel panic.
Final: What is a good math for calculating these values safely?
kern.ipc.nmbclusters
kern.ipc.nsfbufs
From: CHOI Junho <[EMAIL PRO
e just a few connections, but each is pulling a large amount of
> bandwidth?
>
> That will make a difference on what tweaks I'd suggest to use on the
> machine.
>
> --
> David Rhodus
--
CHOI Junho <http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh> KFUG
FreeBSD Project
.maskrepl=0
net.inet.tcp.inflight_enable=1
kernel configuration is not specially tuned, except DEVICE_POLLING and
HZ=2000.
--
CHOI Junho <http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh> KFUG
FreeBSD Project Web Data Bank
Key fingerprint = 1369 7374 A45F F41A F3C0 07E3 4A01 C020 E602 60F5
To Unsub
ound only it
is not implemented at least in 4.7. Is there any patches for
implementing it or still it is to-do features? Or do we have a
reason why bridge+ipfw fwd is impossible?
p.s. Please keep me on Cc:.
--
CHOI Junho <http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh>
FreeBSD Project
/kernel: em0: Link is up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex
I updated em0 driver to 1.3.8 from Intel webpage, but it no helps.
Can you suggest some advice? If not, I have to back to 4.5R-p5.
--
+++ Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my employers +++
CHOI Junho [sleeping now]
From: CHOI Junho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 1000baseSX support in em/gx/wx?
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 18:51:28 +0900 (KST)
> Recently I have a chance to test Gigabit ethernet card based on
> 82543GC-F chipset based(Intel Pro/1000 F adapter, I think. It is at
> data center so I
000baseSX type cable?
--
+++ Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my employers +++
CHOI Junho [sleeping now]<http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh>
[while sleeping]
Korea FreeBSD Users GroupWeb Data Bank
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d) but I can't get good answers.
p.s. I am doing NAT + Transparent Proxy in my home(ADSL). It works nicely.
--
+++ Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my employers +++
CHOI Junho [sleeping now]<http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh>
[while sleep
22 matches
Mail list logo
