FreeBSD__ value being undefined, i.e. 0).
>
> I guess one could add even more ifdef logic could be added to handle
> that, but it seems a bit pointless since 2.x is such an old release
> series.
>
> If there is no objection I will check in the attached patch.
>
m or a better
> solution with the way networking now works... (i noticed that issuing a
> 'route change' of an existing route with the GATEWAY flag set seems to
> work as it doesn't drop the flag when the gateway changes under it...)
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> -
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:48:36AM -0700, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Brian Hechinger wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I've been having some trouble with a GRE tunnel. Specifically with
> > non-IP traffic (DECnet, in this case)
BSD wiggum 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243826: Tue Dec 4 06:55:39
UTC 2012 r...@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
Thanks!
-brian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
currently in a position to
upgrade.
Kind Regards,
Brian Hughes
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi,
Can I get an answer regarding the below.
Thanks
Regards,
Brian Stivala
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Brian Stivala wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> Thanks for your reply,
>
> This is my Pciconf and the /var/log/dmesg.boot. As you can see the
> ethernet card is there but it i
Full Speed USB v1.0
ad0: 1967MB at ata0-master PIO4
ugen0.1: at usbus0
uhub0: on usbus0
Root mount waiting for: usbus0
uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ufs/pfsense0
Invalid time in real time clock.
Check and reset the date immediately!
Regards,
Bri
ere near as much as I want to.)
> --
> Freddie Cash
> fjwc...@gmail.com
> ___
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net
Send us:
grep ifconfig /etc/rc.conf
ifconfig -a
ifconfig -m
netstat -i
netstat -rn
netstat -i
arp -an
For both the working and non-working cards to compare.
Thx,
~BAS
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.
Just to say today I upgraded from 8.1 to 8.2 and xl0 stopped wo
m understand, that ping "itself" is rarely situation,
> but
> it worked in 7.x!
What happens if you "route delete 192.168.1.1" and then try the ping
without using -S?
--
Brian Somers
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humou
red I cannot put a gre interface into a bridge. (ps, I'm
trying to bridge to a vlan interface)
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks!
--Brian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
red I cannot put a gre interface into a bridge. (ps, I'm
trying to bridge to a vlan interface)
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks!
--Brian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
Brian Reichert
55 Crystal Ave. #286
Derry NH 03038-1725 USA BSD admin/developer at large
_
list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
Brian Reichert
55 Crystal Ave. #286
Derry NH 03038-1725 USA BSD admin/developer at
destroying your routing table after adding an alias to a VLAN
interface in rc.conf(5), simply run:
$ sudo /etc/rc.d/netif [VLAN] start
DO NOT RESTART, and you should be okay.
~BAS
References:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2008-February/023440.html
http://www.freebsd.or
great. I maxed out a 100Mbps LAN connection...so no bandwidth
hit either.
I know 8.0 is in the RC phase...is there any chance that this simple
patch can be put into 8.0? If you have any questions on what I did or
more details on my setup, please don't hesitate to ask!
Thank
As promised, I'm dropping an on-list update of our GRE migration
project. We're running just under 1,000 GRE interfaces (with ipsec
inside) with no problems on a dualproc/quadcore xeon 2.8 under 7.2-REL
(can't sup to anything later as someone broke the Compaq RAID driver).
We're only pushing about
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 12:12 -0700, Graham Smith wrote:
> requiring creation of native vlan (vlan 0) and why native vlan are
> most suitable for this scene ?
Cisco highly recommend changing the management VLAN away from VLAN1.
Here's an example, of using alternative native VLANs, ironically, on t
All:
The description on this sysctl was just recently added in -CURRENT. It
was missing during all of RELENG_6 and RELENG_7? Do we not trust it
entirely, ergo the two hour initial threshold and lack of documentation?
It also seems like the description could be bit more insightful; looks
like it
Anyone know of plans or status for implementation of L2TPv3 in FreeBSD?
Support for it would solve a lot of interoperability heartache with
Cisco devices...
Thanks!
/bmj
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
ve tunnels.
Please advise if the group (or any individuals) want performance data
from real world usage.
/bmj
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jacobs, Brian
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 12:50 PM
To: Julian Elischer
Cc: f
Synopsis: ppp(8) crashing with port 65535 in "nat port"
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->brian
Responsible-Changed-By: brian
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jul 19 07:15:48 UTC 2009
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'll take a look at this.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/quer
o doubt their own existence.
~Brian A. Seklecki
(*) To disable port randomization on the Cisco PIX:
tcp-map verify-chksum
check-retransmission
checksum-verification
exceed-mss drop
syn-data drop
tcp-options selective-ack allow
urgent-flag clear
no ttl-evasion-protection
!
icmp unreachable
6 10.10.201.1UGS 0 2042 gre46
10.10.201.110.3.100.39UH 149263 gre46
/bmj
-Original Message-
From: Julian Elischer [mailto:jul...@elischer.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 12:45 PM
To: Jacobs, Brian
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subjec
Does anyone have some realistic data on the number of GRE/ipip tunnels
FreeBSD 7.x can reasonably terminate? Assume no IPsec, just standard
encapsulation. I have an ad-hoc need to terminate about 1,4000 static
GRE tunnels (as Cisco 7206's are backordered until September). J
Thanks in advance
upport/UndisciplinedLocalClock
> +# The use of Orphan Mode may be preferable.
> #
> -server 127.127.1.0
> -fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 10
> +#server 127.127.1.0
> +#fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 10
I'd tend to suggest stratum 13 so that the inattentive admin
doesn
ect, how can I use mapall option?
Your exports file should say:
/usr/shared/cond1 -maproot=whatever pc01
/usr/shared/cond2 -maproot=somethingelse pc02
The two entries for the same physical filesystem are fine as
long as you don't atempt to duplicate the remote host.
--
Brian Somers
ow you to associate
mount options per local filesystem per remote machine, so this
version:
> /usr/home pc02 pc02
> /cond1 -mapall=user2 pc01 pc02
> /cond2 -mapall=user1 pc01 pc02
is correct, but only if /cond1 and /cond2 are different filesystems.
If they're the same, this wo
ver is actively worked on and I got a lot of help and bug fixes
from the maintainers of the driver, whereas the FreeBSD driver is
hopelessly neglected and broken.
Brian
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Mihail Balikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to setup 10gbi
x27;m waiting to get some time on the
Ixia at work to generate performance numbers for 1G and 10G for all
packet sizes, on FreeBSD and Linux, on a 16 core system, and blast it
to the list. I expect Linux to do 2-3 times better :-)
Later,
Brian
___
freebsd
> Hi Brian
> I very much doubt that this is ceteris paribus. This is 384 random IPs
> -> 384 random IP addresses with a flow lookup for each packet. Also,
> I've read through igb on Linux - it has a lot of optimizations that
> the FreeBSD driver lacks and I have yet to im
.04
> Mpps in on igb0 and 1.04 Mpps out on igb1) using 3.5 cores on an 8
> core system.
I have a 8 core system running stock Linux that easily does line rate
(ie, 1.488 Mpps) on 3 (82575) interfaces. Ie, 3 * 1.48 Mpps!
Cheers,
Brian.
>
> -Kip
>
policy routing rules. Here's an example with PF:
: pass out quick route-to ($other_if $other_gw) from ($other_if)
I really am an ipfilter fan. It's greate that pf support this. But I
think ipfilter doesn't yet. At least not the ve
Here's the routing table,
#~>netstat -rn
Internet:
DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire
default85.97.0.1 UGS 0 25211312 tun0
10 10.1.1.222 UGS 0 3407666xl0
10.1.1/24 link#2
Anyone has a clue why this might be happening?
-Brian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I prefer (2) - non-intrusive on em, and the new one doesn't have to deal
with legacy or backward compatibility with em.
Any commonality with ixgbe?
Later
Brian.
On 10/29/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have an important decision to make and I thought rather th
,SNDBUF=262144
TF=MSS=1024,NODELAY,REQ_SCALE,REQ_TSTMP)
A little bit more definitive than "Oh hey apache stopped complaining."
Any other way?
l8*
-lava (Brian A. Seklecki - Pittsburgh, PA, USA)
http://www.spiritual-machines.org/
"Guilty? Yeah. But he k
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:04:18 +0200 Stefan Ehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 14 July 2007 21:21:32 Brian Somers wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:18:49 +0200 Stefan Ehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On CURRENT, each time I stop/start vpnc a new tun
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 13:01:06 -0600 Brett Glass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:41 PM 7/14/2007, Brian Somers wrote:
> >I expect unacknowledged LQR packets to be resent
> >5 times (exactly the same packet), and the 6th
> >timeout to cause a line drop.
>
>
he vpnc-script destroy_tun_device()
function, but even if I add FreeBSD to that, it creates the additional
interfaces. Maybe this is because I'm passing it bogus data and the
connection attempt doesn't cleanup properly either.
Have you tried talking to the port writer or maintainer?
--
ement it
properly.
Of course the *other* option is to implement an
LQM strategy. I've never come up with anything
that might really be useful though - except for
suggesting that LQR is disabled.
--
Brian Somers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Don't _EVE
s)
as there are several old OpenBSD/pf setups that have
issues with wscale > 4. Hopefully these setups will
be fixed by the time 7.0 is released, as windows/vista
and linux/debian now set wscale > 4 too.
The patch is pretty small though, so you may want to
try applyi
I'm having a strange situation for quite sometime. I have two external
interfaces one of which is an ADSL interface tun0 and obtains IP address
dynamically and the other is a (xl1) leased line which has a static
global IP address, lets say 212.64.212.180. Both interfaces access
internet without
, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &s, sizeof s);
>if (bind(s, (struct sockaddr *)&ss, sz) < 0) {
> log_Printf(LogWARN, "Tcp: bind: %s\n", strerror(errno));
>
>
> Sincerely,
AFAIR I had trouble getting that code to work and was advised at
the time that I'
ing place.
An ethernet full-duplex/half-duplex mismatch can cause packet loss in the 2%
range, which is not enough for the network to be visibly "broken", but
enough for it to perform very badly. Worst offenders here are old Cisco
Catalyst 29xx switch
lo' side you
could set up SAs for
10.0.1.0/24 -> 10.0.2.0/24
10.0.1.0/24 -> 10.0.3.0/24
both with a tunnel IP of the 'personal colo' server. Here, I'm assuming that
10.0.2.0/24 is the 'personal colo' space, and 10.0.3.0/24 is the 'home'
space.
R
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 11:20:47AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2006, at 5:30 AM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> >Brian Candler (B.Candler) writes:
> >>So to make an update, you would have to unmount from box 2,
> >>remount RW on
> >>box 1, make the chang
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 02:44:52PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
> >>I can solve this problem with Linux
> >How?
> With a shared filesystem of course.
Specifically, which one? If there is a good filesystem for this application
perhaps it could be ported.
___
RO again on box 2.
> I can solve this problem with Linux
How?
> Of course what is really needed here is a cluster filesystem, or an NFS
> server/file system which can solve this problem at its level.
Indeed. This was discussed at some length before, and the same answers we
" definitely offer a DHCP service? In that case it
would be a "router". Maybe you need to talk PPPoE instead.
Have a look at their instructions for configuring a Windows client. If it
talks about setting up a dialler, where you enter a username and password,
then it's
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 09:17:37PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> I've been noodling over this for two weeks now, and am thinking
> that the easiest thing to do might be is map every address in each
> "virtual" router to a unique address from FreeBSD's point of view
> (i.e. 192.168.0.2 on LAN 1 bec
TM there are a zillion userland-to-kernel and kernel-to-kernel
communication interfaces:
- ioctl
- geom
- cam
- netgraph
- vfs
- sysctl
- kmem
- procfs
- ...
Perhaps they could all be replaced by netgraph??
Regards,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.
sync with 6.x and -CURRENT could start
> shortly...
Also, what would really suit him is a netgraph IP interface node - i.e.
something which takes raw ethernet frames from the interface, performs IP
encapsulation/decapsulation and ARP - and an IP forwarding node with its own
forwarding tabl
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 12:38:56PM +0300, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> Can I somehow use lo1 address
> for connections initiated from Host_2?
Options I know of:
(1) the application which originates the connection can explicitly bind
to the lo1 address (see for example telnet -s and ping -S options)
s together onto the same NIC.
Also - you may still end up with a separate outside IP per vimage or VM, so
maybe then you need another NAT instance to NAT all of those onto a single
IP address :-)
Regards,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing
f this was a HTTP 'PUT' then a simple CGI could
read in 100 bytes, check it is compressed (e.g. with libmagic), then copy
through the rest of the file. The result from the PUT can be a HTML page
saying "all OK" or "please compress your data first"
Regards,
Brian.
ssing ")"
I think you need to use a table. Or choose another workaround, e.g. two
rules with separate counters, or two rules which jump to another rule which
does the counting.
Regards,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 11:47:33AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> What I remain upset about, though, is that the rcmdsh(), which is used by
> rcmd() ignores the fd2p parameter making it impossible to capture the
> remote's stderr...
Well, it's probably worth send-pr'ing it.
I'd first test whet
d ports (either by installing Unix with their own root
password, or by installing DOS and sending packets which come from
privileged ports)
HTH,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
you could upgrade dig to a version from a newer version of
BIND, as ISTR this was fixed in the application.
So much for the IPv4-IPv6 transition being transparent to applications :-(
Regards,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
ust want something to visualize your top 20 traffic sources and
protocols, i.e. keep an eye on your network and notice sudden new large
sources such as viruses or P2P nodes, it may be useful.
Regards,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
ed by sflow. If you have an sflow-capable switch, this is a
very efficient way of doing this analysis. You can turn the sflow data into
simple CSV records using 'sflowtool', or ntop has an sflow module.
This assumes that taking the sampled data and multiplying it by 128 wi
n top of IPSEC _transport_ mode (e.g. those running routing
protocols like OSPF over tunnels)
Regards,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ble, documented
by the manufacturer, and has a full robust implementation of all the RS232
control lines in an open-source driver, I'd like to buy one.
For some laptops a PCMCIA COM port is an option, but many modern laptops
don't have
ope with 30% packet loss.
Perhaps a mechanism which sends each packet 3 times would work, but then
tripling the load on your link will increase your packet loss even more,
perhaps leading to total collapse.
Regards,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailin
90, as for this one end has
to be digitally connected (typically T1/E1 trunk, although in theory you
might be able to find a modem which is physically connected as ISDN BRI but
which supports v90 analogue modulation)
The best you'll get is v34bis (33.6K)
Regards,
Brian.
___
RTS handshaking, and
the port is configured for this too; with pppd it's "crtscts", I don't know
about userland ppp; and ensure the cables are wired properly)
If your app could cope with the lack of bandwidth, forcing the modems to
2400bps operation can make links over dodgy lin
y:
# route delete -net 0.0.0.0 -netmask 10.0.0.17
(i.e. network 0, netmask &a11, like the netstat entry shows). I've tried
it here, it successfully removes your junk route under 6.0
Regards,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing l
samples and start tweaking to add whatever
features and policies you like. The entire flow-of-control, from accepting
mail to delivering it, is soft-coded in the configure file (but it doesn't
look like Snoopy swearing)
Regards,
Brian.
___
freebsd-n
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:47:48AM -0700, Nash Nipples wrote:
>hi, i just dont see any options to make it work
>
> "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -Ac -t" works fine
> but "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -O ConnectOnlyTo=smtp.external.co... -Ac -t" just
> wont work:
> WARNING: RunAsUser for MSP ignore
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:38:39AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Would it be possible to improve the behaviour of the TCP protocol
> implementation so that out-of-order reception was acceptable?
Possibly - but if your FreeBSD box is acting as a router, and it re-orders
packets in transit to t
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 11:14:09AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> A few things..
>
> 1/ thisn is a FreeBSD list so we are not very familiar with linux.
> 2/ PPPOE uses PPP which is a point-to-point protocol and does not support
> broadcast.
> 3/ DHCP is a broadcast protocol and does not s
; > of windows machine
> >
> > But there is no result
> >
> > Without PPPoE interfaces the windows machine is getting an
> > ip in the range 192.168.40.
> >
> &g
n by 'ifconfig -a'. When you ping the default
gateway, does the ARP cache get updated? (arp -an)
HTH,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 01:14:27PM +0200, Sten Daniel Srsdal wrote:
> hostap should work, ad-hoc should work. by infrastructure you mean that
> the card operates as a 'station'? then it shouldn't work (correctly) as
> defined by the standard. commercial products tend to implement "mac-nat"
I've se
nerated from saved
> tcpdump
> capture file (trace file).
Interesting - how does it differ from /usr/ports/net-mgmt/tcpreplay ?
Regards,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To
y has meaning for serial links (e.g. where
layer 1 is RS232 / V24)
PPP frames carried inside ethernet (i.e. pppoe) are therefore also carried
using synchronous encoding, since ethernet is synchronous.
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 11:27:00AM +0800, fooler wrote:
> >what the heck is synchronous pppoe? we connect to pppoe via ethernet so
> >it is already synchronous (?)
>
> set speed sync
And how does that change the pppoe ethernet frames?
___
freebsd-net@f
in all situations (and
many are not)
Regards,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
years ago using FreeBSD 4.x (4.6.2 I
think), where all the front-ends used NFS to access data on a shared
fileserver platform (NetApp). It worked without a hitch, and still does.
Regards,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fr
nd capacitive
components to earth, so it may not float that far.
Regards,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
s* relying on
locking somehow, directly or indirectly.
Regards,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ay is to run your daemon (ntpd, syslogd etc) within a jail, and give
the jail your public loopback as its IP address.
Another is just to configure each daemon to bind to the appropriate port, if
it supports that option. syslogd has a '-b' flag; I don't know if nt
cts, there's almost certainly a transparent cache upstream.
(3) You have some sort of path MTU issue. I don't know why. Perhaps your
upstream link is running PPPoE or something which is not clear for 1500-byte
packets. If so, it ought to work, but bad filter
19
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:47:08 GMT
Connection: Keep-Alive
301 Moved
301 Moved
The document has moved
http://www.google.com/";>here.
Connection closed by foreign host.
OK, that's fine. google.com has redirected me to www.google.com. So try the
whole process again with www.
your servers
reachable. And keep a spare switch in the closet.
Method (3) is the one I've used successfully for a mailserver cluster. There
were two MX receivers, two webmail servers, four POP3 servers; half on one
uplink and half on the other. IMO it's at least as likely likely that a
wh
uld only need
two 'binat' rules, but I'm not sure how you go about reversing the in/out
sense. There's a separate freebsd-pf mailing list which might be able to
help.
Regards,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
eed
-redirect_address 192.168.0.1 192.168.100.1
-redirect_address 192.168.0.2 192.168.100.2
...
and on GW2 you'd need
-redirect_address 192.168.0.1 192.168.200.1
-redirect_address 192.168.0.2 192.168.200.2
...
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@fr
e, e.g. by putting loads of 'volatile'
declarations in, but catching every single case where this is required is
extremely different.
This may be more of a problem with the kernel than with userland though.
Regards,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.or
teway PC which
monitors the link status, and changes its own defaultroute to point to the
other ISP.
HTH,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 06:50:06PM +1030, Aluminium Oxide wrote:
> > Suggestion: use unified diff (diff -u res_debug.org.c res_debug.c). It's
> > *much* easier to read.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Brian.
>
> Thankyou Brian, I've done as you su
sender, and this is pointless. As you say, it does trigger the
path MTU problem elsewhere in the network, but even if path MTU were working
correctly, it would result in a sub-optimal choice of MSS.
(Aside: RFC 1661 section 6.1 says that if an implementation asks for an MRU
of less than 1500, it MU
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 08:39:41AM -0600, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Brian Candler wrote:
> >>1. PPP negotiates an MRU of 1400
> >>2. However, ifconfig ng0 shows an MTU of 1376 (where does that come from?)
> >>3. When the client opens a TCP connection, it offers an
ich kills and restarts bind. Does mpd have
a hook to call a script on interface up?
Regards,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 11:04:04AM +, Brian Candler wrote:
> I've done a bit more debugging on the MSS problem I'm having with sl2tps
> running with IPSEC transport layer security. The client is Windows XP
> out-of-the-box.
>
> Here's what happens:
>
>
IPPROTO_UDP,PR_ATOMIC|PR_ADDR,
- udp_input, 0, udp_ctlinput, ip_ctloutput,
+ udp_input, 0, udp_ctlinput, udp_ctloutput,
0,
udp_init,0, 0, 0,
&udp_usrreqs
Haven't tested it yet - just waiting for ker
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 03:49:18PM +0100, Sebastian Schwerdhoefer wrote:
> Short question:
> Is it possible to redirect packets from localhost with "rdr"?
Short answer: yes.
Longer answer: perhaps this is the kind of thing you're looking for.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2005-Sep
ght help locate it.
If you still think its an IPSEC problem, "options IPSEC_DEBUG" might also be
useful.
Regards,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
y. (Presumably you do have IP
forwarding turned on, since the gateway works in the absence of IPSEC)
I suggest you don't "browse" from XP: start by sending pings. Then you have
a steady stream of packets, and DNS doesn't get in the way either.
Regards,
Brian.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
0 any -P in ipsec
esp/tunnel/10.2.0.2-10.2.0.1/require;
spdadd 0.0.0.0/0 10.2.0.2/32 any -P out ipsec
esp/tunnel/10.2.0.1-10.2.0.2/require;
Also, the output of 'tcpdump' on both ndis0 and fxp0, while you try to
browse a website from the XP box, could be very enlightening.
Rega
1 - 100 of 290 matches
Mail list logo
