On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Adrian Minta wrote:
> After looking in the mpd log file I found out that this message appear
> when calls are dropped:
> Jul 3 21:21:21 lns mpd: Daemon overloaded, ignoring request.
> Jul 3 21:21:22 lns mpd: Daemon overloaded, ignoring request.
> Jul 3 21:21:23 l
2011/5/2 Bernhard Schmidt :
> On Sunday, May 01, 2011 23:36:56 Brandon Gooch wrote:
>> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Bernhard Schmidt
>> wrote:
>> > On Sunday 01 May 2011 13:19:30 Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I fin
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Sunday 01 May 2011 13:19:30 Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I finally managed to get the 11n bits for iwn(4) sorted out. Well,
>> there is still an issue somewhere with HT40 frame protection or
>> TX chain setup on 5000 adapters, re
2011/4/11 Mike Tancsa :
> On 4/11/2011 1:49 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:34:56AM +0200, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote:
>> P> > Use command "vmstat -z|egrep 'ITEM|NetGraph'" and check FAILURES column.
>> P> > If you see non-zero values there, you need to increase netgraph memor
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Steve Polyack wrote:
> On 04/01/11 10:16, Frederique Rijsdijk wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We (hosting provider) are in the process of implementing ipv6 in our
>> network (yay). Yesterday one of the final steps in configuring and updating
>> our core routers were taken, w
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Missed packets just mean that some temporary resource shortage or error
> caused
> the packet to be dropped. I don't believe this is indicative of a problem,
> just let it
> keep running, 2 days is good but 2 weeks is better :)
>
> Thanks for tes
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Arnaud.
> You wrote 2 марта 2011 г., 9:55:50:
>
I have been running with 7.2.2 and so far so good. However, its hard to
say in my case as the box I would only periodically see the issue.
>>> As I wrote to Jack, my NIC hang
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 07:45:40PM +, Bruce Cran wrote:
>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 13:40:57 -0600
>> Brandon Gooch wrote:
>>
>> > BTW, if you give your devices descriptions, libpcap
>> > starts to be
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Bruce Cran wrote:
> I installed wireshark on my 9-CURRENT machine yesterday and found that
> the interface description fields are all set to 0xa5. From reading the
> code it looks like the data is being fetched via pcap.
>
> Device: usbus1
> Description: \xa5\xa5\x
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> I've never seen a trace like this, and no absolutely nothing about dummynet,
> sorry.
> If it is in some way em's fault, then making sure you have the latest code
> would be
> a good idea. I have a test driver that is under selective test, it do
2011/2/19 Pawel Tyll :
> Hi guys, lists,
>
> It's me, the bi-weekly panic guy. Guess what, it crashed today. As an
> act of desperation I disabled the pipe dumping script after previous
> crash, which today turned out to be merely a coincidence and didn't
> prevent panics. (I thought it to be a lon
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Pawel Tyll wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011, Brandon Gooch wrote:
>> It's likely that the mbuf handling problem (in em_refresh_mbufs()) is
>> triggered by the processing you're doing with ipfw (or elsewhere for
>> that matter), so, y
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 07:35:30PM +0100, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
>> > > I'm seeing the same problem with Broadcom NetXtreme (bce) cards:
>> > >
>> > > bce0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x03421014 chip=0x164c14e4
>> > > rev=0x12
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Pawel Tyll wrote:
> One more question tough,
>
> I have 4 identical machines, also with em-driven NICs - yet this is
> the only one that dies like this. OTOH Other machines don't do traffic
> shaping and do not use ipfw that extensively. Does this match your
> theo
2011/1/6 Pawel Tyll :
> Hi lists,
>
> I've reported this problem:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152360
>
> and ever since 8.1-RELEASE this machine keeps panicking every two weeks
> or so. Any help will be much appreciated. I'll be happy to provide any
> more info to help tracking thi
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently received some complains about the infamous 'ifconfig scan hang'
> issue again. Finally looking into that I noticed a bunch of inconsistences,
> the most obvious one is that ifconfig(8) is talking about doing a background
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
>> VS>I, probably, was to verbose, and didn't make myself clear enough. For now,
>> VS>from network admin point of view, it's 3 problems:
>> VS>1) No ARP support
>
> The ARP table should be there. It may be that it got 'lost' with the ARP
> ch
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Max Laier wrote:
> On 18.10.2010 20:16, Brandon Gooch wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Ermal Luçi wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> the link http://people.freebsd.org/~eri/pf45_1.diff has the patch for
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Ermal Luçi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the link http://people.freebsd.org/~eri/pf45_1.diff has the patch for
> pf(4) as of OpenBSD 4.5 version.
> The patch is against HEAD.
> After OpenBSD 4.5 the syntax has changed and this is the reason for
> such an 'old' version patch.
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Li, Qing wrote:
> There are a couple of items I need to take care of
> in this area, including the documentation, so I will get
> it done this weekend.
>
> --Qing
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
>> n.
2010/10/6 Alexey Dokuchaev :
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:19:25PM +0100, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
>> In contrast to 6.2-RELEASE, monitor mode does not work. Kismet does
>> not receive anything, while it does with ath or ural (even at the same
>> time). dmesg with debug.iwi=2 is below -- anything
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR kern/146792; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Kurt Jaeger
> To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, n...@gtelecom.ru
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: kern/146792: [flowtable] flowcleaner 100% cpu's core load
> Date: Sun, 23 M
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Jacques Fourie
wrote:
> It seems as if the m_copymdata() function defined in uipc_mbuf.c has a
> bug. It uses m_apply to copy data from the source mbuf to the target
> but in the callback function m_bcopyxxx() the arguments are
> interpreted in the wrong order. Swa
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Lin Jui-Nan Eric wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
> wrote:
>>
>> What FreeBSD version? uname -a output please.
>>
> I have tried 7.2-R and 8.0-R. Both version stalls, too.
>
> 8.0-RELEASE:
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD bsd8 8.0-RELEASE-p2 Free
Are there plans to update the documentation regarding multiple routing tables?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-routing.html
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
T
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR kern/140036; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Benjamin Kaduk
> To: Bernhard Schmidt , s...@freebsd.org
> Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: kern/140036: [iwn] [lor] lock order reversal with iw
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Bernhard Schmidt
wrote:
> On Sunday 25 October 2009 10:24:06 Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> On Saturday 24 October 2009 21:41:39 Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
>> > Just wanted to make everyone aware that OpenBSD just 1 hour ago commited
>> > a bunch of changes to their iwn dr
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Bernhard Schmidt
wrote:
> On Sunday 25 October 2009 10:24:06 Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> On Saturday 24 October 2009 21:41:39 Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
>> > Just wanted to make everyone aware that OpenBSD just 1 hour ago commited
>> > a bunch of changes to their iwn dr
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Bernhard Schmidt
wrote:
> On Thursday 15 October 2009 08:15:57 Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> .. anyways, I'll post updates on sunday.
>
> Here we go.
>
> http://techwires.net/~bschmidt/patches/freebsd/iwn/
>
> Testers/feedback welcome!
>
> Code is pretty stable altho
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Bernhard Schmidt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just to let you know, I started working on that myself and was finally able to
> get a connection and make traffic yesterday :) I'm still having issues
> scanning
> 5Ghz channels though.. anyways, I'll post updates on sunday.
>
>
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Daniel Roethlisberger wrote:
> Lawrence Stewart 2009-10-14:
>> Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> > On Friday 09 October 2009 19:08:39 Lutz Bichler wrote:
>> > > does anybody know what happened to the attempts to support
>> > > Intel WiFi 5100/5300 interfaces in the iwn-
31 matches
Mail list logo
