I am laughing so hard that I had to open some windows to get more oxygen!
On Friday, August 14, 2015 1:30 PM, Maxim Sobolev
wrote:
Hi guys, unfortunately no, neither reduction of the number of queues from 8
to 6 nor pinning interrupt rate at 2 per queue have not made any
differ
s the pps at 50% cpu usage" is a better question to ask than the one
you're asking.
BC
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 9:29 PM, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net
wrote:
Wow, this is really important! if this is a college project, I give you a D.
Maybe a D- because it's a
Wow, this is really important! if this is a college project, I give you a D.
Maybe a D- because it's almost useless information.
You ignore the most important aspect of "performance". Efficiency is arguably
the most important aspect of performance.
1M pps at 20% cpu usage is much better "perform
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 4:28 PM, Kevin Oberman
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net <
freebsd-net@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 2:19 AM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé <
> oliv...@cochard.me>
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 2:19 AM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:15 AM, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net <
freebsd-net@freebsd.org> wrote:
> What's the point of all of this gobbledygook anyway? Seriously, 99% of the
> world needs a d
What's the point of all of this gobbledygook anyway? Seriously, 99% of the
world needs a driver that passes packets in the most efficient way, and every
time I look at igb and ixgbe it has another 2 heads. It's up to 8 heads, and
none of the things wrong with it have been fixed. This is now even
Are you NOT SHARP ENOUGH to understand that my proposal DOESN'T USE THE NETWORK
STACK? OMFG
Julien, perhaps if people weren't so hostile towards commercial companies
providing ideas for alternative ways of doing things you'd get more input and
more help. Why would I want to help these people?
BC
ding” to break
IPSEC?
Why, in 2015, does anyone think it’s acceptable that the setkey(8) man page
documents, of all things, DES-CBC and HMAC-MD5 for a SA? That’s some kind of
sick joke, right?
This completely flies in the face of RFC 4835.
> On May 4, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Barney Cordoba via
to do something that he recommends to be
done with netmap.
BC
On Monday, May 4, 2015 11:52 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
On Mon, 4 May 2015 15:29:13 +, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net wrote:
> It's not faster than "wedging" into the if_input()s. It simply can't
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net <
freebsd-net@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Frankly I'm baffled by netmap. You can easily write a loadable kernel
> module that moves packets from 1 interface to another and hook in the
> firewall
Frankly I'm baffled by netmap. You can easily write a loadable kernel module
that moves packets from 1 interface to another and hook in the firewall; why
would you want to bring them up into user space? It's 1000s of lines of
unnecessary code.
On Sunday, May 3, 2015 3:10 AM, Raimundo S
s the reason that linux
sucks but everyone uses it? 10 years later, some old brain dead mentality.
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 2:49 PM, John-Mark Gurney
wrote:
Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net wrote this message on Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 06:24
-0700:
> Ok. It was a lot more convenient whe
It's not an either/or. Until last July there was both. Like F'ing Intel isn't
making enough money to pay someone to maintain a FreeBSD version.
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 2:24 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2014, at 8:24, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net
>
seamlessly.
Negative Progress is inevitable.
BC
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 9:57 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 8/12/2014 9:16 PM, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net wrote:
> I notice that there hasn't been an update in the Intel Download Center since
> July. Is there no official sup
I notice that there hasn't been an update in the Intel Download Center since
July. Is there no official support for 10?
We liked to use the intel stuff as an alternative to the "latest" freebsd code,
but it doesnt compile.
BC
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.
Didn't read down far enough. There are def issues and gains are probably
mostly in a lab with 9k frames. Turn it off. CPUs and buses are fast.
BC
On Sep 10, 2013, at 6:52 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 9/10/2013 6:42 PM, Barney Cordoba wrote:
>> NFS has been broken since Day
NFS has been broken since Day 1, so lets not come to conclusions about anything
as it relates to NFS.
BC
From: Mike Tancsa
To: Rick Macklem
Cc: FreeBSD Net ; David Wolfskill
Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 11:26 AM
Subject: TSO help or hindrance ? (was
s cleaner and more easily maintained.
BC
From: Adrian Chadd
To: Barney Cordoba
Cc: Andre Oppermann ; Alan Somers ;
"n...@freebsd.org" ; Jack F Vogel ; Justin
T. Gibbs ; Luigi Rizzo ; T.C. Gubatayao
Sent: Sunday, September 1, 2013 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: Fl
ur bus capacity; the answer is to not run PCIe2 if you need pcie3. You
can use it internally if you have
control of all of the machines. When I modify a driver the first thing that I
do is rip it out.
BC
____
From: Luigi Rizzo
To: Barney Cordoba
Cc: Andre
rong with OOO packets. We had this discussion
before; lots of people
have round robin dual homing without any ill effects. It's just not an issue.
BC
____
From: T.C. Gubatayao
To: Barney Cordoba ; Luigi Rizzo
; Alan Somers
Cc: Jack F Vogel ; Justin T.
That's way too high. Your base rx requirement is
Ports * queues * rxd
With a quad card you shouldn't be using more than 2 queues, so your requirement
with 5 ports is 10,240 just for the receive setup. If you're using 4 queues that
number doubles, which would make 25,600 not enough.
Note that
And another thing; the use of modulo is very expensive when the number of ports
used in LAGG is *usually* a power of 2. foo&(SLOTS-1) is a lot faster than
(foo%SLOTS).
if (SLOTS == 2 || SLOTS == 4 || SLOTS == 8)
hash = hash&(SLOTS-1);
else
hash = hash % SLOTS;
is more than twice as fast
May I express my glee and astonishment that you're debating the use of
complicated hash functions
for something that's likely to have from 2-8 slots?
Also, the *most* important thing is distribution with realistic data. The goal
should be to use the
most trivial function that gives the most bal
From: Andre Oppermann
To: Adrian Chadd
Cc: Barney Cordoba ; Luigi Rizzo
; "freebsd-net@freebsd.org"
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: it's the output, not ack coalescing (Re: TSO and FreeBSD vs Linux)
On 18.08.201
From: Luigi Rizzo
To: Barney Cordoba
Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" ; Adrian Chadd
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: it's the output, not ack coalescing (Re: TSO and FreeBSD vs Linux)
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:01 PM,
Criticism is the bedrock of innovation.
From: Vijay Singh
To: Barney Cordoba
Cc: Adrian Chadd ; "freebsd-net@freebsd.org"
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: it's the output, not ack coalescing (Re: TSO and FreeBSD vs Linux)
an a kludge in the first place.
BC
From: Adrian Chadd
To: Barney Cordoba
Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org"
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: it's the output, not ack coalescing (Re: TSO and FreeBSD vs Linux)
On 18 Aug
Great. Never has the been a better explanation for the word Kludge than netmap.
From: Adrian Chadd
To: Jim Thompson
Cc: Barney Cordoba ; FreeBSD Net ;
Luigi Rizzo ; Lawrence Stewart
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: it's the output
From: Adrian Chadd
To: Barney Cordoba
Cc: Luigi Rizzo ; Lawrence Stewart ;
FreeBSD Net
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2013 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: it's the output, not ack coalescing (Re: TSO and FreeBSD vs Linux)
... we get perfectly good throu
>>EFFICIENCY is tantamount. Throughput is almost always a tuning issue.
Of course I meant paramount. Coffee matters :-|
From: Luigi Rizzo
To: Lawrence Stewart
Cc: FreeBSD Net
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 6:21 AM
Subject: it's the output, not ack coales
Horsehockey. What are you guys running with, P4s?
Modern cpus are magnificently fast. The triviality of lookups is a non-issue
in almost all cases. The ability of modern cpus to fill a transmit queue faster
than the data can be transmitted is incontrovertible.
With TCP you have windows and thing
You can create your own pipeline with some minor modifications. Why wait months
for the guys who did it wrong to make changes?
BC
From: Adrian Chadd
To: Barney Cordoba
Cc: Zaphod Beeblebrox ; Freddie Cash ;
Steve Read ; freebsd-net
Sent: Saturday, August
The stock igb driver binds to all cores, so with multiple igbs you have multiple
nics binding to the same cores. I suppose that might create issues in a lagg
setup.
Try 1 queue and/or comment out the bind code.
BC
From: Zaphod Beeblebrox
To: Freddie Cash
Cc
From: Sean Bruno
To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org"
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: bce(4) panics, 9.2rc1 [redux]
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 14:07 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> Running 9.2 in production load mail servers. We're hitting the
> "watchd
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Barney Cordoba
wrote about Re: Recommendations for 10gbps NIC:
BC> I don't really understand why nearly all 10GBE cards are dual-port.
BC> Surely there is a market for NICs between 1 gigabit and 20 gigabit.
Myricom has single port 10G cards.
From: Alexander V. Chernikov
To: Barney Cordoba
Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" ; Daniel Feenberg
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 4:02 AM
Subject: Re: Recommendations for 10gbps NIC
On 27.07.2013 02:14, Barney Cor
From: Luigi Rizzo
To: Alexander V. Chernikov
Cc: Barney Cordoba ; Daniel Feenberg
; "freebsd-net@freebsd.org"
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 4:15 AM
Subject: Re: Recommendations for 10gbps NIC
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Alexander V.
From: Daniel Feenberg
To: Alexander V. Chernikov
Cc: Barney Cordoba ; "freebsd-net@freebsd.org"
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: Recommendations for 10gbps NIC
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> On 26.
From: Alexander V. Chernikov
To: Boris Kochergin
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: Recommendations for 10gbps NIC
On 25.07.2013 00:26, Boris Kochergin wrote:
> Hi.
Hello.
>
> I am looking for recommendations f
I wasn't referring to science projects. Nor did I say it wasn't useful.
Only that 10g is cheap now and quite a bit better. LAGG isn't perfect.
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Chadd
To: Barney Cordoba
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; isp
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2013 9:49
On Sat, 7/20/13, isp wrote:
Subject: LACP LAGG device problems
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Saturday, July 20, 2013, 10:04 AM
Hi! Can anybody tell me, is there any plans to improve
LAGG(802.3ad)
device driver in FreeBSD?
It will be
On Tue, 7/16/13, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Subject: Re: FreeBSD router problems
To: "Barney Cordoba"
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Tuesday, July 16, 2013, 1:10 AM
On 15.07.2013 22:04, Barney Cordoba
wrote:
> Also, IP frag
On Sun, 7/14/13, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Subject: Re: FreeBSD router problems
To: "Barney Cordoba"
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "isp"
Date: Sunday, July 14, 2013, 1:17 PM
On 14.07.2013 23:14, Barney Cordoba
wrote:
>
On Sun, 7/14/13, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Subject: Re: FreeBSD router problems
To: "Barney Cordoba"
Cc: "isp" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Sunday, July 14, 2013, 1:17 PM
On 14.07.2013 23:14, Barney Cordoba
wrote:
>
So why not get a real 10gb/s card? RJ45 10gig is here,
and it works a lot better than LAGG.
If you want to get more than 1Gb/s on a single connection,
you'd need to use roundrobin, which will alternate packets
without concern for ordering. Purists will argue against it,
but it does work and moder
On Mon, 7/1/13, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
Subject: Re: Inconsistent NIC behavior
To: "Barney Cordoba"
Date: Monday, July 1, 2013, 7:38 PM
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at
12:04 PM, Barney Cordoba
wrote:
One
particular annoyance with
One particular annoyance with Freebsd is that different NICs have different
dormant behavior.
For example em and igb both will show the link being active or not on boot
whether the interface
has been UPed or not, while ixgbe and bce do not.
I think it's a worthy goal to have NICs work the same
--- On Thu, 6/20/13, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> From: Andre Oppermann
> Subject: Re: hw.igb.num_queues default
> To: "Eugene Grosbein"
> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , "Eggert, Lars" ,
"Jack Vogel"
> Date: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 10:29 AM
> On 20.06.2013 15:37, Eugene Grosbein
> wrote:
> > On
gt; +0430, Hooman Fazaeli wrote:
> > On 5/21/2013 5:10 PM, Barney Cordoba wrote:
> > >
> > > --- On Tue, 5/21/13, liujie
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> From: liujie
> > >> Subject: Re: netmap bridge can tranmit big
> packet in line rate ?
> &
--- On Tue, 5/21/13, liujie wrote:
> From: liujie
> Subject: Re: netmap bridge can tranmit big packet in line rate ?
> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2013, 5:25 AM
> Hi, Prof.Luigi RIZZO
>
> Firstly i should thank you for netmap. I tried to send a
> e-mail to you
> y
tuning doc as much as anything else.
BC
--- On Sat, 5/11/13, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> From: Adrian Chadd
> Subject: Re: High CPU interrupt load on intel I350T4 with igb on 8.3
> To: "Hooman Fazaeli"
> Cc: "Barney Cordoba" , ""Clément Hermann (nodens)&quo
--- On Sat, 5/11/13, Hooman Fazaeli wrote:
> From: Hooman Fazaeli
> Subject: Re: High CPU interrupt load on intel I350T4 with igb on 8.3
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: "Eugene Grosbein" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, ""Clément
> Hermann (nodens)"
--- On Fri, 5/10/13, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> From: Eugene Grosbein
> Subject: Re: High CPU interrupt load on intel I350T4 with igb on 8.3
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, ""Clément Hermann (nodens)""
>
> Date: Fri
--- On Thu, 5/9/13, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> From: Eugene Grosbein
> Subject: Re: High CPU interrupt load on intel I350T4 with igb on 8.3
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: ""Clément Hermann (nodens)"" ,
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Thurs
--- On Thu, 5/9/13, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> From: Eugene Grosbein
> Subject: Re: High CPU interrupt load on intel I350T4 with igb on 8.3
> To: ""Clément Hermann (nodens)""
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Thursday, May 9, 2013, 10:55 AM
> On 26.04.2013 18:31, "Clément
> Hermann (nodens)
--- On Sun, 4/28/13, Barney Cordoba wrote:
> From: Barney Cordoba
> Subject: Re: High CPU interrupt load on intel I350T4 with igb on 8.3
> To: "Jack Vogel"
> Cc: "FreeBSD Net" , "Clément Hermann (nodens)"
>
> Date: Sunday, April 28, 201
--- On Tue, 4/30/13, w...@sourcearmory.com wrote:
> From: w...@sourcearmory.com
> Subject: Capture packets before kernel process
> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Tuesday, April 30, 2013, 11:24 AM
> Hi!
>
> I need some help, currently I'm working in a project where I
> want to capture and
ings that may improve ordegrade
performance depending on the workload.
Jack
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Barney Cordoba
wrote:
--- On Fri, 4/26/13, "Clément Hermann (nodens)" wrote:
> From: "Clément Hermann (nodens)"
> Subject: High CPU interrupt load o
--- On Fri, 4/26/13, "Clément Hermann (nodens)" wrote:
> From: "Clément Hermann (nodens)"
> Subject: High CPU interrupt load on intel I350T4 with igb on 8.3
> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Friday, April 26, 2013, 7:31 AM
> Hi list,
>
> We use pf+ALTQ for trafic shaping on some routers.
--- On Fri, 4/26/13, Erich Weiler wrote:
> From: Erich Weiler
> Subject: Re: pf performance?
> To: "Andre Oppermann"
> Cc: "Paul Tatarsky" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Friday, April 26, 2013, 12:04 PM
> >> But the work pf does would
> show up in 'system' on top right? So if I
> >> see al
--- On Tue, 4/2/13, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> From: Adrian Chadd
> Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
> To: "Nick Rogers"
> Cc: "Karim Fodil-Lemelin" ,
> "freebsd-net@freebsd.org"
> Date: Tuesday, April 2, 2013, 6:39 PM
> Yes:
>
> * you need to add it to conf/options - see if there's an
> op
ty as to how to make the
driver better is particularly troubling. So I just have to recommend that
igb cards not be used for production flows, because there is little hope
that it will improve any time soon.
BC
--- On Sun, 3/31/13, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> From: Adrian Chadd
> Subject: Re:
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> From: Adrian Chadd
> Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
> To: "Nick Rogers"
> Cc: "Pieper, Jeffrey E" ,
> "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , "Clement Hermann
> (nodens)" , "Jack Vogel"
> Date: Friday, March 29, 2013, 1:10 PM
> On 29 March 2013 10:04, N
ng? Something new to play with?
I'm guessing that you have no idea.
BC--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Jack Vogel wrote:
From: Jack Vogel
Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
To: "Pieper, Jeffrey E"
Cc: "Barney Cordoba" , "Nick Rogers"
, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org"
developer would do.
Or are you just hurling insults because you're devoid of actual ideas?
BC
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Scott Long wrote:
> From: Scott Long
> Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: "Nick Rogers" , "Adrian Chad
it needs a lot more than a patch. It needs to be completely re-thunk
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Adrian Chadd wrote:
From: Adrian Chadd
Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
To: "Barney Cordoba"
Cc: "Jack Vogel" , "Nick Rogers" ,
"Jeffrey EPieper" , "
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Pieper, Jeffrey E wrote:
> From: Pieper, Jeffrey E
> Subject: RE: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
> To: "Barney Cordoba" , "Jack Vogel"
> , "Nick Rogers"
> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , "Clement He
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Pieper, Jeffrey E wrote:
> From: Pieper, Jeffrey E
> Subject: RE: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
> To: "Barney Cordoba" , "Jack Vogel"
> , "Nick Rogers"
> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , "Clement He
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Pablo Ribalta Lorenzo wrote:
> From: Pablo Ribalta Lorenzo
> Subject: vlan with modified MAC fails to communicate
> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Friday, March 29, 2013, 7:53 AM
> Hi there!
>
> Lately I've been investigating an issue that I would like to
> share, as
--- On Thu, 3/28/13, Nick Rogers wrote:
> From: Nick Rogers
> Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
> To: "Jack Vogel"
> Cc: "Barney Cordoba" , "Clement Hermann (nodens)"
> , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org"
> Date: Thursday, March 28, 201
--- On Mon, 3/4/13, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> From: Zaphod Beeblebrox
> Subject: Re: igb network lockups
> To: "Jack Vogel"
> Cc: "Nick Rogers" , "Sepherosa Ziehau"
> , "Christopher D. Harrison" ,
> "freebsd-net@freebsd.org"
> Date: Monday, March 4, 2013, 1:58 PM
> For everyone having loc
--- On Mon, 3/4/13, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> From: Zaphod Beeblebrox
> Subject: Re: igb network lockups
> To: "Jack Vogel"
> Cc: "Nick Rogers" , "Sepherosa Ziehau"
> , "Christopher D. Harrison" ,
> "freebsd-net@freebsd.org"
> Date: Monday, March 4, 2013, 1:58 PM
> For everyone having loc
--- On Mon, 2/25/13, Christopher D. Harrison wrote:
> From: Christopher D. Harrison
> Subject: Re: igb network lockups
> To: "Jack Vogel"
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Monday, February 25, 2013, 1:38 PM
> Sure,
> The problem appears on both systems running with ALTQ and
> vanilla.
>
--- On Fri, 1/18/13, John Baldwin wrote:
> From: John Baldwin
> Subject: Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()
> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Cc: "Barney Cordoba" , "Adrian Chadd"
> , "Luigi Rizzo"
> Date: Friday, January
--- On Fri, 1/18/13, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> From: Adrian Chadd
> Subject: Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Luigi Rizzo"
> Date: Friday, January 18, 2013, 3:09 PM
> On 1
--- On Fri, 1/18/13, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> From: Luigi Rizzo
> Subject: Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: "Adrian Chadd" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Friday, January 18, 2013, 9:59 AM
> On F
> the problem i was actually seeing are slightly different,
> namely:
> - once the driver lags behind, it does not have a chance to
> recover
> even if there are CPU cycles available, because both
> interrupt
> rate and packets per interrupt are capped.
> - much worse, once the input stream s
--- On Thu, 1/17/13, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> From: Adrian Chadd
> Subject: Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()
> To: "Luigi Rizzo"
> Cc: "Barney Cordoba" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Thursday, January 17, 2013, 2:04 PM
>
--- On Thu, 1/17/13, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> From: Adrian Chadd
> Subject: Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: "Luigi Rizzo" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Thursday, January 17, 2013, 11:48 AM
> There
--- On Thu, 1/17/13, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> From: Adrian Chadd
> Subject: Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: "Luigi Rizzo" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Thursday, January 17, 2013, 11:48 AM
> There
--- On Wed, 1/16/13, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> From: Luigi Rizzo
> Subject: Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Wednesday, January 16, 2013, 9:55 PM
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 06:19:
--- On Tue, 1/15/13, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> From: Luigi Rizzo
> Subject: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()
> To: h...@freebsd.org, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org"
> Cc: "Jack Vogel"
> Date: Tuesday, January 15, 2013, 8:23 PM
> Hi,
> i found a couple of problems in
>
> dev
--- On Wed, 1/9/13, Barney Cordoba wrote:
> From: Barney Cordoba
> Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP
> To: "Mark Atkinson"
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 1:08 PM
>
>
> --- On Tue, 1/8/13, Mark Atkinson
> wrote:
>
--- On Tue, 1/8/13, Mark Atkinson wrote:
> From: Mark Atkinson
> Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP
> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Tuesday, January 8, 2013, 11:29 AM
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/07/2013 18:25, Barney Cordoba wrote
--- On Wed, 1/9/13, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> From: sth...@nethelp.no
> Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP
> To: erichsfreebsdl...@alogt.com
> Cc: barney_cord...@yahoo.com, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, jack.vo...@gmail.com,
> atkin...@gmail.com
> Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 9:32 AM
> > > 4B
--- On Wed, 1/9/13, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> From: Erich Dollansky
> Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: "Mark Atkinson" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org,
> jack.vo...@gmail.com
> Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 9:14 AM
> Hi,
&g
inson
> wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 01/07/2013 18:25, Barney Cordoba wrote:
> > > I have a situation where I have to run 9.1 on an
> old single core
> > > box. Does anyone have a handle on whether
--- On Tue, 1/8/13, Ian Smith wrote:
> From: Ian Smith
> Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP
> To: "Garrett Cooper"
> Cc: "Barney Cordoba" , "Erich Dollansky"
> , freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Tuesday, January 8, 2013, 11:34 AM
> On Tue
--- On Mon, 1/7/13, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> From: Erich Dollansky
> Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Monday, January 7, 2013, 10:56 PM
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 18:25:58 -0800 (PST)
> Bar
--- On Mon, 1/7/13, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> From: Garrett Cooper
> Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Monday, January 7, 2013, 9:38 PM
> On Jan 7, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Barney
> Cordoba wrote:
>
>
I have a situation where I have to run 9.1 on an old single core box. Does
anyone have a handle on whether it's better to build a non SMP kernel or to
just use a standard SMP build with just the one core? Thanks.
BC
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing
--- On Mon, 1/7/13, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> From: Willem Jan Withagen
> Subject: Re: kern/174851: [bxe] [patch] UDP checksum offload is wrong in bxe
> driver
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: "Garrett Cooper" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Adrian
--- On Fri, 1/4/13, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> From: Willem Jan Withagen
> Subject: Re: kern/174851: [bxe] [patch] UDP checksum offload is wrong in bxe
> driver
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: "Garrett Cooper" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Adrian
--- On Mon, 12/31/12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> From: Adrian Chadd
> Subject: Re: kern/174851: [bxe] [patch] UDP checksum offload is wrong in bxe
> driver
> To: "Garrett Cooper"
> Cc: "Barney Cordoba" , "David Christensen"
> , lini...@fre
--- On Mon, 12/31/12, lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
> From: lini...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: kern/174851: [bxe] [patch] UDP checksum offload is wrong in bxe
> driver
> To: lini...@freebsd.org, freebsd-b...@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
> Date: Monday, December 31, 2012, 2:28 AM
> Old Sy
; On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Barney Cordoba
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> --- On Tue, 12/11/12, Gleb Smirnoff
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> From: Gleb Smirnoff
> >>> Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
> >>> To: "Jack
--- On Tue, 12/11/12, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> From: Gleb Smirnoff
> Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
> To: "Jack Vogel"
> Cc: "Clement Hermann (nodens)" , "Barney Cordoba"
> , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
> Date: Tuesday, December 11, 2012, 2:58
--- On Mon, 12/10/12, Clément Hermann (nodens) wrote:
> From: Clément Hermann (nodens)
> Subject: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Monday, December 10, 2012, 6:03 AM
> Hi there,
>
> I'm trying to install a new pf/altq router. I needed to use
> 9.1-rc3 due to
> RAI
--- On Thu, 12/6/12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> From: Adrian Chadd
> Subject: Re: Latency issues with buf_ring
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Robert Watson"
> Date: Thursday, December 6, 2012, 1:31 PM
> There've been plenty of
--- On Thu, 12/6/12, Robert Watson wrote:
> From: Robert Watson
> Subject: Re: Latency issues with buf_ring
> To: "Andre Oppermann"
> Cc: "Barney Cordoba" , "Adrian Chadd"
> , "John Baldwin" ,
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Th
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
