Great. Never has the been a better explanation for the word Kludge than netmap.
________________________________ From: Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> To: Jim Thompson <j...@netgate.com> Cc: Barney Cordoba <barney_cord...@yahoo.com>; FreeBSD Net <n...@freebsd.org>; Luigi Rizzo <ri...@iet.unipi.it>; Lawrence Stewart <lstew...@freebsd.org> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 11:57 AM Subject: Re: it's the output, not ack coalescing (Re: TSO and FreeBSD vs Linux) Right. Well, post some profiling data, let's figure this out sometime. Luigi can do bridging with 2 cores using netmap. So it's technically possible. There's just a lot of kernel gunk in the way of doing it ye olde way. -adrian On 18 August 2013 07:25, Jim Thompson <j...@netgate.com> wrote: > > On Aug 18, 2013, at 8:48 AM, Barney Cordoba <barney_cord...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > I could fill a tx queue with 10gb of traffic with yesteryear's cpus. > It's not an achievement. Being able to bridge > > real traffic at 10gb/s with 2 cores is > > Or forward at layer 3. > > Or filter packets. > > Or IPSEC. > > Or... _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
