>
> a picture would do wonders to understand what he wants.
Apologies for being AWOL
Attaching an image link: https://ibb.co/nt1s4S
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 8:39 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 1/5/18 11:16 pm, Freddie Cash wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 6:08 AM, Julian Elischer
> wrote:
>
>
> If you want to think of it in switch terms, FreeBSD supports access ports
> (untagged vlan) and trunk ports (tagged vlans). But there's no support for
> hybrid ports (tagged vlans with a PVID on the port that adds tags to
> untagged traffic).
>
> What you are trying to do is create a hybrid por
nd vlan2 tagged 10 on igb1
Next i create bridge0, assign vlan1 and vlan2 (no IPs on either the bridge,
physical interface on VLANs)? PCs connected with igb0 and igb1 have
similar IP config (e.g 192.168.10.1 and 192.168.10.2)
Am i correct?
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Eugene Grosbein wro
>
> You are still ignoring requests to not top-post and I'm getting tired to
> fix it for you.
> I may just stop responding.
>
Apologies again, last i thought i had replied to all after your first
pointing out😷
If you really want to bridge 802.1q trunks, you should be stating so from
> the beginn
So it is not possible to replicate behaviour of standard L2 switches using
freebsd where we have different VLANs, access and trunk ports?
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 9:16 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 27.04.2018 22:57, Abdullah Tariq wrote:
>
> > And please do not top-post and reply
is this the right way?
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 8:52 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 27.04.2018 21:39, Abdullah Tariq wrote:
>
> > > No, i am trying to bridge untagged frames between vlans of these
> interfaces. Is it doable?
> >
> > Sure. If you need to accept u
I am trying to make 2 systems connected to freebsd box directly to be able
to communicated with each other. Explanation diagram is attached
ifconfig vlan2 create vlan 5 vlandev igb5
ifconfig vlan3 create vlan 5 vlandev igb6
ifconfig bridge10 create addm vlan2 addm vlan3 up
as explained to me on
