So it is not possible to replicate behaviour of standard L2 switches using freebsd where we have different VLANs, access and trunk ports?
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 9:16 PM, Eugene Grosbein <eu...@grosbein.net> wrote: > 27.04.2018 22:57, Abdullah Tariq wrote: > > > And please do not top-post and reply to the list, not privately. > Thank you. > > > > sorry for that. > > > > > > They do but that's not what you need. You deal with untagged frames > on igb5, > > so do not create any vlan on top on igb5 but use it directly: > > ifconfig bridge10 create addm igb5 addm vlan3 up > > > > > > so if i need 2 ports with same vlan tags to communicate with each other > > i create 2 bridges > > ifconfig vlan2 create vlan 5 vlandev igb5 > > ifconfig vlan3 create vlan 5 vlandev igb6 > > ifconfig bridge10 create addm igb5 addm vlan3 up > > ifconfig bridge11 create addm igb6 addm vlan2 up > > > > is this the right way? > > No. If you have two ports that should carry untagged frames and form > single vlan > and this vlan has no other ports carrying tagged frames, then > this vlan effectively has *no* tag number, or better say, its tag number > does not matter. > > In that case, do not create any vlan interfaces for the vlan at all but > bridge ports directly: > > ifconfig bridge10 addm igb5 addm igb6 > > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
