>
> a picture would do wonders to understand what he wants.
Apologies for being AWOL
Attaching an image link: https://ibb.co/nt1s4S
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 8:39 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 1/5/18 11:16 pm, Freddie Cash wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 6:08 AM, Julian Elischer
> wrote:
>
>and read this:
>https://people.freebsd.org/~julian/netgraph.htm
<https://people.freebsd.org/~julian/netgraph.html>
Will look into it too, thanks Julian.
Regards
Abdullah
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018, 21:41 Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 28/4/18 8:28 pm, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
erface on VLANs)? PCs connected with igb0 and igb1 have
similar IP config (e.g 192.168.10.1 and 192.168.10.2)
> Am i correct?
>Yes.
Sorry for duplicate post.
Will test it out tomorrow, thanks.
Regards
Abdullah
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018, 21:25 Abdullah wrote:
> Yes.
>
> Regards
> Abdu
Yes.
Regards
Abdullah
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018, 00:50 Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 28.04.2018 20:16, Abdullah Tariq wrote:
>
> > Sorry but getting a little confused here.
> > Lets say i have 2 interfaces igb0, igb1 and i want them to have tagged
> traffic.
> > I create vlan
>
> If you want to think of it in switch terms, FreeBSD supports access ports
> (untagged vlan) and trunk ports (tagged vlans). But there's no support for
> hybrid ports (tagged vlans with a PVID on the port that adds tags to
> untagged traffic).
>
> What you are trying to do is create a hybrid por
nd vlan2 tagged 10 on igb1
Next i create bridge0, assign vlan1 and vlan2 (no IPs on either the bridge,
physical interface on VLANs)? PCs connected with igb0 and igb1 have
similar IP config (e.g 192.168.10.1 and 192.168.10.2)
Am i correct?
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Eugene Grosbein wro
ntainn vlan2
and bridge3 should have bridge1 and bridge2?
If not, can you please give some instructions/guidelines for
ng_vlan+ng_bridge?
Thanks
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 28.04.2018 16:26, Abdullah wrote:
>
> You are still ignoring requests to not top-p
x (cumulus linux, openswitch, ONL) are doing
so, i dont see why BSD can't do it. I haven't searched much other bsd
flavors though.
Regards
Abdullah
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 13:59 Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 28.04.2018 12:49, Abdullah Tariq wrote:
>
> You still top-posting. Please don&
So it is not possible to replicate behaviour of standard L2 switches using
freebsd where we have different VLANs, access and trunk ports?
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 9:16 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 27.04.2018 22:57, Abdullah Tariq wrote:
>
> > And please do not top-post and reply
is this the right way?
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 8:52 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 27.04.2018 21:39, Abdullah Tariq wrote:
>
> > > No, i am trying to bridge untagged frames between vlans of these
> interfaces. Is it doable?
> >
> > Sure. If you need to accept u
I am trying to make 2 systems connected to freebsd box directly to be able
to communicated with each other. Explanation diagram is attached
ifconfig vlan2 create vlan 5 vlandev igb5
ifconfig vlan3 create vlan 5 vlandev igb6
ifconfig bridge10 create addm vlan2 addm vlan3 up
as explained to me on
Update:
Can't seem to create a vlan with bridge as parent either on freebsd 10.3
and 11. Get error
Siocifcreate2: protocol not supported
However had an old 8.3 vm lying around. Works fine there.
Regards
Abdullah
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, 23:42 Abdullah wrote:
> Hello
> I would like
ts as well as bridge and vlans allowing all
traffic.
Also tcpdump shows nothing whatsoever for bridge as well as vlans after
being assigned to bridge.
Regards
Abdullah
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs
The following reply was made to PR kern/112670; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Ariff Abdullah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/112670: [if_tap] stat /dev/tapN leads to panic for N >= 2G
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 05:33:48 +0800
This i
14 matches
Mail list logo
