https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248005
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback?(kp@fre |maintainer-feedback?
Hello,
I would like to know if you are interested in acquiring FreeBSD Users Contact
List.
Information fields: Names, Title, Email, Phone, Company Name, Company URL,
Company physical address, SIC Code, Industry and Specialty (Revenue and
Employee).
Let me know if you are interested and I
Marko Zec wrote this message on Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 07:49 +0200:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 07:26:22 +0200
> Marko Zec wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 16:26:25 -0700
> > John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> >
> > > I happen to be looking at the implementation of IFQ_DRV_PREPEND, and
> > > unlike IFQ_DRV_DEQU
On 10 Jul 2020, at 22:29, Kristof Provost wrote:
On 8 Jul 2020, at 12:52, Kajetan Staszkiewicz wrote:
I have forgot to mention my system: it's FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p9
I have also managed to replicate this (or a similar) issue on a test
system built with lock debugging and I got this:
Jul 8 10
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248005
Kyle Evans changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback?(kevans |maintainer-feedback+
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248005
--- Comment #2 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: kevans
Date: Thu Jul 16 13:37:32 UTC 2020
New revision: 363244
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/363244
Log:
ether_ifattach: set mtu befor
Hi,
My name is Alex Miller and I am from the Database and Lists Management
Company. I wanted to check if you are in practice of purchasing updated
database?
We can help you in reaching C-level decision makers, Business decision
makers, Healthcare Professionals and many more across the Globe.
16.07.2020 16:03, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 16.07.2020 14:57, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
>
>>> I'm sure pf is the bottle-neck. Try testing such card without any
>>> packet filter enabled and you'll see great difference definitely.
>>
>> That's not a good news as I don't see how to simplify the rule
16.07.2020 14:57, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
>> I'm sure pf is the bottle-neck. Try testing such card without any
>> packet filter enabled and you'll see great difference definitely.
>
> That's not a good news as I don't see how to simplify the ruleset :(
> But thanks anyway :)
First, you need to
On 16 Jul 2020, at 9:57, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:07:23 +0700
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Hello,
That is mostly for the record but it looks like the intel X520 is
not very good and generates a high level of interrupts.
On a router / firewall with 500 Kpps in input (dropped
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:07:23 +0700
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Hello,
> > That is mostly for the record but it looks like the intel X520 is
> > not very good and generates a high level of interrupts.
> >
> > On a router / firewall with 500 Kpps in input (dropped by pf) is
> > enough to put the CPUs
16.07.2020 14:12, lutz_donnerhacke.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) wrote:
> > ce(4) for PCI G.703/E1 card,
> > cp(4) for PCI V.35/RS-232/RS-530/RS-449/X.21/G.703/E1/E3/T3/STS-1 cards,
> > and cx(4)/ctau(4) for some ISA cards but these do not exist in FreeBSD 13
> anymore,
> > removed by emaste@ rec
12 matches
Mail list logo
