On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:07:23 +0700 Eugene Grosbein <eu...@grosbein.net> wrote:
Hello, > > That is mostly for the record but it looks like the intel X520 is > > not very good and generates a high level of interrupts. > > > > On a router / firewall with 500 Kpps in input (dropped by pf) is > > enough to put the CPUs at 100% busy. > > [skip] > > > Well, do you think another NIC cards can help to reach a better pps > > rate ? I think 500 Kpps is quite low for such a machine. > > I'm sure pf is the bottle-neck. Try testing such card without any > packet filter enabled and you'll see great difference definitely. That's not a good news as I don't see how to simplify the ruleset :( But thanks anyway :) Regards, _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
