Am 11.05.2018 um 19:26 schrieb Harry Schmalzbauer:
Bezüglich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 10.05.2018 21:17 (localtime):
Hello,
if I pull the TP connection from my i217 Clarkville, HEAD still reports
media
1000Base-T status "active".
Doing the same with the other if_em(4) NIC in that
correcting a typo:
svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src
current revision: 352434
Thank you!
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:11 PM vm finance wrote:
> Actually I am on head already as mentioned previously. Pulled it using
> yesterday:
>
> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /use/src
>
Actually I am on head already as mentioned previously. Pulled it using
yesterday:
>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /use/src
If you could pls let me know the new patch, I can try that.
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
> On 18-Sep-2019, at 8:56 AM, Randall Stewart wrote:
>
> There have be
There have been several patches pre-this one that provide
the infrastructure to support BBR.
Release 12.0 will *not* have these patches and will *not* compile it.
I have no intention at this point in doing a MFC of this work.. so if you want
to run BBR you need to run Head
R
> On Sep 17, 2019,
My Kernel config is attached here. Thanks!
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 2:26 AM vm finance wrote:
> Hi Randall,
>
> Could you please provide a pointer to the latest patch. I had applied the
> one you published Sep-10.
>
> Following is what I have done:
> 1. Picked FreeBSD 12.0 RELEASE VM from osboxes
Hi Randall,
Could you please provide a pointer to the latest patch. I had applied the
one you published Sep-10.
Following is what I have done:
1. Picked FreeBSD 12.0 RELEASE VM from osboxes.org
2. Got VM up under VMPlayer on x86 laptop
3. Checked out latest codebase from freebsd repo:
svn co svn:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233952
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-qa|
Severity|Affects Some P
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233952
--- Comment #12 from Mark Johnston ---
(In reply to Armin Gruner from comment #11)
I can't see a problem in that commit, and I haven't been able to find a
programmer reference for the jmicron controllers with a quick search. Linux
doesn't
Looking at your make file log I can’t really tell what you are doing.
Its not the BBR or Rack code that is blowing up…
Are you cross compiling?
I have done the old fashioned kernel make
i.e.
cd src/sys/amd64/config
config headvm
cd ../compile/headvm
make cleandepend ; make depend; make -j3
looking
I was at 352408.. let me update and try it
R
> On Sep 17, 2019, at 1:10 PM, Randall Stewart wrote:
>
> Hmm
>
> Did you get the patch I updated too this am?
>
> I have built it both with and without the bbr stack and had no issue.. there
> was
> an issue with KTLS before the update t
Hmm
Did you get the patch I updated too this am?
I have built it both with and without the bbr stack and had no issue.. there was
an issue with KTLS before the update though.
I don’t recognize what you have below there though…
R
> On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:47 AM, vm finance wrote:
>
> Got it -
Got it - thank you!
btw, I tried to build the patch but its giving an error. Following is SVN
info + make error mesg.
Please let me know what am I missing here?
Thanks!
#svnlite revision
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src
URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head
Relative URL: ^/head
Repositor
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233952
--- Comment #11 from Armin Gruner ---
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=316820
breaks it
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
Pacing is provided by tcp_hpts.c. The current linux patches do not have
to have fq.. they built an alternate means of doing pacing into bbr.
In either case our testing has shown that our pacing is more accurate than
either fq or the internal pacer :)
R
> On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:05 AM, vm finance
Thanks Randall.
I was able to apply the patch - now rebuilding the kernel. Would update on
how it goes.
BTW, is there any description on how lack of tc_fq under FreeBSD is
compensated here?
The original BBR patches on Linux show that as a must-have? Is that
functionality implemented via tcp_rateli
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233952
Mark Johnston changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #10
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233952
--- Comment #9 from Armin Gruner ---
> If you like, I can just revert those changes and test with a newly built
> 12-HEAD kernel..
I answer myself:
If I revert the changes in if_jme.c introduced between 11.3-RELEASE and
12.0-RELEASE, the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233952
--- Comment #8 from Armin Gruner ---
BTW I know how to compile kernels;
this box can be rebooted anytime, and I am happy to test snapshots (or build
from 12-CURRENT, any git branch/tag, I sync with
https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd.git
Af
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233952
--- Comment #7 from Armin Gruner ---
Created attachment 207577
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=207577&action=edit
pciconf -l output
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You ar
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233952
--- Comment #6 from Armin Gruner ---
Created attachment 207576
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=207576&action=edit
dmesg.boot
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233952
--- Comment #5 from Armin Gruner ---
Sure:
root@eeetop:~ # uname -a
FreeBSD eeetop 12.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE r341666 GENERIC amd64
Output of dmesg after boot and pciconf is attached;
if I remove the disables from loader.conf, pci
You should be able to compile it against the current head. I re-doing that now
(had an
issue with my machine and had to roll it back to a backup).
When I put the patch up on Sept 10th it complied with and without BBR on
whatever
was that rev..
Looking in the commit logs that would have been aro
Hi Randall,
Thanks for releasing BBR patch:
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582#change-xcAWBif3E9Jq
Could you please let me know what SVN/GIT label tag this is based on? I
would like to patch and experiment with it. I couldn't find this info in
the released patch.
Thanks a lot!
On Tue, Sep 10, 2
23 matches
Mail list logo
