Thanks Randall. I was able to apply the patch - now rebuilding the kernel. Would update on how it goes.
BTW, is there any description on how lack of tc_fq under FreeBSD is compensated here? The original BBR patches on Linux show that as a must-have? Is that functionality implemented via tcp_ratelimit.[ch]? Any pointers to existing presentations/discussions highly appreciated? Thanks a lot. On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:39 AM Randall Stewart <r...@netflix.com> wrote: > You should be able to compile it against the current head. I re-doing that > now (had an > issue with my machine and had to roll it back to a backup). > > When I put the patch up on Sept 10th it complied with and without BBR on > whatever > was that rev.. > > Looking in the commit logs that would have been around 352191 > > Hope that helps > > R > > > On Sep 17, 2019, at 3:32 AM, vm finance <vm.finan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Randall, > > > > Thanks for releasing BBR patch: > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582#change-xcAWBif3E9Jq > > > > Could you please let me know what SVN/GIT label tag this is based on? I > would like to patch and experiment with it. I couldn't find this info in > the released patch. > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:26 AM Ryan Stone <ryst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > rrs@ has just posted the BBR patch to phabricator: > > > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582 > > ------ > Randall Stewart > r...@netflix.com > > > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
