Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > RFC2526 is dim, I think it's because of this RFC the last usable address
> > on a subnet ends in ff7f instead of . I wonder if anyone anywhere
> > uses those subnet anycast addresses.
> >
>
> I have to look it up on the status page, but I thought 2526 had been
> deprec
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 8:56 PM Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Hiroki Sato wrote:
> > va> Can any IPv6 unicast or link-local address be configured as an
> anycast
> > va> address of a router?
> >
> > Yes. There is no restriction about address scope.
> >
> > You might want to read RFC 4291, which defin
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239704
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://reviews.freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239240
--- Comment #7 from John Delano ---
I just applied the mentioned patch and the interface (IGB) does not immediately
fail, but if unplugged for a few minutes, the error messages begin and the
interface goes hard down with no method of recove
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239704
Piotr Pietruszewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||piotr.pietruszewski@intel.c
