Kevin Oberman wrote: > > RFC2526 is dim, I think it's because of this RFC the last usable address > > on a subnet ends in ff7f instead of ffff. I wonder if anyone anywhere > > uses those subnet anycast addresses. > > > > I have to look it up on the status page, but I thought 2526 had been > deprecated back before I retired. I thought I discovered this while setting > up anycast for our DNS servers. I'll look when I get back from walking our > dog. (Priorities change when you retire.)
On https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2526 it is not marked as deprecated or overridden or whatever. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
