In message <201906190617.x5j6hqma016...@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>,
Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
>> In message <201906181719.x5ihj8g0014...@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>,
>> "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
>>
>> >What is in /etc/host.conf, /etc/resolv.conf, do you have DNS running?
>>
>>
>> 1) https://pastebin.com/raw
> In message <201906181719.x5ihj8g0014...@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>,
> "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
>
> >What is in /etc/host.conf, /etc/resolv.conf, do you have DNS running?
>
>
> 1) https://pastebin.com/raw/wXTTgd9R
This is /etc/hosts, not /etc/host.conf
# cat /etc/host.conf
# Auto-generated from nss
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:28 PM Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
> In message w...@mail.gmail.com>
> Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>
> >But why are you even running rc.firewall if it does not do what you want?
>
> You are asking me the very question that *I* have been asking myself
> since my "upgrade" to 1
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226217
bc...@newestech.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bc...@newestech.com
--- Comme
19.06.2019 3:57, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> And god only knows how much will break once I've done that.
IPv6 will break only.
> How many other
> people have tested -all- of the resulting binaries, seriously, on actual
> production systems? (I may be the first one ever, at least for 12.0.)
I
Hello,
Can you please submit the bxe patch attached? Patch was created using bxe
sources from upstream head branch.
Fix for warning " lock order reversal: (sleepable after non-sleepable) seen
with bxe driver module.
Name: Vaishali Kulkarni, email vkulka...@marvell.com
Thanks,
Vaishali
Only i
In message
Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>But why are you even running rc.firewall if it does not do what you want?
You are asking me the very question that *I* have been asking myself
since my "upgrade" to 12.0.
Why is /etc/rc.firewall even being executed? I never explicitly asked for
that, but th
In message <201906181719.x5ihj8g0014...@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>,
"Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
>What is in /etc/host.conf, /etc/resolv.conf, do you have DNS running?
1) https://pastebin.com/raw/wXTTgd9R
2) https://pastebin.com/raw/PiGpN0LU
3) Yes, local-unbound
In message
Freddie Cash wrote:
>For someone who doesn't want to be preached to about the benefits of IPv6,
>you certainly do a lot of preaching about not wanting IPv6. :)
Guilty as charged.
>You've been given the tools to do exactly what you want:
> - comment out IPv6 support in the kernel c
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 9:27 PM Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
> In message p6ukxfa4zthtrzwnxtpzi...@mail.gmail.com>
> Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>
> >I have no ipv6 rules in ipfw when configuring rc.conf as:
> >
> >firewall_enable="YES"
> >firewall_script="/etc/ipfw.rules".
>
> I don't know what to sa
In message
Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>I have no ipv6 rules in ipfw when configuring rc.conf as:
>
>firewall_enable="YES"
>firewall_script="/etc/ipfw.rules".
I don't know what to say, other than that this was not my experience.
When I first noiced that /etc/rc.firewall was injecting rules into ipf
In message <23816.53518.998090.665...@jerusalem.litteratus.org>,
Robert Huff wrote:
>> Actually, no, that's not how one is supposed to enable one's own set
>> of ipfw ules. To do that, the Handbook (Sec. 30.4.1) says very clearly
>> that one should do:
>>
>> firewall_enable="YES"
>>
> In message
> ,
> Adam wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 12:54 AM Ronald F. Guilmette
> >wrote:
> >> ... except for the browsers, and also one other thing (nmh outbound
> >> email handling). Now, both Firefox and Opera crash and burn, right
> >> out of the gate, when started from the comma
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 12:45 AM Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
> In message ,
> Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
> >18.06.2019 10:10, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> >
> >> How can I turn off IPv6 entirely without rebuilding the kernel?
> >
> >You cannot. GENERIC kernel specifically enables IPv6 support and y
Andreas Nilsson writes:
> > If this is true - haven't checked personally - then it's a bug.
> > (And a non-trivial one, the fact you're the first to report it
> > notwithstanding.)
> > Can you please open a bug report?
>
> The bug being that firewall_type is used to specify
Hi all,
> Am 18.06.2019 um 13:54 schrieb Robert Huff :
>
> If this is true - haven't checked personally - then it's a bug.
> (And a non-trivial one, the fact you're the first to report it
> notwithstanding.)
> Can you please open a bug report?
I doubt it would qualify as a bug - poss
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:16 PM Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Ronald F. Guilmette writes:
>
> > >Instead of messing with the system provided file you could
> > >create a new one with only your own desired rules and then set
> > >this rc.conf variable:
> > >
> > >firewall_script="/etc/rc.firewal
Ronald F. Guilmette writes:
> >Instead of messing with the system provided file you could
> >create a new one with only your own desired rules and then set
> >this rc.conf variable:
> >
> >firewall_script="/etc/rc.firewall"
>
> Actually, no, that's not how one is supposed to enable o
"Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote:
> As I have already learned, the /etc/rc.firewall script also assumes both the
> presence of, and the desirability of IPv6 support. And unless one edits that
> file manually... which I have been effectively forced to do... there is no way
> to get it to simply NOT cr
18.06.2019 14:44, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>>> How can I turn off IPv6 entirely without rebuilding the kernel?
>> You cannot. GENERIC kernel specifically enables IPv6 support and you need to
>> disable it at compile time.
>> And if you do, you better rebuild the world too using WITHOUT_INET6=yes
In message <20190618082951.ga84...@straasha.imrryr.org>,
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>Agreed. I find it takes very little effort to not have IPv6 get
>in my way, and with that taken care of, it is then occasionally
>even useful. If this thread boils down to annoyance about localhost
>resolving to b
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 01:39:46AM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> >
> > firewall_script="/etc/rc.firewall"
>
> Actually, no, that's not how one is supposed to enable one's own set
> of ipfw ules. To do that, the Handbook (Sec. 30.4.1) says very clearly
> that one should do:
>
> fir
In message <9af5df39-9b81-4270-b25c-d089c971e...@punkt.de>,
"Patrick M. Hausen" wrote:
> Am 18.06.2019 um 09:44 schrieb Ronald F. Guilmette :
>> As I have already learned, the /etc/rc.firewall script also assumes both the
>> presence of, and the desirability of IPv6 support. And unless one edit
W dniu 18.06.2019 o 10:09, christian russell pisze:
> My opinion is that being able to practically ignore IPv6, without operational
> detraction, is a reasonable degree of freedom. FreeBSD isn’t pushing IPv6
> any more or less than any other mainstream OSes.
>
> Given a set number of developer
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 01:09:16AM -0700, christian russell wrote:
> > I ask again, is this really such an unreasonable thing to hope for?
>
> If I were allocating work-hours on FreeBSD development my answer would be:
> “yup" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Agreed. I find it takes very little effort to not have I
My opinion is that being able to practically ignore IPv6, without operational
detraction, is a reasonable degree of freedom. FreeBSD isn’t pushing IPv6 any
more or less than any other mainstream OSes.
Given a set number of developer hours I would prefer that IPv6 be fully
implemented and funct
Hi!
> Am 18.06.2019 um 09:44 schrieb Ronald F. Guilmette :
> As I have already learned, the /etc/rc.firewall script also assumes both the
> presence of, and the desirability of IPv6 support. And unless one edits that
> file manually... which I have been effectively forced to do... there is no way
In message ,
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>18.06.2019 10:10, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
>> How can I turn off IPv6 entirely without rebuilding the kernel?
>
>You cannot. GENERIC kernel specifically enables IPv6 support and you need to
>disable it at compile time.
>And if you do, you better rebuild t
28 matches
Mail list logo
