Hi all, > Am 18.06.2019 um 13:54 schrieb Robert Huff <roberth...@rcn.com>: > > If this is true - haven't checked personally - then it's a bug. > (And a non-trivial one, the fact you're the first to report it > notwithstanding.) > Can you please open a bug report?
I doubt it would qualify as a bug - possibly a bug in the docs, yes. Because the observed behaviour is definitely intentional. The flow of statements in rc.firewall is: 0. flush all rules 1. setup_loopback 2. setup_ipv6_mandatory and no configuration is going to skip that - hence the only way is to use firewall_script. Then it goes on: 3. is firewall_type one of the predefined „open“, „simple“, etc.? —> configure accordingly 4. if not and firewall_type points to a readable file, suck in rules from there So, yes, there will always be mandatory IPv6 rules in place. That’s why they are called mandatory, I figure ;-) Kind regards, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Kaiserallee 13a Tel.: 0721 9109-0 Fax: -100 76133 Karlsruhe i...@punkt.de http://punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gf: Juergen Egeling _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
