Am 21.07.2017 um 13:08 schrieb Andrey V. Elsukov:
With ipfw(4) it should work, at least on FreeBSD. pfsense/opensense have
their own patches, so I don't know what can be wrong there.
I also tried 11.0 and 11.1RC3 vanilla kernels, no luck.
Will build a test setup with the OPNsense devs.
I'm s
Hi.
(Please keep me in cc, I'm not subscribed to the list.)
After deploying ndproxy[1] on a few 10-stable hosts, some of them have
experienced mbuf clusters exhaustion. Initial analysis showed that after
loading ndproxy.ko, "current" values of "mbuf clusters" and "mbuf+clusters
out of packet seco
Hi,
I see that you are an Infor partner and thought if you would like to acquire
Infor customers database to increase your customer base.
Infor Users - 37,584 IT decision makers
List Contains: Name, Company's Name, Phone Number, Fax Number, Job Title,
Email address, Complete Mailing Address, SIC
21.07.2017 23:05, Kajetan Staszkiewicz wrote:
> Unfortunately I don't see much information how to make it work with
> Strongswan. Any hints?
If you run Strongswan/FreeBSD instead of plain FreeBSD,
you should ask Strongswan maintainers for that :-)
__
Dnia piątek, 21 lipca 2017 17:09:35 CEST Eugene Grosbein pisze:
> 20.07.2017 23:17, Kajetan Staszkiewicz пишет:
> > Hey group,
> >
> > Can I somehow make IPsec encryption to happen AFTER routing decision and
> > ensure that it happens only when traffic leaves via specified interface?
>
> You may
On 21/7/17 1:23 pm, Jov wrote:
Maybe you are also interested in kcp/kcptun:
https://github.com/xtaci/kcptun
looks to me like kcp might be implemented pretty easily as a netgraph
module,
BBR looks like it would be relatively simple to port and I look
forward to seeing it.
There is also a F
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186114
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Progress |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186114
Bug 186114 depends on bug 220151, which changed state.
Bug 220151 Summary: [libc] syslog() thread unsafety: mutex lock leak
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220151
What|Removed |Added
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186114
--- Comment #123 from Cassiano Peixoto ---
(In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #116)
Hi Eugene,
The server has been running for 14 days without freezing. I think the issue has
been fixed :)
How would you like to proceed? Are you goi
Am 21.07.2017 um 13:08 schrieb Andrey V. Elsukov:
On 21.07.2017 13:59, Muenz, Michael wrote:
Am 19.07.2017 um 15:35 schrieb Andrey V. Elsukov:
Check what you will see if you set net.enc.in.ipsec_bpf_mask=3.
You should see the reply two times, the second one should be with
translated address.
On 21.07.2017 13:59, Muenz, Michael wrote:
> Am 19.07.2017 um 15:35 schrieb Andrey V. Elsukov:
>>
>> Check what you will see if you set net.enc.in.ipsec_bpf_mask=3.
>> You should see the reply two times, the second one should be with
>> translated address.
>>
> Googling around with "nat before ipse
Am 19.07.2017 um 15:35 schrieb Andrey V. Elsukov:
Check what you will see if you set net.enc.in.ipsec_bpf_mask=3.
You should see the reply two times, the second one should be with
translated address.
Googling around with "nat before ipsec" and freebsd shows many topics
like this.
It seems with
20.07.2017 23:17, Kajetan Staszkiewicz пишет:
> Hey group,
> Can I somehow make IPsec encryption to happen AFTER routing decision and
> ensure that it happens only when traffic leaves via specified interface?
You may want to upgrade to 11.1-RELEASE and utilize its new if_ipsec(4) feature
targete
13 matches
Mail list logo
